APIs · head to head
Directus vs DuckDB

Directus
APIs
Open-source data platform providing REST and GraphQL APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

DuckDB
Databases
MIT-licensed analytical SQL database that runs inside your process, with no server, no dependencies and one writer at a time.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Directus free permissive use of the self hosted product is limited to organisations under $5M annual revenue with fewer than 50 employees, so crossing either threshold turns a free dependency into a paid licence; DuckDB a database file accepts one read-write process at a time; other processes must open it read-only and will not see subsequent writes, so DuckDB cannot be the shared database behind several services.
- They diverge on capability: Directus covers REST API, DuckDB covers In-process execution.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Directus and DuckDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Directus
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- Database management
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- SQLite
- Webhooks
- Node.js support
Only in DuckDB
- In-process execution
- Vectorised columnar engine
- Direct file querying
- Zero dependencies
- Larger-than-memory queries
- MIT licence
- Postgres-flavoured SQL
- Extension ecosystem
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Directus
- Wrapping an existing SQL database in a REST and GraphQL API with an admin interfacenot DuckDB
- Running a self hosted headless CMS over a schema you already ownnot DuckDB
DuckDB
- Transformation steps in a data pipeline that would otherwise need Spark, replaced by SQL over Parquet in a single processnot Directus
- Analytical queries embedded in an application or a dashboard where shipping a database server alongside it is not acceptablenot Directus
- Local exploration of files that are too large for a pandas dataframe but far too small to justify a warehousenot Directus
- Continuous integration and testing of analytical SQL, where a real engine can run in the test process without provisioning anythingnot Directus
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Directus
- Free permissive use of the self hosted product is limited to organisations under $5M annual revenue with fewer than 50 employees, so crossing either threshold turns a free dependency into a paid licence
- The free Core tier is a hard limit of 3 seats, 25 collections and 5 flows
- The Team plan is $499 a month billed annually, or $599 monthly, with extra seats at $50 each
- Team caps collections at 50, expandable to 100, and flows at 20
DuckDB
- A database file accepts one read-write process at a time; other processes must open it read-only and will not see subsequent writes, so DuckDB cannot be the shared database behind several services.
- There is no network protocol, authentication or user management, so exposing it to remote clients means writing and securing your own service around it.
- It is built for scans and aggregations, not for many small transactions, so a workload of high-frequency single-row inserts and updates performs badly compared with SQLite or Postgres.
- Storage files are backwards compatible but not forwards compatible, so a file written by a newer version cannot be read by an older one and every consumer of a shared file must be upgraded together.
- Query memory settings matter: some operations still need to hold significant state, so an under-configured memory limit turns a large join or a high-cardinality aggregation into a spill-heavy query or an out-of-memory failure rather than a slow success.
Pricing, plan by plan
Directus
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted Directus
- Community support
- Cloud$25/monthly
- Managed cloud
- Automatic updates
- Backups
DuckDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the DuckDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Directus if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Node.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- You also want graphql api.
Choose DuckDB if
- You need in-process execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, WebAssembly.
- You also want vectorised columnar engine.
Questions people ask
- Is Directus or DuckDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Directus starts at Free and DuckDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Directus or DuckDB?
- Directus starts at Free and DuckDB at Free.
- Does Directus or DuckDB run on more platforms?
- Directus runs on Node.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker. DuckDB runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, WebAssembly.
- Can I use Directus for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Directus best used for?
- Directus is most often used for wrapping an existing sql database in a rest and graphql api with an admin interface, running a self hosted headless cms over a schema you already own. Of those, wrapping an existing sql database in a rest and graphql api with an admin interface and running a self hosted headless cms over a schema you already own are not what DuckDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Directus do that DuckDB cannot?
- Directus covers REST API, GraphQL API, Database management, PostgreSQL. DuckDB covers In-process execution, Vectorised columnar engine, Direct file querying, Zero dependencies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Directus: What is Directus's pricing?
Directus Core is free and self-hosted. The Team tier costs $499/month (annual) or $599/month (rolling), including 10 user seats and cloud hosting at $99/month additional. Enterprise plans have custom pricing. Additional seats cost $50/month each.
