Energy · head to head
Cutsforth InsightCM vs ETAP

Cutsforth InsightCM
Energy
Multi-physics condition monitoring for generators and rotating plant, moved from National Instruments to Cutsforth
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

ETAP
Energy
Electrical power system design and analysis software
- From
- $5000/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cutsforth InsightCM ownership moved from National Instruments to Cutsforth while NI itself was absorbed by Emerson, so support contracts, documentation and any assumption of NI or Emerson backing need reconfirming from scratch.; ETAP no pricing is published, and reaching a figure requires completing a multi step quote form
- They diverge on capability: Cutsforth InsightCM covers Multi-physics correlation, ETAP covers Load flow analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cutsforth InsightCM and ETAP actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cutsforth InsightCM | ETAP |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $5000/year |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Windows, Web, Cloud | Windows, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 1986 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cutsforth InsightCM
- Multi-physics correlation
- Continuous waveform capture
- NI hardware compatibility
- Electromagnetic interference analysis
- On-premise or cloud
- Configurable acquisition
- Automated alarming
- Fleet view
Only in ETAP
- Load flow analysis
- Short circuit analysis
- Arc flash analysis
- Protective device coordination
- Harmonics analysis
- Transient stability
- Cable sizing
- Panel schedule design
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cutsforth InsightCM
- A generating station correlating partial discharge, EMI and vibration on a turbine generator in one diagnosis rather than three separate systemsnot ETAP
- A nuclear operator needing continuous waveform retention as evidence for a condition-based maintenance casenot ETAP
- An industrial site with legacy NI acquisition hardware already installed on critical machinesnot ETAP
- Comparing identical generators across a fleet to separate a machine-specific fault from a design characteristicnot ETAP
ETAP
- Electrical power system modelling, simulation and analysisnot Cutsforth InsightCM
- Arc flash, load flow and protection coordination studiesnot Cutsforth InsightCM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cutsforth InsightCM
- Ownership moved from National Instruments to Cutsforth while NI itself was absorbed by Emerson, so support contracts, documentation and any assumption of NI or Emerson backing need reconfirming from scratch.
- Cutsforth is a small specialist company, so a buyer standardising a fleet-wide monitoring platform is accepting a vendor with far less scale than Emerson, SKF or Bently Nevada.
- The product depends on data acquisition hardware on the machine, and that hardware is typically the larger part of the cost, which the software conversation tends to obscure.
- Its strength is high-value generation and large rotating assets; instrumenting a broad population of ordinary pumps and fans with it is disproportionately expensive.
- Continuous multi-physics capture produces large volumes of waveform data, so storage sizing and retention policy are real deployment decisions rather than defaults.
ETAP
- No pricing is published, and reaching a figure requires completing a multi step quote form
- Subscription durations offered are 3 years and 5 years, so there is no short commitment option
- Licences are banded by user count rather than sold individually, in brackets of 1, 5 to 15, 15 to 25, 25 to 50 and over 50
- National and international network licences are priced separately
Pricing, plan by plan
Cutsforth InsightCM
On request- InsightCM$undefined/year
- Priced per monitored machine and channel count rather than per user
- Data acquisition hardware quoted separately and often the larger cost
- On-premise and cloud deployments priced differently
ETAP
$5000/year- Standard$5000/year
- Load flow analysis
- Short circuit analysis
- Arc flash analysis
- Professional$15000/year
- Advanced analysis
- Protective device coordination
- Harmonics analysis
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Real-time monitoring
- SCADA integration
- Custom modules
Which should you pick?
Choose Cutsforth InsightCM if
- You need multi-physics correlation.
- You work on Windows, Web, Cloud.
- You also want continuous waveform capture.
Choose ETAP if
- You need load flow analysis.
- You work on Windows, Api.
- You also want short circuit analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Cutsforth InsightCM or ETAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cutsforth InsightCM starts at On request and ETAP at $5000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cutsforth InsightCM or ETAP?
- Cutsforth InsightCM starts at On request and ETAP at $5000/year.
