Databases · head to head
FaunaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database

FaunaDB
Databases
Document-relational database whose hosted service closed in 2025 and whose core is now unmaintained Apache 2.0 code.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Firebase Realtime Database
Databases
Store and sync data in real-time across all clients
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FaunaDB the hosted service was wound down in 2025, so there is no managed Fauna to buy; every remaining user either operates a JVM cluster themselves or migrates, and both are projects rather than tasks.; Firebase Realtime Database the no-cost Spark plan caps storage at 1 GB, downloads at 10 GB per month and simultaneous connections at 100
- They diverge on capability: FaunaDB covers Document-relational model, Firebase Realtime Database covers Real-time Sync.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FaunaDB and Firebase Realtime Database actually diverge.
| Attribute | FaunaDB | Firebase Realtime Database |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, Ios, Android |
| Founded | 2012 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FaunaDB
- Document-relational model
- FQL v10
- Distributed ACID transactions
- HTTPS access
- User-defined functions
- Attribute-based access control
- Document history
- Event streaming
Only in Firebase Realtime Database
- Real-time Sync
- Offline Support
- JSON Storage
- Security Rules
- Data Validation
- Multi-platform SDKs
- Scalable
- Firebase Auth
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FaunaDB
- Keeping an existing Fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and fundednot Firebase Realtime Database
- Extracting historical data from a Fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted APInot Firebase Realtime Database
- Studying a production implementation of deterministic distributed transactions, since the full server source is now readable under Apache 2.0not Firebase Realtime Database
- Forking the engine deliberately, where an organisation has JVM and distributed-systems staff and wants a document-relational store it fully controlsnot Firebase Realtime Database
Firebase Realtime Database
- Syncing JSON application state between clients in real timenot FaunaDB
- Backing mobile and web apps with offline capable data storagenot FaunaDB
- Prototyping realtime features such as presence and chatnot FaunaDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FaunaDB
- The hosted service was wound down in 2025, so there is no managed Fauna to buy; every remaining user either operates a JVM cluster themselves or migrates, and both are projects rather than tasks.
- The open-sourced repository has had no substantive activity since May 2025 and the drivers were frozen alongside it, so you inherit responsibility for security patches in a Scala distributed database that almost nobody else is running.
- FQL has no wire or dialect compatibility with anything else, so migrating off is a rewrite of every query, index and access rule in the application rather than a data export.
- No BI tool, ORM or CDC connector speaks FQL, so reporting and analytics always required exporting the data first, and that export tooling is now also unmaintained.
- The community was small before the shutdown and has dispersed since, so operational answers, tuning advice and people who have run a Fauna cluster in anger are all scarce when something breaks.
Firebase Realtime Database
- The no-cost Spark plan caps storage at 1 GB, downloads at 10 GB per month and simultaneous connections at 100
- The Spark plan does not support multiple databases in a project
- Even on the paid Blaze plan simultaneous connections are capped at 200,000 per database
- Billing is by data transferred out at $1 per GB plus $5 per GB stored, so chatty clients cost more than the data volume suggests
Pricing, plan by plan
FaunaDB
Free- FreeFree
- 100K read ops
- 50K write ops
- 1GB storage
- Pro$25/month
- Pay per use
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Firebase Realtime Database
Free- SparkFree
- 1 GB data storage included
- 10 GB per month data downloads included
- No charges for usage within limits
- Blaze$5/per_GB_per_month
- Maintains Spark free allowances
- Pay-as-you-go for usage exceeding limits
- Billing applies to data stored and outbound network traffic
Which should you pick?
Choose FaunaDB if
- You need document-relational model.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want fql v10.
Choose Firebase Realtime Database if
- You need real-time sync.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want offline support.
Questions people ask
- Is FaunaDB or Firebase Realtime Database better?
- Neither clearly leads. FaunaDB starts at Free and Firebase Realtime Database at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FaunaDB or Firebase Realtime Database?
- FaunaDB starts at Free and Firebase Realtime Database at Free.
- Does FaunaDB or Firebase Realtime Database run on more platforms?
- FaunaDB runs on Web. Firebase Realtime Database runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- Can I use FaunaDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FaunaDB best used for?
- FaunaDB is most often used for keeping an existing fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and funded, extracting historical data from a fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted api, studying a production implementation of deterministic distributed transactions, since the full server source is now readable under apache 2.0, forking the engine deliberately, where an organisation has jvm and distributed-systems staff and wants a document-relational store it fully controls. Of those, keeping an existing fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and funded and extracting historical data from a fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted api are not what Firebase Realtime Database is typically brought in for.
