Developer Tools · head to head
Envoy vs Ping Identity

Envoy
Developer Tools
A high-performance L7 proxy written in C++ that is configured by an API rather than a config file, and is usually deployed under a control plane.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Envoy is free; Ping Identity starts at $3/mo.
- Only Envoy lists xDS dynamic configuration; only Ping Identity lists single sign-on.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Envoy and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Envoy | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $3/month |
| Pricing model | Open-source | Per user per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux, Windows |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Envoy
- xDS dynamic configuration
- Protocol breadth
- Filter chain architecture
- Observability by default
- Outlier detection
- Traffic shaping
- mTLS termination and origination
- Hot restart
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Envoy
- Acting as the data plane under a service mesh or Gateway API implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use itnot Ping Identity
- An edge or API gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxyingnot Ping Identity
- Migrating traffic between service versions or between a monolith and its replacement, using weighted splits and shadow trafficnot Ping Identity
- Standardising observability across a polyglot estate, so that latency, error rates and tracing look the same regardless of the language a service is written innot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Envoy
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Envoy
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Envoy
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Envoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Envoy
- The configuration surface is very large and hand-written bootstrap YAML runs to hundreds of lines for routing that Nginx expresses in twenty, which is why nearly every production deployment sits under a control plane and inherits that control plane's constraints as well
- xDS is the real API and it is not stable in the comfortable sense; the v2 API set was removed outright, resource types continue to be deprecated, and your control plane and Envoy binaries have to be upgraded roughly in step or the proxies stop accepting configuration
- Extending it properly means writing a C++ filter and building and maintaining your own Envoy binary; the alternatives are Lua, which adds per-request overhead, and proxy-wasm, whose ABI has remained effectively experimental for years with a real performance cost
- At sidecar density the per-proxy memory and CPU footprint is a measurable share of cluster capacity, since thousands of workloads each carry a full proxy, and this is precisely the cost that has pushed mesh projects towards node-level or ambient architectures
- There is no single vendor selling support for Envoy itself; you get the community plus control-plane vendors such as Solo.io and Tetrate, so an Envoy-level production bug is your own engineers in a C++ codebase unless a support contract happens to cover it
- Diagnosing why a request got a particular response involves reading config dumps, the stats endpoint and the RESPONSE_FLAGS codes in access logs rather than a readable error, which is a specific skill you must hire or spend months growing
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies
Pricing, plan by plan
Envoy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Envoy review.
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/mo
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/mo
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35,000/yr
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50,000/yr
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose Envoy if
- You need xds dynamic configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want protocol breadth.
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is Envoy or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Envoy starts at Free and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Envoy or Ping Identity?
- Envoy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Envoy and $3/month for Ping Identity.
- Does Envoy or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- Envoy runs on Web. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- Can I use Envoy for free?
- Yes. Envoy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ping Identity starts at $3/month.
- What is Envoy best used for?
- Envoy is most often used for acting as the data plane under a service mesh or gateway api implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use it, an edge or api gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxying, migrating traffic between service versions or between a monolith and its replacement, using weighted splits and shadow traffic, standardising observability across a polyglot estate, so that latency, error rates and tracing look the same regardless of the language a service is written in. Of those, acting as the data plane under a service mesh or gateway api implementation, which is how the overwhelming majority of deployments use it and an edge or api gateway that needs per-route retry budgets, circuit breaking and outlier detection rather than round-robin proxying are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can Envoy do that Ping Identity cannot?
- Envoy covers xDS dynamic configuration, Protocol breadth, Filter chain architecture, Observability by default. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Envoy: Should I run Envoy on its own, or under a control plane?
Almost always under one. Directly authoring xDS or static bootstrap configuration is viable for a handful of routes and becomes unmanageable beyond that. Envoy Gateway, Istio, Contour, Gloo and Consul all exist to generate that configuration for you.
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Envoy: How does it compare with Nginx or HAProxy?
Envoy is dynamically configured over an API and instrumented far more heavily; Nginx and HAProxy are faster to configure and lighter for straightforward reverse proxying. If you never need to change routing without a reload, Envoy is more machinery than the problem requires.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Envoy: What does it cost?
Nothing to licence; it is Apache 2.0 and there is no paid edition. The cost is engineering time and, for most organisations, a commercial control plane or cloud service that packages it.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Envoy: Can I write extensions without C++?
You can write Lua filters or proxy-wasm modules in Rust, Go, C++ or AssemblyScript. Both carry per-request overhead compared with a native filter, and the Wasm path has been slower to stabilise than the project originally projected.
Envoy: Is it a CNCF project?
Yes, it is a graduated CNCF project licensed under Apache 2.0, which means the trademark and governance sit with the foundation rather than with Lyft or any vendor.
Related pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Envoy vs Istio
- Envoy vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Envoy vs Spacelift
- Envoy vs Atlantis
- Envoy vs Jenkins
- Envoy vs Hookdeck
- Envoy vs Restate
- Envoy vs Helix
- Envoy vs Turborepo
- Envoy vs StackBlitz
- Envoy vs Webpack
- Envoy vs Backstage
- Envoy vs OpsLevel
- Envoy vs PartyKit
- Envoy vs PhpStorm
- Envoy vs Pieces for Developers
- Envoy vs RAD Studio
- Envoy vs Refact
- Envoy vs Okta
- Envoy vs Auth0
- Envoy vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Envoy vs Frontegg
- Envoy vs Speakeasy
- Envoy vs Akeyless
- Envoy vs authentik
- Envoy vs Logto
- Envoy vs Authelia
- Envoy vs Transmit Security
- Envoy vs Delinea
- Envoy vs Genetec Security Center
- Envoy vs Unit21
- Envoy vs Veracode
- Envoy vs Very Good Security
- Envoy vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Envoy vs Windscribe
- Envoy vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Istio
- Ping Identity vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Ping Identity vs Spacelift
- Ping Identity vs Atlantis
- Ping Identity vs Jenkins
- Ping Identity vs Hookdeck
- Ping Identity vs Restate
- Ping Identity vs Helix
- Ping Identity vs Turborepo
- Ping Identity vs StackBlitz
- Ping Identity vs Webpack
- Ping Identity vs Backstage
- Ping Identity vs OpsLevel
- Ping Identity vs PartyKit
- Ping Identity vs PhpStorm
- Ping Identity vs Pieces for Developers
- Ping Identity vs RAD Studio
- Ping Identity vs Refact
- Ping Identity vs Okta
- Ping Identity vs Auth0
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs Unit21
- Ping Identity vs Veracode
- Ping Identity vs Very Good Security
- Ping Identity vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Ping Identity vs Windscribe
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
