No-Code · head to head
Directual vs Toqio

Directual
No-Code
No-code backend with a visual workflow engine, used behind other tools rather than instead of them
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Toqio
APIs
No code platform for building embedded finance products on your own providers
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Directual has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Directual the front-end builder is basic, so any project needing a designed interface means learning and paying for a second tool, and time to launch is closer to a two-system build than a one-tool build.; Toqio toqio holds no licence and provides no sponsor bank, so you must find, contract and manage regulated providers yourself, which is the slowest part of any embedded finance launch.
- They diverge on capability: Directual covers Visual database designer, Toqio covers No code product builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Directual and Toqio actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (quote), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Directual
- Visual database designer
- Scenario builder
- Generated API endpoints
- Event-driven triggers
- Role and permission model
- Scheduled jobs
- Basic web page builder
- Self-hosted deployment
Only in Toqio
- No code product builder
- Provider orchestration
- Account and card modules
- Embedded financing
- Back office tooling
- Multi entity and multi brand
- White label mobile apps
- Marketplace of providers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Directual
- Providing the backend for a Webflow or FlutterFlow front end that needs real data, authentication and logicnot Toqio
- Replacing an Airtable base that has outgrown its row limits without hiring a backend developernot Toqio
- Event-driven workflows such as order processing or scheduled billing runs that must run without a person triggering themnot Toqio
- Organisations with a data residency requirement that rules out most no-code platforms, using the self-hosted tiernot Toqio
Toqio
- A manufacturer offering branded working capital finance to its dealer networknot Directual
- A B2B marketplace launching accounts and cards for its sellers without becoming regulated itselfnot Directual
- A corporate that wants to switch card issuer without rebuilding its customer facing productnot Directual
- A group launching the same embedded finance product across several markets with different local providersnot Directual
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Directual
- The front-end builder is basic, so any project needing a designed interface means learning and paying for a second tool, and time to launch is closer to a two-system build than a one-tool build.
- Visual scenarios become unreadable once the logic is non-trivial; a workflow that would be forty lines of code sprawls across a canvas, and reviewing what a colleague built is slow.
- Debugging asynchronous, event-triggered scenarios is harder than debugging code, because failures surface as records left in an unexpected state rather than as a stack trace at the point of failure.
- Self-hosting is confined to the top commercial tier, so the ownership advantage is available only to buyers already spending at the high end.
- The pool of agencies and freelancers who know Directual is small next to Bubble or Airtable, so handing a finished system to someone else to maintain is harder and more expensive.
Toqio
- Toqio holds no licence and provides no sponsor bank, so you must find, contract and manage regulated providers yourself, which is the slowest part of any embedded finance launch.
- Because it orchestrates rather than provides, the customer experience is only as good as the underlying bank or issuer, and Toqio cannot fix a partner's settlement delays or outages.
- Pricing is quoted with no public rate card, so comparing it against building in house or against a bundled banking as a service provider requires a full sales process.
- With around EUR 30 million raised in total it is a small supplier to underpin a financial product a large corporate expects to run for a decade, which raises real continuity questions in procurement.
- No code configuration covers standard patterns well but bespoke customer journeys eventually require custom development, at which point the main advantage over building directly on provider APIs narrows.
Pricing, plan by plan
Directual
Free- Directual$undefined/month
- Free tier with capped records and API calls
- Paid tiers priced by database rows, API calls and scenario runs
- Self-hosted deployment on the top tier only
Toqio
On request- Toqio platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per customer, typically setup plus recurring platform fee
- Regulated provider fees are separate and contracted by you
- Card interchange and lending economics belong to your provider agreements
Which should you pick?
Choose Directual if
- You need visual database designer.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want scenario builder.
Choose Toqio if
- You need no code product builder.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want provider orchestration.
Questions people ask
- Is Directual or Toqio better?
- Neither clearly leads. Directual starts at Free and Toqio at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Directual or Toqio?
- Directual has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Directual and On request for Toqio.
- Does Directual or Toqio run on more platforms?
