Developer Tools · head to head
Earthly vs IBM QRadar

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Earthly has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Earthly pricing model not published; requires sales contact; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- They diverge on capability: Earthly covers Policy as code, IBM QRadar covers Offence model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Earthly and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Earthly | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | No pricing published on website | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, CLI | Web, Api |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2020 | 1911 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Earthly
- Policy as code
- Multi-stage enforcement
- AI agent governance
- Repository-wide policies
- Incident response automation
- Compliance management
- Earthfiles build tool
- Satellites
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Earthly
- Enforcing engineering standards across AI and human developersnot IBM QRadar
- Automating incident response procedures across all repositoriesnot IBM QRadar
- Embedding compliance requirements into development workflowsnot IBM QRadar
- Standardizing build processes with Earthfilesnot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Earthly
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Earthly
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Earthly
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Earthly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Earthly
- Pricing model not published; requires sales contact
- Earthly Lunar is a recent launch (2025) with limited track record
- Primarily GitHub-focused; limited integration with other platforms
- No public documentation on pricing or feature tiers
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
Earthly
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Earthly review.
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose Earthly if
- You need policy as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want multi-stage enforcement.
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Earthly or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Earthly starts at Free and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Earthly or IBM QRadar?
- Earthly has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Earthly and On request for IBM QRadar.
- Does Earthly or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- Earthly runs on Web, CLI. IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Earthly for free?
- Yes. Earthly has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is Earthly best used for?
- Earthly is most often used for enforcing engineering standards across ai and human developers, automating incident response procedures across all repositories, embedding compliance requirements into development workflows, standardizing build processes with earthfiles. Of those, enforcing engineering standards across ai and human developers and automating incident response procedures across all repositories are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can Earthly do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- Earthly covers Policy as code, Multi-stage enforcement, AI agent governance, Repository-wide policies. IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Earthly: What is the difference between Earthfiles and Earthly Lunar?
Earthfiles is an open-source build tool that reached 12,000 GitHub stars and is used by companies like NVIDIA, Intel, and Databricks. Earthly Lunar is a separate governance platform launched in 2025 for enforcing standards across development workflows.
SourceIBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Earthly: How does Earthly Lunar enforce standards?
Lunar converts engineering standards, compliance requirements, and processes documented in AGENTS.md files, wikis, and incident postmortems into enforceable guardrails that apply consistently across repositories and development stages.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Earthly: What is the pricing for Earthly Lunar?
Pricing is not published on the website. Interested customers should contact Earthly's sales team for current pricing and feature tiers.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Earthly vs Spacelift
- Earthly vs Dagger
- Earthly vs Nixpacks
- Earthly vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Earthly vs OpsLevel
- Earthly vs Namespace
- Earthly vs Depot
- Earthly vs Blacksmith
- Earthly vs WarpBuild
- Earthly vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Earthly vs Garden
- Earthly vs Nx Cloud
- Earthly vs Cody
- Earthly vs ConfigCat
- Earthly vs Cortex
- Earthly vs Deep Code
- Earthly vs Deno
- Earthly vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Earthly vs 1Password
- Earthly vs Norton 360
- Earthly vs LastPass
- Earthly vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Earthly vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Earthly vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Earthly vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Earthly vs Recorded Future
- Earthly vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Earthly vs Proofpoint
- Earthly vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Earthly vs Arnica
- Earthly vs Authelia
- Earthly vs Authy
- Earthly vs Baffle
- Earthly vs Beyond Identity
- Earthly vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Spacelift
- IBM QRadar vs Dagger
- IBM QRadar vs Nixpacks
- IBM QRadar vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- IBM QRadar vs OpsLevel
- IBM QRadar vs Namespace
- IBM QRadar vs Depot
- IBM QRadar vs Blacksmith
- IBM QRadar vs WarpBuild
- IBM QRadar vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- IBM QRadar vs Garden
- IBM QRadar vs Nx Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Cody
- IBM QRadar vs ConfigCat
- IBM QRadar vs Cortex
- IBM QRadar vs Deep Code
- IBM QRadar vs Deno
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust

