Databases · head to head
DynamoDB vs GNAT Pro

DynamoDB
Databases
AWS-only managed key-value and document database with fixed per-partition throughput limits and no ad hoc queries.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

GNAT Pro
Developer Tools
Software development environments and toolchains for Ada, C/C++ and Rust
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- DynamoDB starts at $0.625/mo; GNAT Pro prices on request.
- Where GNAT Pro falls short: no pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DynamoDB and GNAT Pro actually diverge.
Not yet recorded: founded for GNAT Pro.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DynamoDB
- Managed and serverless
- Predictable latency
- On-demand or provisioned capacity
- Global secondary indexes
- Transactions
- DynamoDB Streams
- Global tables
- Point-in-time recovery
Only in GNAT Pro
Nothing recorded that DynamoDB does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DynamoDB
- High-volume keyed workloads such as sessions, shopping carts, device state or user profiles where the access pattern is fixed and knownnot GNAT Pro
- Traffic that spikes unpredictably, where on-demand capacity absorbs a burst without a capacity-planning exercisenot GNAT Pro
- Serverless applications on Lambda, where an HTTP-based datastore avoids the connection pooling problem relational databases havenot GNAT Pro
- Event or telemetry ingestion where writes vastly outnumber reads and each record is retrieved by a known identifiernot GNAT Pro
GNAT Pro
- Building certified avionics software meeting DO-178B/C standardsnot DynamoDB
- Developing automotive embedded systems with ISO-26262 compliancenot DynamoDB
- Integrating Ada, C/C++, and Rust components in single codebasenot DynamoDB
- Managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and SBOMsnot DynamoDB
- Supporting long-lived software systems spanning decadesnot DynamoDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DynamoDB
- Access patterns must be designed into the key schema before launch; a query nobody anticipated needs a new global secondary index, which is a full extra copy of the projected attributes billed as storage and as writes, or an offline migration
- Global secondary indexes are eventually consistent and cannot be read strongly, so a read-after-write against an index can legitimately miss the item that was just written, and application code must be written to tolerate that
- Per-partition throughput is capped at roughly 3,000 read and 1,000 write units, so a hot key throttles even when the table has spare capacity overall, and the only real fix is changing the key design to spread the load
- Items are limited to 400 KB and query results paginate at 1 MB, so large or list-shaped data has to be split, offloaded to S3 with a pointer, or read through pagination loops that complicate every consumer
- It runs only on AWS and the API is proprietary rather than a standard, so moving the data layer means rewriting it; ScyllaDB's Alternator is the only meaningfully compatible target and it brings a much smaller ecosystem
GNAT Pro
- No pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes
- Vendor indicates per-user, per-year subscription model but does not disclose specific costs
Pricing, plan by plan
DynamoDB
Free- On-Demand CapacityOn request
- Pay-per-request pricing with automatic scaling
- Read: 0.5 RRU per 4 KB (eventually consistent), 1 RRU per 4 KB (strongly consistent), 2 RRU per 4 KB (transactional)
- Write: 1 WRU per 1 KB
- Provisioned CapacityOn request
- Fixed hourly charges based on reserved capacity
- RCU rate: $0.00013 per hour (Standard)
- WCU rate: $0.00065 per hour (Standard)
- Standard Table Class Storage$0.25/per gb/month
- $0.25 per GB/month after free tier
- First 25 GB free per month (free tier)
- Standard-Infrequent Access Table Class$0.1/per gb/month
- $0.10 per GB/month
GNAT Pro
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GNAT Pro review.
Which should you pick?
Choose DynamoDB if
- You need managed and serverless.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS.
- You also want predictable latency.
Choose GNAT Pro if
Nothing in the data separates GNAT Pro from DynamoDB on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is DynamoDB or GNAT Pro better?
- Neither clearly leads. DynamoDB starts at Free and GNAT Pro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DynamoDB or GNAT Pro?
- DynamoDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for DynamoDB and On request for GNAT Pro.
- Does DynamoDB or GNAT Pro run on more platforms?
- DynamoDB runs on AWS. GNAT Pro runs on Web.
- Can I use DynamoDB for free?
- Yes. DynamoDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GNAT Pro starts at On request.
- What is DynamoDB best used for?
- DynamoDB is most often used for high-volume keyed workloads such as sessions, shopping carts, device state or user profiles where the access pattern is fixed and known, traffic that spikes unpredictably, where on-demand capacity absorbs a burst without a capacity-planning exercise, serverless applications on lambda, where an http-based datastore avoids the connection pooling problem relational databases have, event or telemetry ingestion where writes vastly outnumber reads and each record is retrieved by a known identifier. Of those, high-volume keyed workloads such as sessions, shopping carts, device state or user profiles where the access pattern is fixed and known and traffic that spikes unpredictably, where on-demand capacity absorbs a burst without a capacity-planning exercise are not what GNAT Pro is typically brought in for.
- What can DynamoDB do that GNAT Pro cannot?
- DynamoDB covers Managed and serverless, Predictable latency, On-demand or provisioned capacity, Global secondary indexes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DynamoDB: On-demand or provisioned capacity?
On-demand suits unpredictable or spiky traffic and removes capacity planning. Provisioned with autoscaling is considerably cheaper for steady high-volume workloads. Tables can be switched between them, though not arbitrarily often.
GNAT Pro: How much does GNAT Pro cost?
GNAT Pro pricing is not published on the website. Customers must request a pricing quote by contacting AdaCore directly or speaking with a GNAT Pro expert.
SourceDynamoDB: Can I run DynamoDB outside AWS?
No. DynamoDB Local exists for development and testing only. For a production-compatible alternative elsewhere, ScyllaDB's Alternator implements the DynamoDB API, but it is a different system with a different ecosystem.
GNAT Pro: What is GNAT Pro licensing model?
GNAT Pro is sold on a per-user, per-year basis with no license locks. Customers can request pricing for their specific needs.
SourceDynamoDB: Can I run ad hoc queries or analytics?
Not on the table itself. Scans are slow and expensive at scale. The usual pattern is to export to S3 or stream changes out and query them in Athena, Redshift or another analytical engine.
DynamoDB: Is single-table design necessary?
It is the pattern that gets the most from DynamoDB when access patterns are well known, because it lets related items be retrieved in one query. It also makes the model harder to evolve, so many teams reasonably choose multiple simpler tables and accept extra requests.
DynamoDB: What are the real limits I should design around?
400 KB per item, 1 MB per query or scan page, 100 items per transaction, roughly 3,000 read and 1,000 write units per partition, and eventual consistency on global secondary indexes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DynamoDB vs MongoDB
- DynamoDB vs Elasticsearch
- DynamoDB vs Cassandra
- DynamoDB vs BigQuery
- DynamoDB vs FaunaDB
- DynamoDB vs Memcached
- DynamoDB vs ScyllaDB
- DynamoDB vs PlanetScale
- DynamoDB vs Couchbase
- DynamoDB vs DataGrip
- DynamoDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- DynamoDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- DynamoDB vs QuestDB
- DynamoDB vs Vitess
- DynamoDB vs Aiven
- DynamoDB vs CouchDB
- DynamoDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- DynamoDB vs CosmosDB
- DynamoDB vs CLion
- DynamoDB vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- DynamoDB vs Keil MDK
- DynamoDB vs Rust
- DynamoDB vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- DynamoDB vs Penpot
- DynamoDB vs Helix
- DynamoDB vs JetBrains Rider
- DynamoDB vs Coder
- DynamoDB vs StackBlitz
- DynamoDB vs ConfigCat
- DynamoDB vs Frappe
- DynamoDB vs Bitbucket
- DynamoDB vs Claude Code
- DynamoDB vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- DynamoDB vs Cody
- DynamoDB vs Cortex
- DynamoDB vs Dagger
- GNAT Pro vs MongoDB
- GNAT Pro vs Elasticsearch
- GNAT Pro vs Cassandra
- GNAT Pro vs BigQuery
- GNAT Pro vs FaunaDB
- GNAT Pro vs Memcached
- GNAT Pro vs ScyllaDB
- GNAT Pro vs PlanetScale
- GNAT Pro vs Couchbase
- GNAT Pro vs DataGrip
- GNAT Pro vs Firebase Realtime Database
- GNAT Pro vs Microsoft SQL Server
- GNAT Pro vs QuestDB
- GNAT Pro vs Vitess
- GNAT Pro vs Aiven
- GNAT Pro vs CouchDB
- GNAT Pro vs Google Cloud SQL
- GNAT Pro vs CosmosDB
- GNAT Pro vs CLion
- GNAT Pro vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- GNAT Pro vs Keil MDK
- GNAT Pro vs Rust
- GNAT Pro vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- GNAT Pro vs Penpot
- GNAT Pro vs Helix
- GNAT Pro vs JetBrains Rider
- GNAT Pro vs Coder
- GNAT Pro vs StackBlitz
- GNAT Pro vs ConfigCat
- GNAT Pro vs Frappe
- GNAT Pro vs Bitbucket
- GNAT Pro vs Claude Code
- GNAT Pro vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- GNAT Pro vs Cody
- GNAT Pro vs Cortex
- GNAT Pro vs Dagger
