Spreadsheets · head to head
Equals vs TiDB

Equals
Spreadsheets
A real spreadsheet with SQL result sets landing in its cells, now sold only on annual contracts starting at 24,000 USD
- From
- $24000/year
- Rated
- -

TiDB
Databases
Apache 2.0 distributed SQL database with MySQL wire compatibility and a separate columnar replica for analytical queries.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only TiDB has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Equals the price list now starts at 24,000 USD a year with no monthly billing and no self-serve signup, having offered a free plan in 2023 and 39 USD per seat in 2024, so any team that evaluated it previously is looking at a different product commercially.; TiDB a production cluster needs several placement driver, storage and SQL nodes before it is fault tolerant, so the minimum viable footprint is far larger than a MySQL server and TiDB is never the economical choice for a small database.
- They diverge on capability: Equals covers Connected sheets, TiDB covers MySQL wire compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Equals and TiDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Equals
- Connected sheets
- Real spreadsheet mechanics
- Cell references into SQL
- Equals Warehouse
- Views
- Writeback
Only in TiDB
- MySQL wire compatibility
- Horizontal write scaling
- Distributed ACID transactions
- TiFlash columnar replica
- Automatic rebalancing
- Raft replication
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Online schema change
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Equals
- A revenue operations team that wants software metrics computed in a spreadsheet rather than defined in a BI semantic layernot TiDB
- Analysts who need a SQL result and manual assumptions in the same file, with the assumptions visible as cellsnot TiDB
- Joining Stripe, Salesforce and a production database without building a warehouse and pipeline firstnot TiDB
- Distributing a recurring numbers pack to Slack, email or a wall display without rebuilding it as a dashboardnot TiDB
TiDB
- A MySQL workload that has hit the write ceiling of a single primary and would otherwise need an application-level sharding layernot Equals
- Reporting that must run against current transactional data, where the columnar replica removes the delay and the cost of an ETL pipelinenot Equals
- Multi-region deployments needing a single logical database with automatic failover rather than manual primary promotionnot Equals
- Migrating off a sharded MySQL estate where the sharding logic in the application has become the main source of bugs and operational toilnot Equals
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Equals
- The price list now starts at 24,000 USD a year with no monthly billing and no self-serve signup, having offered a free plan in 2023 and 39 USD per seat in 2024, so any team that evaluated it previously is looking at a different product commercially.
- Your data is copied out of your infrastructure by design, into a Snowflake warehouse that Equals operates, with Fivetran holding non-SQL source data in transit, and no self-hosted or bring-your-own-warehouse option is documented.
- The financial function category contains only IRR, NPV and PMT, with no XIRR, XNPV, FV, PV, RATE or NPER, and there is no LAMBDA, LET, OFFSET or INDIRECT, so a substantial class of existing spreadsheet models cannot be ported without rework.
- No documentation of importing or exporting Excel files exists anywhere in the docs index; the supported file sources are CSV and Google Sheets and the only documented export is dashboards as PDF, which is a notable gap for a product positioning itself as a successor to Excel.
- Data freshness is a pricing lever rather than a setting, at six hours on Essential, one hour on Business and fifteen minutes on Enterprise, and the feature that removes row limits is itself gated above the entry tier, so the Essential row ceiling is neither published nor unlimited.
TiDB
- A production cluster needs several placement driver, storage and SQL nodes before it is fault tolerant, so the minimum viable footprint is far larger than a MySQL server and TiDB is never the economical choice for a small database.
- Every transaction takes a timestamp from the placement driver and crosses the network to storage nodes, so simple point queries are slower than on single-node MySQL and latency-sensitive paths need to be measured, not assumed.
- MySQL compatibility is at the wire and dialect level but not complete; stored procedures, triggers and events are not supported, so an application that pushed logic into the database cannot simply be repointed.
- The columnar replica is an extra full copy of the data on its own nodes, so hybrid analytics roughly doubles storage and adds hardware that must be sized and paid for separately.
- Operating it well requires cluster-specific expertise in TiUP or the Kubernetes operator, region hot spots, and rebalancing behaviour, so the licence is free but the running cost includes an engineer who understands distributed storage.
Pricing, plan by plan
Equals
$24000/year- Essential$24000/year
- Unlimited viewers and unlimited editors
- 3 connectors
- Data sync every 6 hours
- Business$36000/year
- Unlimited viewers and unlimited editors
- 5 connectors or a warehouse connection
- Data sync every hour
- Enterprise$60000/year
- Unlimited viewers and unlimited editors
- Unlimited connectors or a warehouse connection
- Data sync every 15 minutes
- Connector add-ons$199/month
- 199 USD per month for each additional database or import script connector
- 699 USD per month for each additional connector of any other type
- Available on Business and Enterprise
TiDB
Free- ServerlessFree
- 5GB storage
- 50M request units
- Free forever tier
- Dedicated$250/month
- Dedicated resources
- SLA guarantees
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Equals if
- You need connected sheets.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want real spreadsheet mechanics.
Choose TiDB if
- You need mysql wire compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Self-managed.
- You also want horizontal write scaling.
Questions people ask
- Is Equals or TiDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Equals starts at $24000/year and TiDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Equals or TiDB?
- TiDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $24000/year for Equals and Free for TiDB.
- Does Equals or TiDB run on more platforms?
- Equals runs on Web, API. TiDB runs on Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Self-managed.
- Can I use TiDB for free?
- Yes. TiDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Equals starts at $24000/year.
- What is Equals best used for?
- Equals is most often used for a revenue operations team that wants software metrics computed in a spreadsheet rather than defined in a bi semantic layer, analysts who need a sql result and manual assumptions in the same file, with the assumptions visible as cells, joining stripe, salesforce and a production database without building a warehouse and pipeline first, distributing a recurring numbers pack to slack, email or a wall display without rebuilding it as a dashboard. Of those, a revenue operations team that wants software metrics computed in a spreadsheet rather than defined in a bi semantic layer and analysts who need a sql result and manual assumptions in the same file, with the assumptions visible as cells are not what TiDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Equals do that TiDB cannot?
- Equals covers Connected sheets, Real spreadsheet mechanics, Cell references into SQL, Equals Warehouse. TiDB covers MySQL wire compatibility, Horizontal write scaling, Distributed ACID transactions, TiFlash columnar replica.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Equals: Is it a real spreadsheet or a modelling tool with a grid?
A real spreadsheet. A1 references, absolute reference locking, pivot tables and spilling array formulas all work, and SQL results land in ranges that ordinary cells reference.
TiDB: Is TiDB a drop-in replacement for MySQL?
At the protocol and dialect level it is close, and most applications connect unchanged. Stored procedures, triggers and events are not supported, and latency characteristics differ, so it needs testing rather than assumption.
Equals: What does it actually cost?
24,000 USD a year for Essential, 36,000 for Business and 60,000 for Enterprise, billed annually. There is no monthly option and no self-serve signup; the trial is negotiated per customer.
TiDB: What licence is it under?
Apache 2.0, for both TiDB and the underlying TiKV storage engine. TiKV is a graduated CNCF project, which is a meaningful governance signal in a market where several competitors moved to source-available licences.
Equals: Are seats charged?
No. Viewers and editors are unlimited on every plan. The meters are connector count, refresh frequency and AI spend, with additional connectors at 199 or 699 USD a month.
TiDB: Do I need TiFlash?
Only for analytical queries. It is an optional columnar replica; without it TiDB is a distributed transactional database. With it you get analytics on live data at the cost of an additional full copy.
Equals: Does my data stay in my own warehouse?
No. Connecting more than one source syncs data into a Snowflake warehouse that Equals runs, and non-SQL sources pass through Fivetran. There is no documented self-hosted option.
TiDB: Is the managed cloud the same software?
TiDB Cloud runs the same engine, with the control plane, scaling and operational tooling provided as a service. The entry tier is metered differently from a dedicated cluster, so the cost model rather than the engine is what changes.
TiDB: When is TiDB the wrong choice?
When the database is small enough for one server, when latency on single-row lookups is the primary constraint, or when the application depends on MySQL stored procedures and triggers.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Equals vs Looker
- Equals vs Coefficient
- Equals vs Metabase
- Equals vs Redash
- Equals vs Quadratic
- Equals vs Sigma Computing
- Equals vs Tableau
- Equals vs Apache Superset
- Equals vs Teable
- Equals vs Baserow
- Equals vs Numbers
- Equals vs SeaTable
- Equals vs APITable
- Equals vs Cube Software
- Equals vs Mathesar
- Equals vs Rowy
- Equals vs Cockroach Labs
- Equals vs Vitess
- Equals vs Elasticsearch
- Equals vs SingleStore
- Equals vs BigQuery
- Equals vs DuckDB
- Equals vs Amazon Redshift
- Equals vs ClickHouse
- Equals vs Apache Druid
- Equals vs Couchbase
- Equals vs MariaDB
- Equals vs TimescaleDB
- Equals vs Redpanda
- Equals vs RisingWave
- Equals vs ScyllaDB
- Equals vs Solace PubSub+
- Equals vs SQLite
- Equals vs StarRocks
- TiDB vs Looker
- TiDB vs Coefficient
- TiDB vs Metabase
- TiDB vs Redash
- TiDB vs Quadratic
- TiDB vs Sigma Computing
- TiDB vs Tableau
- TiDB vs Apache Superset
- TiDB vs Teable
- TiDB vs Baserow
- TiDB vs Numbers
- TiDB vs SeaTable
- TiDB vs APITable
- TiDB vs Cube Software
- TiDB vs Mathesar
- TiDB vs Rowy
- TiDB vs Cockroach Labs
- TiDB vs Vitess
- TiDB vs Elasticsearch
- TiDB vs SingleStore
- TiDB vs BigQuery
- TiDB vs DuckDB
- TiDB vs Amazon Redshift
- TiDB vs ClickHouse
- TiDB vs Apache Druid
- TiDB vs Couchbase
- TiDB vs MariaDB
- TiDB vs TimescaleDB
- TiDB vs Redpanda
- TiDB vs RisingWave
- TiDB vs ScyllaDB
- TiDB vs Solace PubSub+
- TiDB vs SQLite
- TiDB vs StarRocks