- What can FaunaDB do that Firebase Realtime Database cannot?
- FaunaDB covers Document-relational model, FQL v10, Distributed ACID transactions, HTTPS access. Firebase Realtime Database covers Real-time Sync, Offline Support, JSON Storage, Security Rules.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FaunaDB: Can I still sign up for Fauna as a service?
No. Fauna Inc. wound down the hosted service in 2025 and the company website is no longer serving. The only way to run Fauna now is to build and operate the open-sourced server yourself.
Firebase Realtime Database: How much does Firebase Realtime Database cost?
Firebase Realtime Database offers a free Spark plan (1 GB storage, 10 GB/month downloads) and a pay-as-you-go Blaze plan. On Blaze, storage costs $5 per GB per month, evaluated daily, with no monthly minimum charges.
SourceFaunaDB: What licence is the open-sourced code under?
Apache 2.0, with the copyright held by a FaunaDB Foundation. That is a permissive OSI licence with no competing-use clause, so you may run it, modify it and even offer it as a service.
Firebase Realtime Database: What is included in Firebase Realtime Database free tier?
The Spark plan includes 1 GB of data storage and 10 GB per month of data downloads at no cost. Usage within these limits incurs no charges, making it suitable for small projects and testing.
SourceFaunaDB: Is the open source version the same software that ran the cloud?
It is the core database engine. The control plane, billing, dashboard and multi-tenant operational tooling that made it a service are not part of the release, so you are running the engine, not the product.
Firebase Realtime Database: Does Firebase Realtime Database charge for denied or rejected operations?
Yes. Firebase charges for all traffic to and from the database on the Blaze plan, including operations denied by security rules, outbound network traffic at the session layer, and connection and encryption overhead from all operations.
SourceFaunaDB: What should I migrate to?
There is no drop-in target. Teams that valued the document model with relationships usually land on Postgres with JSONB, and teams that valued the serverless HTTP access pattern usually land on DynamoDB or a managed Postgres with an HTTP driver. Either way the query layer is rewritten.
Firebase Realtime Database: Can I set a spending limit on Firebase Realtime Database?
Firebase offers budget alerts but does not cap spending automatically. Users must monitor their usage dashboard in the Firebase console to track connections, storage, downloads, and load metrics; a calculator is available for cost estimation.
SourceFaunaDB: How hard is it to self-host?
It builds as a fat JAR and runs as a multi-node JVM cluster. There is an OPERATING.md, but no supported packaging, no operator, no upstream releases and no support contract, so budget for a distributed-systems engineer, not a container.
Related pages
More on Firebase Realtime Database
Other head to heads
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- FaunaDB vs PostgreSQL
- FaunaDB vs Airtable
- FaunaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- FaunaDB vs BigQuery
- FaunaDB vs CouchDB
- FaunaDB vs CosmosDB
- FaunaDB vs ArangoDB
- FaunaDB vs Dgraph
- FaunaDB vs DynamoDB
- FaunaDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- FaunaDB vs Apache Pinot
- FaunaDB vs Amazon RDS
- FaunaDB vs Apache Pulsar
- FaunaDB vs Cassandra
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- FaunaDB vs Estuary
- FaunaDB vs ScyllaDB
- FaunaDB vs ClickHouse
- FaunaDB vs Materialize
- FaunaDB vs dbt
- FaunaDB vs EMQX
- FaunaDB vs Memcached
- FaunaDB vs MotherDuck
- FaunaDB vs Neo4j
- FaunaDB vs Apache Druid
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Amazon Aurora
- Firebase Realtime Database vs PostgreSQL
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Airtable
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Cockroach Labs
- Firebase Realtime Database vs BigQuery
- Firebase Realtime Database vs CouchDB
- Firebase Realtime Database vs CosmosDB
- Firebase Realtime Database vs ArangoDB
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Dgraph
- Firebase Realtime Database vs DynamoDB
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Google Cloud SQL
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Apache Pinot
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Amazon RDS
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Apache Pulsar
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Cassandra
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Amazon Redshift
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Estuary
- Firebase Realtime Database vs ScyllaDB
- Firebase Realtime Database vs ClickHouse
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Materialize
- Firebase Realtime Database vs dbt
- Firebase Realtime Database vs EMQX
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Memcached
- Firebase Realtime Database vs MotherDuck
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Neo4j
- Firebase Realtime Database vs Apache Druid