- Does Cutsforth InsightCM or ETAP run on more platforms?
- Cutsforth InsightCM runs on Windows, Web, Cloud. ETAP runs on Windows, Api.
- What is Cutsforth InsightCM best used for?
- Cutsforth InsightCM is most often used for a generating station correlating partial discharge, emi and vibration on a turbine generator in one diagnosis rather than three separate systems, a nuclear operator needing continuous waveform retention as evidence for a condition-based maintenance case, an industrial site with legacy ni acquisition hardware already installed on critical machines, comparing identical generators across a fleet to separate a machine-specific fault from a design characteristic. Of those, a generating station correlating partial discharge, emi and vibration on a turbine generator in one diagnosis rather than three separate systems and a nuclear operator needing continuous waveform retention as evidence for a condition-based maintenance case are not what ETAP is typically brought in for.
- What can Cutsforth InsightCM do that ETAP cannot?
- Cutsforth InsightCM covers Multi-physics correlation, Continuous waveform capture, NI hardware compatibility, Electromagnetic interference analysis. ETAP covers Load flow analysis, Short circuit analysis, Arc flash analysis, Protective device coordination.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cutsforth InsightCM: Is InsightCM still a National Instruments product?
No. It was developed by NI but is now owned and developed by Cutsforth. NI itself became part of Emerson in October 2023.
ETAP: How is ETAP priced?
ETAP uses subscription-based pricing with tiered bundles (Launch, Grow, Scale) and optional add-ons. Specific prices are not published and require completing a quote request form.
SourceCutsforth InsightCM: Does it require NI hardware?
It is compatible with NI-based acquisition systems and with Cutsforth monitoring hardware, so existing NI installations carry over.
ETAP: What products does ETAP offer pricing for?
ETAP offers three main product lines with tiered bundles: CANECO (Electrical Design), ETAP (Power Systems Analysis), and SEE Electrical (Electrical Engineering). Each supports 1-50+ users with 3-5 year term options.
SourceCutsforth InsightCM: What makes it different from a vibration platform?
It correlates several measurement types, including partial discharge and electromagnetic interference, which matters on generators rather than on general rotating equipment.
Cutsforth InsightCM: Can it be deployed on-premise?
Yes, on-premise or cloud, which is why it remains viable for nuclear and utility sites with data residency rules.
Related pages
More on Cutsforth InsightCM
Other head to heads
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs AVEVA PI System
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs GE Digital Grid Software
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Bently Nevada System 1
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Emerson Ovation
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Novity
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs ABB Ability
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Enphase Enlighten
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Cognite Data Fusion
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Generac Grid Services
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs SolarWinds
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs OSIsoft PI System
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs P2 Energy Solutions
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Pulse Energy Software
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Quorum CTRM
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs SAP for Utilities
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Aurora Solar
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs HOMER Energy
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Azelio Energy Storage
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Siemens Spectrum Power
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Fluence Energy Management
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Itron
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Cutsforth InsightCM vs GE Digital GridOS
- ETAP vs AVEVA PI System
- ETAP vs GE Digital Grid Software
- ETAP vs Bently Nevada System 1
- ETAP vs Emerson Ovation
- ETAP vs Novity
- ETAP vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- ETAP vs ABB Ability
- ETAP vs Enphase Enlighten
- ETAP vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- ETAP vs Cognite Data Fusion
- ETAP vs Generac Grid Services
- ETAP vs SolarWinds
- ETAP vs OSIsoft PI System
- ETAP vs P2 Energy Solutions
- ETAP vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- ETAP vs Pulse Energy Software
- ETAP vs Quorum CTRM
- ETAP vs SAP for Utilities
- ETAP vs Aurora Solar
- ETAP vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- ETAP vs HOMER Energy
- ETAP vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- ETAP vs Azelio Energy Storage
- ETAP vs Siemens Spectrum Power
- ETAP vs Fluence Energy Management
- ETAP vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- ETAP vs Itron
- ETAP vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- ETAP vs GE Digital GridOS