- Directual runs on Web. Toqio runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- Can I use Directual for free?
- Yes. Directual has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Toqio starts at On request.
- What is Directual best used for?
- Directual is most often used for providing the backend for a webflow or flutterflow front end that needs real data, authentication and logic, replacing an airtable base that has outgrown its row limits without hiring a backend developer, event-driven workflows such as order processing or scheduled billing runs that must run without a person triggering them, organisations with a data residency requirement that rules out most no-code platforms, using the self-hosted tier. Of those, providing the backend for a webflow or flutterflow front end that needs real data, authentication and logic and replacing an airtable base that has outgrown its row limits without hiring a backend developer are not what Toqio is typically brought in for.
- What can Directual do that Toqio cannot?
- Directual covers Visual database designer, Scenario builder, Generated API endpoints, Event-driven triggers. Toqio covers No code product builder, Provider orchestration, Account and card modules, Embedded financing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Directual: Is Directual a replacement for Bubble?
Not directly. Bubble builds the whole application; Directual builds the backend and expects you to bring a front end such as Webflow or FlutterFlow.
Toqio: Does Toqio provide the banking licence?
No, deliberately. You contract your own bank, issuer or lender, which is why you can replace them without rebuilding the product.
Directual: Can I host it myself?
Yes, on the top commercial tier. That is unusual in no-code and it is the main reason regulated buyers look at it at all.
Toqio: Who is it aimed at?
Large corporates and B2B ecosystem operators embedding finance for suppliers, dealers or marketplace sellers, not consumer fintech startups.
Directual: How does it cope with large data volumes?
It is built on a real database with indexing rather than a spreadsheet abstraction, so record counts that break Airtable-class tools are within its normal range.
Toqio: How much does it cost?
Not published. Expect a setup fee plus a recurring platform fee, with all regulated provider costs on top and separately contracted.
Directual: What happens to my logic if I leave?
The data exports and the API is documented, but scenarios are platform-specific and have to be reimplemented, unless you are already on the self-hosted tier.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Directual vs Bubble
- Directual vs Quickbase
- Directual vs Zoho Creator
- Directual vs WeWeb
- Directual vs FlutterFlow
- Directual vs Caspio
- Directual vs Momen
- Directual vs Stacker
- Directual vs Mendix
- Directual vs Appian
- Directual vs Whalesync
- Directual vs Corteza
- Directual vs Superblocks
- Directual vs ToolJet
- Directual vs Draftbit
- Directual vs Highnote
- Directual vs Unit
- Directual vs Solaris
- Directual vs Thredd
- Directual vs Swan
- Directual vs Weavr
- Directual vs Fintech Farm
- Directual vs Lithic
- Directual vs Vodeno
- Directual vs Column
- Directual vs Synctera
- Directual vs Astra
- Directual vs Marqeta
- Directual vs Meniga
- Directual vs Moov
- Directual vs MX Technologies
- Directual vs PubNub
- Directual vs Skaleet
- Toqio vs Bubble
- Toqio vs Quickbase
- Toqio vs Zoho Creator
- Toqio vs WeWeb
- Toqio vs FlutterFlow
- Toqio vs Caspio
- Toqio vs Momen
- Toqio vs Stacker
- Toqio vs Mendix
- Toqio vs Appian
- Toqio vs Whalesync
- Toqio vs Corteza
- Toqio vs Superblocks
- Toqio vs ToolJet
- Toqio vs Draftbit
- Toqio vs Highnote
- Toqio vs Unit
- Toqio vs Solaris
- Toqio vs Thredd
- Toqio vs Swan
- Toqio vs Weavr
- Toqio vs Fintech Farm
- Toqio vs Lithic
- Toqio vs Vodeno
- Toqio vs Column
- Toqio vs Synctera
- Toqio vs Astra
- Toqio vs Marqeta
- Toqio vs Meniga
- Toqio vs Moov
- Toqio vs MX Technologies
- Toqio vs PubNub
- Toqio vs Skaleet
