Directualvs
Bubble


Bubble: Pick Bubble if you want one tool for both front end and backend, with a much larger ecosystem of plugins and agencies.

No-code backend with a visual workflow engine, used behind other tools rather than instead of them
As of 31 August 2026, Directual is free to use. A backend platform: database, generated API endpoints and a visual workflow engine, with only a basic front-end builder. Softwr lists it under No-Code. Directual is available on Web.
Overview
Directual is a no-code platform aimed at the server side. You define a database schema, build API endpoints over it, and construct business logic as scenarios: visual workflows made of steps that read and write data, call external services, run on a schedule or fire on a database event. A page builder exists but is deliberately secondary, and most real implementations use Directual as the backend for a front end built somewhere else. Two things distinguish it commercially. First, being backend-only fits the shape most projects actually end up with: a designed front end in Webflow or FlutterFlow talking to an API, rather than one vendor owning the whole stack. Second, and more important for ownership, the platform can be deployed on your own infrastructure on the top plan, so the data and logic do not have to live with the vendor permanently. Most no-code platforms have no answer at all to that question; this one has an answer, at a price. Buyers are technical founders, agencies and internal teams that want API-backed applications without writing server code, particularly where record volume is beyond what Airtable-class tools handle. The trade-off is that you are still assembling a stack: Directual plus a front-end tool plus the design work that implies, so the build is two systems to learn rather than one, and visual workflows become genuinely hard to read once a scenario grows past a single screen.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Directual.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Bubble: Pick Bubble if you want one tool for both front end and backend, with a much larger ecosystem of plugins and agencies.


Backendless: Pick Backendless for another backend-first platform with real-time database features and its own mobile SDKs and hosting.


Budibase: Pick Budibase if the goal is internal tools over existing databases and you want an open source, self-hostable option from the start rather than only at the top tier.
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Directual
On request
Capabilities
Visual database designer
Defines objects, fields and relations with indexing, sized for large record counts
Scenario builder
Business logic as visual workflows triggered by events, schedules or API calls
Generated API endpoints
Publishes read and write endpoints over your data with per-endpoint authentication
Event-driven triggers
Runs logic when a record changes rather than only when something is requested
Role and permission model
Controls access at object and field level for API consumers
Scheduled jobs
Runs recurring work such as billing cycles or data syncs without an external scheduler
Basic web page builder
Renders simple admin screens where a designed front end is unnecessary
Self-hosted deployment
Available on the top tier for teams that cannot keep data on vendor infrastructure
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Not directly. Bubble builds the whole application; Directual builds the backend and expects you to bring a front end such as Webflow or FlutterFlow.
Yes, on the top commercial tier. That is unusual in no-code and it is the main reason regulated buyers look at it at all.
It is built on a real database with indexing rather than a spreadsheet abstraction, so record counts that break Airtable-class tools are within its normal range.
The data exports and the API is documented, but scenarios are platform-specific and have to be reimplemented, unless you are already on the self-hosted tier.
Keep looking
No-code application platform with published per-user pricing and enforced minimum seat counts
Low-code app builder priced per user per month, bundled into the wider Zoho ecosystem
Front-end builder for applications whose data already lives somewhere else
Visual builder that outputs real Flutter code for iOS, Android and web
No-code database app platform charging by data records and DataPages rather than by user seats
Full-stack web app builder with its own Postgres database and a GraphQL API over your tables
Permissioned portals over data that stays in Airtable, Salesforce or Postgres
Siemens-owned low-code platform priced by app count, with cloud infrastructure billed separately
Low-code process automation platform priced per user, per app, per month, with tier limits on data and AI volume
Two-way real-time sync between no-code databases and SaaS tools
Apache-licensed open source low-code platform, formerly Crust, positioned against Salesforce
AI-assisted platform for building internal tools and business apps
Open-source low-code platform for building internal tools and business apps
Visual builder for React Native apps that exports the source code you keep
Front-end builder for applications whose data already lives somewhere else
Two-way real-time sync between no-code databases and SaaS tools
Apache-licensed open source low-code platform, formerly Crust, positioned against Salesforce
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Directual, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
No-code application platform with published per-user pricing and enforced minimum seat counts
Per user per month, billed annually, with an enforced minimum seat count per tierEnterprise low-code platform priced by application complexity units, not just users
Application Object consumption plus internal and external user packsNo-code, drag-and-drop mobile app builder priced by AI tokens and project counts
Per month, tiered by AI token allowance and project countLow-code app builder priced per user per month, bundled into the wider Zoho ecosystem
Per user per month, billed annuallyNo-code database app platform charging by data records and DataPages rather than by user seats
Flat monthly fee by data record volume and DataPage count, unlimited users includedSiemens-owned low-code platform priced by app count, with cloud infrastructure billed separately
Per application tier (One App vs Unlimited Apps), cloud infrastructure billed separatelyLow-code process automation platform priced per user, per app, per month, with tier limits on data and AI volume
Per user, per app, per month, escalating across Standard, Advanced and Premium tiers