No-Code · head to head
Directual vs Lithic

Directual
No-Code
No-code backend with a visual workflow engine, used behind other tools rather than instead of them
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Lithic
APIs
API-first card issuing platform with direct Visa, Mastercard and Amex network connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Directual has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Directual the front-end builder is basic, so any project needing a designed interface means learning and paying for a second tool, and time to launch is closer to a two-system build than a one-tool build.; Lithic pricing is entirely undisclosed, so a company cannot compare total cost against Marqeta, Galileo or Highnote without a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Directual covers Visual database designer, Lithic covers Direct network connections.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Directual and Lithic actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (quote), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Directual
- Visual database designer
- Scenario builder
- Generated API endpoints
- Event-driven triggers
- Role and permission model
- Scheduled jobs
- Basic web page builder
- Self-hosted deployment
Only in Lithic
- Direct network connections
- Processor Client mode
- Lithic Program Management
- Card lifecycle APIs
- Sandbox environment
- Real-time authorization controls
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Directual
- Providing the backend for a Webflow or FlutterFlow front end that needs real data, authentication and logicnot Lithic
- Replacing an Airtable base that has outgrown its row limits without hiring a backend developernot Lithic
- Event-driven workflows such as order processing or scheduled billing runs that must run without a person triggering themnot Lithic
- Organisations with a data residency requirement that rules out most no-code platforms, using the self-hosted tiernot Lithic
Lithic
- A fintech wanting direct Visa or Mastercard network access rather than routing through a third-party processornot Directual
- A company that already holds its own issuing licence and wants API access without full programme managementnot Directual
- A neobank or expense platform wanting Lithic to manage bank and network relationships end to endnot Directual
- A product team prototyping a card programme in sandbox before committing to a launchnot Directual
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Directual
- The front-end builder is basic, so any project needing a designed interface means learning and paying for a second tool, and time to launch is closer to a two-system build than a one-tool build.
- Visual scenarios become unreadable once the logic is non-trivial; a workflow that would be forty lines of code sprawls across a canvas, and reviewing what a colleague built is slow.
- Debugging asynchronous, event-triggered scenarios is harder than debugging code, because failures surface as records left in an unexpected state rather than as a stack trace at the point of failure.
- Self-hosting is confined to the top commercial tier, so the ownership advantage is available only to buyers already spending at the high end.
- The pool of agencies and freelancers who know Directual is small next to Bubble or Airtable, so handing a finished system to someone else to maintain is harder and more expensive.
Lithic
- Pricing is entirely undisclosed, so a company cannot compare total cost against Marqeta, Galileo or Highnote without a sales conversation.
- Choosing Processor Client mode still leaves the company responsible for holding its own issuing licence and managing the regulatory relationship, which is a substantial undertaking many teams underestimate.
- As with any card infrastructure provider, an outage or network issue at Lithic becomes a direct outage for every card programme built on it, and a customer has limited visibility into root cause during an incident.
- Building a card programme on API infrastructure requires real engineering investment; it is not a plug-and-play product for a non-technical team.
- Switching card infrastructure providers after launch is a major undertaking involving card reissuance and programme migration, so the initial choice carries lasting lock-in.
Pricing, plan by plan
Directual
Free- Directual$undefined/month
- Free tier with capped records and API calls
- Paid tiers priced by database rows, API calls and scenario runs
- Self-hosted deployment on the top tier only
Lithic
On request- Lithic$undefined/year
- Volume and interchange-based pricing, not published
- Separate Processor Client and Program Management pricing tracks
- Custom quote required via sales
Which should you pick?
Choose Directual if
- You need visual database designer.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want scenario builder.
Choose Lithic if
- You need direct network connections.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want processor client mode.
Questions people ask
- Is Directual or Lithic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Directual starts at Free and Lithic at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Directual or Lithic?
- Directual has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Directual and On request for Lithic.
- Does Directual or Lithic run on more platforms?
