Agriculture · head to head
DroneDeploy vs Sitemark

DroneDeploy
Agriculture
Drone mapping and analytics for agriculture
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -

Sitemark
Construction
Drone-based progress tracking, quality control and commissioning built specifically for solar farms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DroneDeploy sold as annual subscriptions rather than monthly, at $1,908 a year for the agriculture plan; Sitemark it only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- They diverge on capability: DroneDeploy covers Automated flight planning, Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DroneDeploy and Sitemark actually diverge.
| Attribute | DroneDeploy | Sitemark |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Category | Agriculture | Construction |
| Founded | 2013 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, Ios, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DroneDeploy
- Automated flight planning
- Orthomosaic maps
- NDVI analysis
- 3D modeling
- Progress tracking
- DJI
- John Deere
- Climate FieldView
Only in Sitemark
- Construction progress tracking
- As-built versus design comparison
- Thermographic inspection
- Defect localisation
- Commissioning workflows
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
- Drone and robotics ingestion
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DroneDeploy
- Mapping fields with drone imagery for crop health analysisnot Sitemark
- Producing stand counts and plant health indices from aerial surveysnot Sitemark
Sitemark
- An EPC contractor on a multi-hundred-megawatt ground-mount plant that must report weekly installed counts to a lender and cannot do it by walking the rowsnot DroneDeploy
- An asset owner accepting a plant at provisional acceptance who needs documented evidence that what was built matches the issued design before signingnot DroneDeploy
- An operations team running annual thermographic inspection across a portfolio, wanting defects mapped to module positions so a technician goes straight to the faultnot DroneDeploy
- A developer comparing defect and underperformance rates across contractors and module suppliers to inform the next procurement roundnot DroneDeploy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DroneDeploy
- Sold as annual subscriptions rather than monthly, at $1,908 a year for the agriculture plan
- Images per map are capped by plan, at 1,000 on Ag Lite and 3,000 on the general individual plan
- The Ag Lite plan is limited to the VARI index for RGB plant health rather than the full analysis set
- Ground capture processing is excluded from every published individual plan
- Team plans publish no price at all and require a custom quote
Sitemark
- It only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- Pricing is quoted on site count and unpublished variables, which penalises owners of many small distributed assets relative to one operator of a single large plant with the same total capacity.
- You still need someone to fly the site, and Sitemark does not remove the drone operator cost, permits or airspace constraints; it monetises the data after the flight.
- Automated progress counting depends on a clean, current design layout, and on projects where the layout changes weekly the comparison generates false deviations that erode trust in the numbers.
- Thermographic defect detection needs the plant producing at sufficient irradiance, so inspection windows in northern latitudes are narrow and a missed window pushes findings into the next season.
Pricing, plan by plan
DroneDeploy
$29/month- Individual$299/month
- Unlimited maps
- 3D models
- Basic analytics
- Business$599/month
- Team features
- NDVI analysis
- API access
Sitemark
On request- Sitemark Construction$undefined/year
- Priced on number of sites and other variables
- Progress tracking across construction activities
- As-built versus design quality control
- Sitemark Operations$undefined/year
- Thermographic inspection and defect detection
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose DroneDeploy if
- You need automated flight planning.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want orthomosaic maps.
Choose Sitemark if
- You need construction progress tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want as-built versus design comparison.
Questions people ask
- Is DroneDeploy or Sitemark better?
- Neither clearly leads. DroneDeploy starts at $29/month and Sitemark at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DroneDeploy or Sitemark?
- DroneDeploy starts at $29/month and Sitemark at On request.
- Does DroneDeploy or Sitemark run on more platforms?
- DroneDeploy runs on Web, Ios, Android. Sitemark runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is DroneDeploy best used for?
- DroneDeploy is most often used for mapping fields with drone imagery for crop health analysis, producing stand counts and plant health indices from aerial surveys. Of those, mapping fields with drone imagery for crop health analysis and producing stand counts and plant health indices from aerial surveys are not what Sitemark is typically brought in for.
- What can DroneDeploy do that Sitemark cannot?
- DroneDeploy covers Automated flight planning, Orthomosaic maps, NDVI analysis, 3D modeling. Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking, As-built versus design comparison, Thermographic inspection, Defect localisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DroneDeploy: What is the cost of DroneDeploy's Flight & Analysis plan for individual pilots?
The Flight & Analysis Plan costs $4,188/year billed annually for a single user license, with support for up to 3,000 images per map and email/live chat support.
