Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Insurity Suite

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Insurity Suite
Insurance
End-to-end insurance software for modern carriers
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Insurity Suite subscription pricing based on modules and users with no transparent public pricing
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Insurity Suite covers Policy lifecycle management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Insurity Suite actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Insurity Suite |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, Api, Mobile |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Insurance |
| Founded | 1911 | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Insurity Suite
- Policy lifecycle management
- Claims automation
- Billing and payments
- Document management
- Underwriting workbench
- Reinsurance management
- Regulatory compliance
- Analytics dashboard
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Insurity Suite
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Insurity Suite
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Insurity Suite
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Insurity Suite
Insurity Suite
- Policy administrationnot IBM QRadar
- Claims processingnot IBM QRadar
- Digital transformationnot IBM QRadar
- Legacy modernizationnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Insurity Suite
- Subscription pricing based on modules and users with no transparent public pricing
- Requires significant implementation and configuration to launch new products
- Targeted primarily at MGAs and specialty carriers, not small independent agents
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Insurity Suite
On request- Core$undefined/month
- Policy administration
- Claims processing
- Billing management
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- All Core features
- Advanced analytics
- Custom integrations
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Insurity Suite if
- You need policy lifecycle management.
- You work on Web, Api, Mobile.
- You also want claims automation.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Insurity Suite better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Insurity Suite at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Insurity Suite?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and Insurity Suite at On request.
- Does IBM QRadar or Insurity Suite run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Insurity Suite runs on Web, Api, Mobile.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Insurity Suite is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Insurity Suite cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Insurity Suite covers Policy lifecycle management, Claims automation, Billing and payments, Document management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Insurity Suite: What does Insurity Pro Suite provide?
Insurity Pro Suite is a modular core platform for growing carriers and MGAs, providing enterprise-grade policy administration, integrated billing and accounting, and end-to-end claims management. It supports 20+ commercial and personal lines, E&S, and Lloyd's products.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Insurity Suite: What is Insurity's Sure Personal Suite?
Insurity Sure Personal Suite provides cost-effective policy, billing, and claims solutions specifically designed for personal lines property and casualty carriers.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Insurity Suite: Does Insurity use AI for underwriting?
Yes. Insurity Pro Suite includes an AI-powered risk assistant that identifies profitable submissions through risk scoring, evaluates submission data using artificial intelligence, and provides instant profitability scores to prioritize high-value risks.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
Insurity Suite: What claims processing speed does Insurity deliver?
Insurity enables digital claims payments that issue claim settlements in under thirty seconds via integrated ACH, virtual cards, or real-time payment processing rails.
SourceIBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Insurity Suite: Does Insurity offer workflow configuration without coding?
Yes. Insurity provides workflow configuration that allows business users to modify underwriting and claims workflows through a visual interface without requiring software code or IT involvement.
SourceRelated pages
More on Insurity Suite
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- IBM QRadar vs Duck Creek Policy
- IBM QRadar vs INSTANDA
- IBM QRadar vs EIS Group
- IBM QRadar vs BriteCore
- IBM QRadar vs Applied Epic
- IBM QRadar vs Origami Risk
- IBM QRadar vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- IBM QRadar vs Socotra
- IBM QRadar vs Shift Technology
- IBM QRadar vs Riskonnect
- IBM QRadar vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- IBM QRadar vs Snapsheet Claims
- IBM QRadar vs Bold Penguin
- IBM QRadar vs Bolt Solutions
- IBM QRadar vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- IBM QRadar vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Insurity Suite vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Insurity Suite vs 1Password
- Insurity Suite vs Norton 360
- Insurity Suite vs LastPass
- Insurity Suite vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Insurity Suite vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Insurity Suite vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Insurity Suite vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Insurity Suite vs Recorded Future
- Insurity Suite vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Insurity Suite vs Proofpoint
- Insurity Suite vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Insurity Suite vs Arnica
- Insurity Suite vs Authelia
- Insurity Suite vs Authy
- Insurity Suite vs Baffle
- Insurity Suite vs Beyond Identity
- Insurity Suite vs BeyondTrust
- Insurity Suite vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Insurity Suite vs Duck Creek Policy
- Insurity Suite vs INSTANDA
- Insurity Suite vs EIS Group
- Insurity Suite vs BriteCore
- Insurity Suite vs Applied Epic
- Insurity Suite vs Origami Risk
- Insurity Suite vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Insurity Suite vs Socotra
- Insurity Suite vs Shift Technology
- Insurity Suite vs Riskonnect
- Insurity Suite vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- Insurity Suite vs Snapsheet Claims
- Insurity Suite vs Bold Penguin
- Insurity Suite vs Bolt Solutions
- Insurity Suite vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Insurity Suite vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