SourceDuckDB: Can multiple applications share one DuckDB database?
Not for writing. One process holds the database read-write; others may attach read-only and will not see later writes. Shared multi-writer access needs a different database or a table format with a catalogue.
Directus: Can I use Directus for free?
Yes, Directus Core is completely free with 3 user seats, 25 Collections, 5 Flows, AI Assistant, and Advanced RBAC. Self-hosting is available at no cost.
SourceDuckDB: Is it a replacement for a data warehouse?
For single-node analytical workloads up to a few hundred gigabytes it very often is. It is not a replacement when many concurrent users need a shared, governed, always-on service.
Directus: How many user seats does each Directus tier include?
Core includes 3 user seats, Team includes 10 SSO seats, and Enterprise includes custom SSO seat counts. Additional Team seats cost $50/seat per month.
SourceDuckDB: Do I have to load data into it?
No. It queries Parquet, CSV, JSON and Arrow in place, including on object storage. Its own storage format is optional and mainly useful when you want indexes, constraints and faster repeated access.
Directus: What happens to my monthly Directus plan if I switch?
Monthly plans are grandfathered for six months after switching, and annual plans are honored until renewal. Self-hosted licenses are handled case-by-case at renewal.
SourceDuckDB: What is MotherDuck's relationship to it?
MotherDuck is a separate company offering a managed and hybrid service built on the DuckDB engine. DuckDB itself remains MIT-licensed and independent of it, with the IP held by the DuckDB Foundation.
Directus: Is there a free trial for Directus?
No trial period is mentioned. Users can start with the free Core tier immediately without a credit card.
SourceDuckDB: Is it suitable for OLTP?
No. It is designed for analytical scans. For transactional workloads with frequent small writes, SQLite or Postgres is the right tool.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Directus vs Appwrite
- Directus vs Hasura
- Directus vs PocketBase
- Directus vs Sanity
- Directus vs Parse Server
- Directus vs Strapi
- Directus vs Gravitee
- Directus vs Payload CMS
- Directus vs KeystoneJS
- Directus vs Tyk
- Directus vs Asyncapi
- Directus vs Hoppscotch
- Directus vs Pusher
- Directus vs Salt Edge
- Directus vs Skyflow
- Directus vs Yodlee
- Directus vs Backbase
- Directus vs Enfuce
- Directus vs SingleStore
- Directus vs SQLite
- Directus vs PostgreSQL
- Directus vs Cockroach Labs
- Directus vs Airtable
- Directus vs Amazon Aurora
- Directus vs ClickHouse
- Directus vs Apache Druid
- Directus vs Firebolt
- Directus vs OpenSearch
- Directus vs StarRocks
- Directus vs DataGrip
- Directus vs Estuary
- Directus vs Apache Pinot
- Directus vs Apache Pulsar
- Directus vs Cassandra
- Directus vs CouchDB
- DuckDB vs Appwrite
- DuckDB vs Hasura
- DuckDB vs PocketBase
- DuckDB vs Sanity
- DuckDB vs Parse Server
- DuckDB vs Strapi
- DuckDB vs Gravitee
- DuckDB vs Payload CMS
- DuckDB vs KeystoneJS
- DuckDB vs Tyk
- DuckDB vs Asyncapi
- DuckDB vs Hoppscotch
- DuckDB vs Pusher
- DuckDB vs Salt Edge
- DuckDB vs Skyflow
- DuckDB vs Yodlee
- DuckDB vs Backbase
- DuckDB vs Enfuce
- DuckDB vs SingleStore
- DuckDB vs SQLite
- DuckDB vs PostgreSQL
- DuckDB vs Cockroach Labs
- DuckDB vs Airtable
- DuckDB vs Amazon Aurora
- DuckDB vs ClickHouse
- DuckDB vs Apache Druid
- DuckDB vs Firebolt
- DuckDB vs OpenSearch
- DuckDB vs StarRocks
- DuckDB vs DataGrip
- DuckDB vs Estuary
- DuckDB vs Apache Pinot
- DuckDB vs Apache Pulsar
- DuckDB vs Cassandra
- DuckDB vs CouchDB