SourceSitemark: Is Sitemark priced per megawatt?
No. Sitemark states pricing is based on number of sites and other variables. Ask explicitly how a portfolio of small sites is treated, because per-site pricing is unkind to distributed assets.
DroneDeploy: Does DroneDeploy have a specialized agriculture plan?
Yes. The Ag Lite Plan costs $1,908/year and is designed for agriculture pilots with up to 1,000 images per map, stand count analysis, and plant health tools.
SourceSitemark: Do we have to use Sitemark drone pilots?
No. It accepts data from third-party drone operators, which lets you keep an existing flight contractor.
DroneDeploy: How long is the DroneDeploy free trial?
DroneDeploy offers a 14-day free trial with no credit card required.
SourceSitemark: Does it cover anything other than solar?
No. It is built specifically around solar plant structures and defect types.
DroneDeploy: Can I cancel my DroneDeploy subscription early?
Yes. DroneDeploy billing is flexible with monthly or annual payment options (annual offers savings). Cancellations take effect at your billing cycle end. After cancellation, you retain basic data access for 30 days.
SourceSitemark: Can we export our data?
Yes, orthomosaics, defect lists and reports export. Confirm the format and whether historical inspections remain accessible after a subscription lapses.
DroneDeploy: What is the image upload limit on DroneDeploy's Advanced Flight & Analysis plan?
The Advanced Flight & Analysis Plan has a 10,000 image upload limit and includes cut/fill analysis, thermal imaging, and unlimited Google Cloud Print mapping. This plan requires a custom quote.
SourceSitemark: Where is the company based?
Leuven, Belgium, with customers across Europe, the Middle East, Asia and the Americas.
Related pages
More on DroneDeploy
Other head to heads
- DroneDeploy vs AgriSync
- DroneDeploy vs CropX
- DroneDeploy vs Granular
- DroneDeploy vs Bushel
- DroneDeploy vs FarmLogs
- DroneDeploy vs PrecisionHawk
- DroneDeploy vs DJI Agriculture
- DroneDeploy vs Pix4Dfields
- DroneDeploy vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- DroneDeploy vs Growers Edge
- DroneDeploy vs Farmbrite
- DroneDeploy vs Cropio
- DroneDeploy vs Case IH AFS Connect
- DroneDeploy vs CeresAI
- DroneDeploy vs Cropin
- DroneDeploy vs FarmCommand
- DroneDeploy vs Farmers Business Network (FBN)
- DroneDeploy vs Reconstruct
- DroneDeploy vs Dalux
- DroneDeploy vs Buildots
- DroneDeploy vs Propeller Aero
- DroneDeploy vs Skydio Dock for X10
- DroneDeploy vs B2W Estimate
- DroneDeploy vs HCSS HeavyBid
- DroneDeploy vs Primavera P6
- DroneDeploy vs Smartsheet
- DroneDeploy vs Vectorworks Architect
- DroneDeploy vs Buildertrend
- DroneDeploy vs Adaptive
- DroneDeploy vs Document Crunch
- DroneDeploy vs GCPay
- DroneDeploy vs HammerTech
- DroneDeploy vs Handoff
- DroneDeploy vs Houzz Pro
- Sitemark vs AgriSync
- Sitemark vs CropX
- Sitemark vs Granular
- Sitemark vs Bushel
- Sitemark vs FarmLogs
- Sitemark vs PrecisionHawk
- Sitemark vs DJI Agriculture
- Sitemark vs Pix4Dfields
- Sitemark vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Sitemark vs Growers Edge
- Sitemark vs Farmbrite
- Sitemark vs Cropio
- Sitemark vs Case IH AFS Connect
- Sitemark vs CeresAI
- Sitemark vs Cropin
- Sitemark vs FarmCommand
- Sitemark vs Farmers Business Network (FBN)
- Sitemark vs Reconstruct
- Sitemark vs Dalux
- Sitemark vs Buildots
- Sitemark vs Propeller Aero
- Sitemark vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Sitemark vs B2W Estimate
- Sitemark vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Sitemark vs Primavera P6
- Sitemark vs Smartsheet
- Sitemark vs Vectorworks Architect
- Sitemark vs Buildertrend
- Sitemark vs Adaptive
- Sitemark vs Document Crunch
- Sitemark vs GCPay
- Sitemark vs HammerTech
- Sitemark vs Handoff
- Sitemark vs Houzz Pro
