Developer Tools · head to head
Earthly vs WireGuard

WireGuard
Cybersecurity
Modern, minimal-complexity VPN protocol with state-of-the-art cryptography
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Earthly pricing model not published; requires sales contact; WireGuard manual key management required; WireGuard does not provide automated peer discovery or key distribution mechanisms
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Earthly and WireGuard actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Earthly
- Policy as code
- Multi-stage enforcement
- AI agent governance
- Repository-wide policies
- Incident response automation
- Compliance management
- Earthfiles build tool
- Satellites
Only in WireGuard
Nothing recorded that Earthly does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Earthly
- Enforcing engineering standards across AI and human developersnot WireGuard
- Automating incident response procedures across all repositoriesnot WireGuard
- Embedding compliance requirements into development workflowsnot WireGuard
- Standardizing build processes with Earthfilesnot WireGuard
WireGuard
- Site-to-site VPN connectivity for datacentres and branch officesnot Earthly
- High-performance VPN applications requiring minimal latency and CPU overheadnot Earthly
- Embedded systems and IoT devices with strict memory and storage constraintsnot Earthly
- WireGuard-based managed services (Tailscale, Mullvad VPN) providing abstraction over raw protocolnot Earthly
- Kernel module for Linux-based VPN appliances and firewallsnot Earthly
- Research and development in cryptographic protocol designnot Earthly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Earthly
- Pricing model not published; requires sales contact
- Earthly Lunar is a recent launch (2025) with limited track record
- Primarily GitHub-focused; limited integration with other platforms
- No public documentation on pricing or feature tiers
WireGuard
- Manual key management required; WireGuard does not provide automated peer discovery or key distribution mechanisms
- No built-in support for address allocation or DHCP; all IP assignments must be manually configured
- Limited to UDP; TCP encapsulation requires wrapper tools, making it unsuitable for environments blocking UDP
- Stateless protocol design means lost packets trigger peer disconnection rather than transparent reconnection
- Requires operational expertise to securely configure and deploy; not suitable for non-technical users without wrapper tools (Tailscale, Mullvad)
Pricing, plan by plan
Earthly
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Earthly review.
WireGuard
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the WireGuard review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Earthly if
- You need policy as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want multi-stage enforcement.
Choose WireGuard if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, FreeBSD, OpenBSD.
Questions people ask
- Is Earthly or WireGuard better?
- Neither clearly leads. Earthly starts at Free and WireGuard at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Earthly or WireGuard?
- Earthly starts at Free and WireGuard at Free.
- Does Earthly or WireGuard run on more platforms?
- Earthly runs on Web, CLI. WireGuard runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, FreeBSD, OpenBSD.
- Can I use Earthly for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Earthly best used for?
- Earthly is most often used for enforcing engineering standards across ai and human developers, automating incident response procedures across all repositories, embedding compliance requirements into development workflows, standardizing build processes with earthfiles. Of those, enforcing engineering standards across ai and human developers and automating incident response procedures across all repositories are not what WireGuard is typically brought in for.
- What can Earthly do that WireGuard cannot?
- Earthly covers Policy as code, Multi-stage enforcement, AI agent governance, Repository-wide policies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Earthly: What is the difference between Earthfiles and Earthly Lunar?
Earthfiles is an open-source build tool that reached 12,000 GitHub stars and is used by companies like NVIDIA, Intel, and Databricks. Earthly Lunar is a separate governance platform launched in 2025 for enforcing standards across development workflows.
SourceWireGuard: Is WireGuard free?
Yes, WireGuard is free and open-source software. The Linux kernel module is licensed under GPLv2; implementations for other platforms use MIT or Apache 2.0 licences. There are no licensing fees.
SourceEarthly: How does Earthly Lunar enforce standards?
Lunar converts engineering standards, compliance requirements, and processes documented in AGENTS.md files, wikis, and incident postmortems into enforceable guardrails that apply consistently across repositories and development stages.
SourceWireGuard: How does WireGuard differ from IPsec and OpenVPN?
WireGuard replaces complex negotiation protocols and state machines with simple public-key cryptography. Its code is roughly 100 times smaller than IPsec, making it faster to audit, deploy, and maintain. It uses modern cryptographic primitives rather than legacy algorithms.
SourceEarthly: What is the pricing for Earthly Lunar?
Pricing is not published on the website. Interested customers should contact Earthly's sales team for current pricing and feature tiers.
SourceWireGuard: Can I use WireGuard for a commercial VPN service?
Yes. Several commercial VPN services (Mullvad, IVPN, ProtonVPN) use WireGuard as their underlying protocol. You must implement peer management, key distribution, and endpoint selection on top of the WireGuard protocol.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Earthly vs Spacelift
- Earthly vs Dagger
- Earthly vs Nixpacks
- Earthly vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Earthly vs OpsLevel
- Earthly vs Namespace
- Earthly vs Depot
- Earthly vs Blacksmith
- Earthly vs WarpBuild
- Earthly vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Earthly vs Garden
- Earthly vs Nx Cloud
- Earthly vs Cody
- Earthly vs ConfigCat
- Earthly vs Cortex
- Earthly vs Deep Code
- Earthly vs Deno
- Earthly vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Earthly vs 1Password
- Earthly vs Norton 360
- Earthly vs LastPass
- Earthly vs Falco
- Earthly vs Chainguard
- Earthly vs Jamf Pro
- Earthly vs SonicWall
- Earthly vs Snyk
- Earthly vs Bitwarden
- Earthly vs Brave Browser
- Earthly vs Infisical
- Earthly vs DTiQ
- Earthly vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Earthly vs ExpressVPN
- Earthly vs Fenergo
- Earthly vs Google Authenticator
- WireGuard vs Spacelift
- WireGuard vs Dagger
- WireGuard vs Nixpacks
- WireGuard vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- WireGuard vs OpsLevel
- WireGuard vs Namespace
- WireGuard vs Depot
- WireGuard vs Blacksmith
- WireGuard vs WarpBuild
- WireGuard vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- WireGuard vs Garden
- WireGuard vs Nx Cloud
- WireGuard vs Cody
- WireGuard vs ConfigCat
- WireGuard vs Cortex
- WireGuard vs Deep Code
- WireGuard vs Deno
- WireGuard vs Bitdefender Total Security
- WireGuard vs 1Password
- WireGuard vs Norton 360
- WireGuard vs LastPass
- WireGuard vs Falco
- WireGuard vs Chainguard
- WireGuard vs Jamf Pro
- WireGuard vs SonicWall
- WireGuard vs Snyk
- WireGuard vs Bitwarden
- WireGuard vs Brave Browser
- WireGuard vs Infisical
- WireGuard vs DTiQ
- WireGuard vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- WireGuard vs ExpressVPN
- WireGuard vs Fenergo
- WireGuard vs Google Authenticator

