Insurance · head to head
Duck Creek vs IBM QRadar

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Duck Creek pricing is not published; sold by quote through a sales process; IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- They diverge on capability: Duck Creek covers Policy administration, IBM QRadar covers Offence model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Duck Creek and IBM QRadar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Duck Creek | IBM QRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Api |
| Category | Insurance | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2003 | 1911 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Duck Creek
- Policy administration
- Claims management
- Billing
- Digital customer portal
- Mobile app
- AI-powered workflows
- Real-time reporting
- Document management
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Duck Creek
- Policy administrationnot IBM QRadar
- Claims managementnot IBM QRadar
- Rating and billingnot IBM QRadar
- Underwriting automationnot IBM QRadar
- Enterprise insurance operationsnot IBM QRadar
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Duck Creek
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Duck Creek
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Duck Creek
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Duck Creek
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Duck Creek
- Pricing is not published; sold by quote through a sales process
- Cloud-only deployment; no on-premises option
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Pricing, plan by plan
Duck Creek
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Duck Creek review.
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Which should you pick?
Choose Duck Creek if
- You need policy administration.
- You also want claims management.
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Duck Creek or IBM QRadar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Duck Creek starts at On request and IBM QRadar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Duck Creek or IBM QRadar?
- Duck Creek starts at On request and IBM QRadar at On request.
- Does Duck Creek or IBM QRadar run on more platforms?
- Duck Creek runs on Web. IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api.
- What is Duck Creek best used for?
- Duck Creek is most often used for policy administration, claims management, rating and billing, underwriting automation. Of those, policy administration and claims management are not what IBM QRadar is typically brought in for.
- What can Duck Creek do that IBM QRadar cannot?
- Duck Creek covers Policy administration, Claims management, Billing, Digital customer portal. IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Duck Creek: How does Duck Creek pricing work?
Duck Creek does not publicly disclose specific pricing plans, costs, or tiers. The company directs interested parties to contact their sales team directly, as solutions are customized for individual clients.
SourceIBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Duck Creek: What Duck Creek products require pricing discussions?
Duck Creek's Intelligent Core platform (Policy, Rating, Billing, Claims) and Agentic AI Platform pricing depends on factors such as company size, deployment model (cloud vs. on-premise), implementation scope, and specific modules required.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Duck Creek: How do I get a quote from Duck Creek?
Duck Creek directs prospects to contact their sales team through a 'Talk with an Expert' button or the contact form at their website. They require direct sales engagement for pricing discussions.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Duck Creek vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Duck Creek vs Applied Epic
- Duck Creek vs Duck Creek Policy
- Duck Creek vs Majesco
- Duck Creek vs Vertafore AMS360
- Duck Creek vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- Duck Creek vs EZLynx
- Duck Creek vs Origami Risk
- Duck Creek vs Embroker
- Duck Creek vs Tarmika
- Duck Creek vs AgencyZoom
- Duck Creek vs Better Agency
- Duck Creek vs Insurity Suite
- Duck Creek vs Riskonnect
- Duck Creek vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Duck Creek vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Duck Creek vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Duck Creek vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Duck Creek vs 1Password
- Duck Creek vs Norton 360
- Duck Creek vs LastPass
- Duck Creek vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Duck Creek vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Duck Creek vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Duck Creek vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Duck Creek vs Recorded Future
- Duck Creek vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Duck Creek vs Proofpoint
- Duck Creek vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Duck Creek vs Arnica
- Duck Creek vs Authelia
- Duck Creek vs Authy
- Duck Creek vs Baffle
- Duck Creek vs Beyond Identity
- Duck Creek vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- IBM QRadar vs Applied Epic
- IBM QRadar vs Duck Creek Policy
- IBM QRadar vs Majesco
- IBM QRadar vs Vertafore AMS360
- IBM QRadar vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- IBM QRadar vs EZLynx
- IBM QRadar vs Origami Risk
- IBM QRadar vs Embroker
- IBM QRadar vs Tarmika
- IBM QRadar vs AgencyZoom
- IBM QRadar vs Better Agency
- IBM QRadar vs Insurity Suite
- IBM QRadar vs Riskonnect
- IBM QRadar vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- IBM QRadar vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- IBM QRadar vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust

