Softwr

Energy · head to head

Proxibel Grid Suite vs Wood Mackenzie Lens

Proxibel Grid Suite logo

Proxibel Grid Suite

Energy

Integrated planning and dispatch for power systems

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Wood Mackenzie Lens logo

Wood Mackenzie Lens

Energy

Subscription research data and analytics covering oil, gas, power, renewables and mining assets

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • They diverge on capability: Proxibel Grid Suite covers Network planning, Wood Mackenzie Lens covers Upstream asset data.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Proxibel Grid Suite and Wood Mackenzie Lens actually diverge.

Attributes where Proxibel Grid Suite and Wood Mackenzie Lens differ
AttributeProxibel Grid SuiteWood Mackenzie Lens
Founded2018Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Proxibel Grid Suite

  • Network planning
  • Operational planning
  • Real-time dispatch
  • Optimization algorithms
  • Contingency analysis
  • SSL encryption
  • On-premise deployment
  • Cloud deployment

Only in Wood Mackenzie Lens

  • Upstream asset data
  • Power and renewables
  • Metals and mining
  • Gas and LNG
  • Energy transition scenarios
  • Emissions data
  • Lens Direct
  • Scenario and portfolio tools

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Proxibel Grid Suite

  • Grid planningnot Wood Mackenzie Lens
  • Real-time dispatchnot Wood Mackenzie Lens

Wood Mackenzie Lens

  • A corporate development team screening acquisition targets against independent asset economicsnot Proxibel Grid Suite
  • A lender or investor testing a project sponsor case against third-party cost and production estimatesnot Proxibel Grid Suite
  • A strategy team building long-term scenarios that need consistent cross-commodity assumptionsnot Proxibel Grid Suite
  • A trading or origination desk that needs asset level supply data pulled into its own models through the APInot Proxibel Grid Suite

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Proxibel Grid Suite

Nothing recorded yet. See the Proxibel Grid Suite review.

Wood Mackenzie Lens

  • Licensing is per named seat and per dataset, so sharing a login across an analyst team breaches the contract and licensing the team properly multiplies the fee rather than adding to it.
  • The content is analyst-modelled rather than operator-reported, so asset economics and reserve figures are estimates and can differ materially from what the owner of the asset publishes.
  • Modules are split by commodity and by region, and a question that spans gas and power, or Americas and EMEA, can require two or three separate subscriptions to answer.
  • Content refresh follows the research publication calendar, so individual asset records can lag a transaction or a project decision by a quarter or more, which matters on live deals.
  • Ownership passed from Verisk to Veritas Capital in 2023, so buyers signing multi-year terms are contracting with a private equity holding whose plans for pricing and packaging are not public.

Pricing, plan by plan

Proxibel Grid Suite

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Proxibel Grid Suite review.

Wood Mackenzie Lens

On request
  • Lens subscription$undefined/year
    • Quoted per dataset and per named user
    • Regional variants of a module are priced as separate subscriptions
    • Lens Direct API access licensed on top of platform access

Which should you pick?

Choose Proxibel Grid Suite if

  • You need network planning.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want operational planning.
Proxibel Grid Suite review

Choose Wood Mackenzie Lens if

  • You need upstream asset data.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want power and renewables.
Wood Mackenzie Lens review

Questions people ask

Is Proxibel Grid Suite or Wood Mackenzie Lens better?
Neither clearly leads. Proxibel Grid Suite starts at On request and Wood Mackenzie Lens at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Proxibel Grid Suite or Wood Mackenzie Lens?
Proxibel Grid Suite starts at On request and Wood Mackenzie Lens at On request.
Does Proxibel Grid Suite or Wood Mackenzie Lens run on more platforms?
Proxibel Grid Suite runs on Web, Api. Wood Mackenzie Lens runs on Web, API.
What is Proxibel Grid Suite best used for?
Proxibel Grid Suite is most often used for grid planning, real-time dispatch. Of those, grid planning and real-time dispatch are not what Wood Mackenzie Lens is typically brought in for.
What can Proxibel Grid Suite do that Wood Mackenzie Lens cannot?
Proxibel Grid Suite covers Network planning, Operational planning, Real-time dispatch, Optimization algorithms. Wood Mackenzie Lens covers Upstream asset data, Power and renewables, Metals and mining, Gas and LNG.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Wood Mackenzie Lens: Am I buying software or research?

Research. Lens is the delivery platform for Wood Mackenzie analysis, and the analysis is what the price reflects.

Wood Mackenzie Lens: Who owns Wood Mackenzie?

Veritas Capital, which acquired it from Verisk in 2023.

Wood Mackenzie Lens: Can a team share one licence?

No. Licences are per named user, and sharing breaches the subscription terms.

Wood Mackenzie Lens: Can I get the data into my own models?

Yes, through Lens Direct, which is licensed separately from platform access.

Share

Related pages

More on Proxibel Grid Suite

More on Wood Mackenzie Lens

Keep looking

Other head to heads