- Directual runs on Web. Lithic runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Directual for free?
- Yes. Directual has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Lithic starts at On request.
- What is Directual best used for?
- Directual is most often used for providing the backend for a webflow or flutterflow front end that needs real data, authentication and logic, replacing an airtable base that has outgrown its row limits without hiring a backend developer, event-driven workflows such as order processing or scheduled billing runs that must run without a person triggering them, organisations with a data residency requirement that rules out most no-code platforms, using the self-hosted tier. Of those, providing the backend for a webflow or flutterflow front end that needs real data, authentication and logic and replacing an airtable base that has outgrown its row limits without hiring a backend developer are not what Lithic is typically brought in for.
- What can Directual do that Lithic cannot?
- Directual covers Visual database designer, Scenario builder, Generated API endpoints, Event-driven triggers. Lithic covers Direct network connections, Processor Client mode, Lithic Program Management, Card lifecycle APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Directual: Is Directual a replacement for Bubble?
Not directly. Bubble builds the whole application; Directual builds the backend and expects you to bring a front end such as Webflow or FlutterFlow.
Lithic: Does Lithic publish pricing?
No, pricing is volume-based and requires a sales conversation.
Directual: Can I host it myself?
Yes, on the top commercial tier. That is unusual in no-code and it is the main reason regulated buyers look at it at all.
Lithic: What is the difference between Processor Client and Program Management?
Processor Client suits companies with their own issuing licence and bank relationships; Program Management is for companies wanting Lithic to coordinate those relationships on their behalf.
Directual: How does it cope with large data volumes?
It is built on a real database with indexing rather than a spreadsheet abstraction, so record counts that break Airtable-class tools are within its normal range.
Lithic: Which networks does it connect to?
Visa, Mastercard and American Express directly.
Directual: What happens to my logic if I leave?
The data exports and the API is documented, but scenarios are platform-specific and have to be reimplemented, unless you are already on the self-hosted tier.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Directual vs Bubble
- Directual vs Quickbase
- Directual vs Zoho Creator
- Directual vs WeWeb
- Directual vs FlutterFlow
- Directual vs Caspio
- Directual vs Momen
- Directual vs Stacker
- Directual vs Mendix
- Directual vs Appian
- Directual vs Whalesync
- Directual vs Corteza
- Directual vs Superblocks
- Directual vs ToolJet
- Directual vs Draftbit
- Directual vs Thredd
- Directual vs Tribe Payments
- Directual vs Unit
- Directual vs Highnote
- Directual vs Vodeno
- Directual vs Swan
- Directual vs Treasury Prime
- Directual vs Marqeta
- Directual vs Synctera
- Directual vs Weavr
- Directual vs Increase
- Directual vs i2c
- Directual vs Brite Payments
- Directual vs Bruno
- Directual vs Bud Financial
- Directual vs Episode Six
- Directual vs Kong Gateway
- Lithic vs Bubble
- Lithic vs Quickbase
- Lithic vs Zoho Creator
- Lithic vs WeWeb
- Lithic vs FlutterFlow
- Lithic vs Caspio
- Lithic vs Momen
- Lithic vs Stacker
- Lithic vs Mendix
- Lithic vs Appian
- Lithic vs Whalesync
- Lithic vs Corteza
- Lithic vs Superblocks
- Lithic vs ToolJet
- Lithic vs Draftbit
- Lithic vs Thredd
- Lithic vs Tribe Payments
- Lithic vs Unit
- Lithic vs Highnote
- Lithic vs Vodeno
- Lithic vs Swan
- Lithic vs Treasury Prime
- Lithic vs Marqeta
- Lithic vs Synctera
- Lithic vs Weavr
- Lithic vs Increase
- Lithic vs i2c
- Lithic vs Brite Payments
- Lithic vs Bruno
- Lithic vs Bud Financial
- Lithic vs Episode Six
- Lithic vs Kong Gateway
