Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs RisingWave

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

RisingWave
Databases
Streaming database that maintains incremental materialised views in SQL instead of Flink jobs
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Depot is a cloud-based CI/CD platform.
- Free plans on both; paid from $20/mo and $0.227/mo.
- Only Depot lists Depot CI; only RisingWave lists SQL materialised views.
- Where Depot falls short: developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and RisingWave actually diverge.
| Attribute | Depot | RisingWave |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, GitHub, API | Linux, Self-hosted, Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Databases |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: pricing model for Depot, founded for RisingWave.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in RisingWave
- SQL materialised views
- Postgres wire compatibility
- Object storage state
- Source connectors
- Sink connectors
- Iceberg tables
- Watermarks and windowing
- User defined functions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot RisingWave
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot RisingWave
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot RisingWave
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot RisingWave
RisingWave
- A team with Kafka topics that needs continuously fresh aggregates for a dashboard without standing up a Flink clusternot Depot
- A fraud or risk team maintaining rolling counters and joins across event streams expressed as SQL viewsnot Depot
- A company doing Postgres CDC into a real-time denormalised view for search or servingnot Depot
- An analytics group that wants streaming results landed directly into Apache Iceberg without a separate writer jobnot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
RisingWave
- Anything that does not fit SQL, such as custom windowing, complex event processing or heavy stateful logic, still needs Flink, so RisingWave often adds a system rather than removing one
- The Apache 2.0 community edition excludes premium features behind a licence key, and which capabilities sit on which side of that line moves between releases, so a self-hosted plan can be invalidated by an upgrade
- Long-running materialised views accumulate state in object storage, and cost and recovery time grow with retention in ways that are hard to forecast before you are in production
- The Postgres compatibility is protocol level; it is not a transactional Postgres and using it as a general purpose database, with point updates or high write concurrency, goes badly
- It is a comparatively young venture-funded project competing with Flink, Materialize and warehouse-native streaming, and the ecosystem of connectors, operators and third-party expertise is much thinner
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/mo
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/mo
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- BusinessOn request
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
RisingWave
Free- Community EditionFree
- Apache 2.0 licence, self-hosted
- Core streaming engine and connectors
- Premium features excluded and require a licence key
- Cloud Basic$0.227/hour
- Billed per RisingWave Unit hour
- Hosted on AWS, GCP or Azure
- Capped at 64 cores
- Cloud ProOn request
- No core limit
- Bring your own cloud option
- Premium features included
- Self-managed EnterpriseOn request
- On premises or Kubernetes
- Premium features unlocked by licence
- Annual contract with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, API.
- You also want container builds.
Choose RisingWave if
- You need sql materialised views.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Self-hosted, Web.
- You also want postgres wire compatibility.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or RisingWave better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and RisingWave at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or RisingWave?
- Depot starts at Free and RisingWave at Free.
- Does Depot or RisingWave run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Web, GitHub, API. RisingWave runs on Linux, Self-hosted, Web.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what RisingWave is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that RisingWave cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching. RisingWave covers SQL materialised views, Postgres wire compatibility, Object storage state, Source connectors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceRisingWave: Is RisingWave open source?
The community edition is Apache 2.0 and self-hostable, but a set of premium features requires a paid licence key.
Depot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceRisingWave: What does the cloud cost?
It starts at 0.227 US dollars per RisingWave Unit hour on the Basic tier, which is capped at 64 cores.
Depot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceRisingWave: Does it replace Flink?
For SQL-expressible transformations, often yes. For custom stateful processing and complex event handling, no.
RisingWave: Can I query it like Postgres?
Yes over the Postgres wire protocol, but it is an analytical streaming engine, not a transactional database.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Jenkins
- Depot vs Kubernetes
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Docker
- Depot vs ESLint
- Depot vs GitHub
- Depot vs Harness
- Depot vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Depot vs Keil MDK
- Depot vs Moonrepo
- Depot vs GitLab
- Depot vs Apache Flink
- Depot vs Materialize
- