Cybersecurity · head to head
Baffle vs Earthly

Baffle
Cybersecurity
Transparent proxy that encrypts, tokenises and masks database fields without application code changes
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Earthly has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Baffle the proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.; Earthly pricing model not published; requires sales contact
- They diverge on capability: Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Earthly covers Policy as code.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Baffle and Earthly actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Baffle
- Transparent proxy deployment
- Field-level encryption
- Tokenisation
- Format-preserving de-identification
- Dynamic data masking
- Bring your own key
- Analytics and pipeline support
- AI pipeline protection
Only in Earthly
- Policy as code
- Multi-stage enforcement
- AI agent governance
- Repository-wide policies
- Incident response automation
- Compliance management
- Earthfiles build tool
- Satellites
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Baffle
- A bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account datanot Earthly
- A company wanting to take a reporting database out of PCI scope by tokenising card fields before they landnot Earthly
- A healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administernot Earthly
- A team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an AI retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobsnot Earthly
Earthly
- Enforcing engineering standards across AI and human developersnot Baffle
- Automating incident response procedures across all repositoriesnot Baffle
- Embedding compliance requirements into development workflowsnot Baffle
- Standardizing build processes with Earthfilesnot Baffle
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Baffle
- The proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.
- What you can still do in SQL depends on the protection mode chosen, and stronger modes restrict comparisons, joins and aggregations on protected columns, which can quietly break existing reports and analytics.
- Database and driver coverage is finite, so an organisation with an unusual engine, an old driver or heavy use of stored procedures may find its most important system is exactly the one not supported.
- Pricing is unpublished and scales with protected data stores, which means an enterprise trying to protect a long tail of small databases pays disproportionately compared with protecting a handful of large ones.
- Key management is your responsibility under bring your own key, and while that is the correct security posture, it moves a real operational burden and a genuine data-loss risk onto the customer.
Earthly
- Pricing model not published; requires sales contact
- Earthly Lunar is a recent launch (2025) with limited track record
- Primarily GitHub-focused; limited integration with other platforms
- No public documentation on pricing or feature tiers
Pricing, plan by plan
Baffle
On request- Baffle Data Protection Services$undefined/year
- Quoted by protected data stores and deployment scale
- Self-managed and cloud marketplace deployment options
- Annual subscription
Earthly
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Earthly review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Baffle if
- You need transparent proxy deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want field-level encryption.
Choose Earthly if
- You need policy as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want multi-stage enforcement.
Questions people ask
- Is Baffle or Earthly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Baffle starts at On request and Earthly at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Baffle or Earthly?
- Earthly has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Baffle and Free for Earthly.
- Does Baffle or Earthly run on more platforms?
- Baffle runs on Linux, Web. Earthly runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use Earthly for free?
- Yes. Earthly has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Baffle starts at On request.
- What is Baffle best used for?
- Baffle is most often used for a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data, a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land, a healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administer, a team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an ai retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobs. Of those, a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data and a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land are not what Earthly is typically brought in for.
- What can Baffle do that Earthly cannot?
- Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Field-level encryption, Tokenisation, Format-preserving de-identification. Earthly covers Policy as code, Multi-stage enforcement, AI agent governance, Repository-wide policies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Baffle: Do applications need code changes?
No. That is the central design choice. Baffle intercepts traffic as a proxy rather than requiring an SDK call at every read and write.
Earthly: What is the difference between Earthfiles and Earthly Lunar?
Earthfiles is an open-source build tool that reached 12,000 GitHub stars and is used by companies like NVIDIA, Intel, and Databricks. Earthly Lunar is a separate governance platform launched in 2025 for enforcing standards across development workflows.
SourceBaffle: Can you still query encrypted columns?
Partly, and it depends on the protection mode. Some modes preserve equality matching and format, stronger modes restrict what SQL operations remain possible, so this must be tested against your actual queries.
Earthly: How does Earthly Lunar enforce standards?
Lunar converts engineering standards, compliance requirements, and processes documented in AGENTS.md files, wikis, and incident postmortems into enforceable guardrails that apply consistently across repositories and development stages.
SourceBaffle: Does it take systems out of PCI scope?
Tokenisation can reduce scope by ensuring card data never lands in the protected system, but scope reduction is an assessor judgement, not a product setting.
Earthly: What is the pricing for Earthly Lunar?
Pricing is not published on the website. Interested customers should contact Earthly's sales team for current pricing and feature tiers.
SourceBaffle: Who holds the encryption keys?
You do, through your own key management service. Baffle supports bring your own key rather than holding customer keys itself.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Baffle vs Very Good Security
- Baffle vs HashiCorp Vault
- Baffle vs 1Password
- Baffle vs LastPass
- Baffle vs Mullvad VPN
- Baffle vs Private Internet Access
- Baffle vs IVPN
- Baffle vs TunnelBear
- Baffle vs Enpass
- Baffle vs Passbolt
- Baffle vs Feedzai
- Baffle vs Genetec Security Center
- Baffle vs Tenable Nessus
- Baffle vs Transmit Security
- Baffle vs TrustArc
- Baffle vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Baffle vs VMware Carbon Black
- Baffle vs Wireshark
- Baffle vs Spacelift
- Baffle vs Dagger
- Baffle vs Nixpacks
- Baffle vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Baffle vs OpsLevel
- Baffle vs Namespace
- Baffle vs Depot
- Baffle vs Blacksmith
- Baffle vs WarpBuild
- Baffle vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Baffle vs Garden
- Baffle vs Nx Cloud
- Baffle vs Cody
- Baffle vs ConfigCat
- Baffle vs Cortex
- Baffle vs Deep Code
- Baffle vs Deno
- Earthly vs Very Good Security
- Earthly vs HashiCorp Vault
- Earthly vs 1Password
- Earthly vs LastPass
- Earthly vs Mullvad VPN
- Earthly vs Private Internet Access
- Earthly vs IVPN
- Earthly vs TunnelBear
- Earthly vs Enpass
- Earthly vs Passbolt
- Earthly vs Feedzai
- Earthly vs Genetec Security Center
- Earthly vs Tenable Nessus
- Earthly vs Transmit Security
- Earthly vs TrustArc
- Earthly vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Earthly vs VMware Carbon Black
- Earthly vs Wireshark
- Earthly vs Spacelift
- Earthly vs Dagger
- Earthly vs Nixpacks
- Earthly vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Earthly vs OpsLevel
- Earthly vs Namespace
- Earthly vs Depot
- Earthly vs Blacksmith
- Earthly vs WarpBuild
- Earthly vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Earthly vs Garden
- Earthly vs Nx Cloud
- Earthly vs Cody
- Earthly vs ConfigCat
- Earthly vs Cortex
- Earthly vs Deep Code
- Earthly vs Deno

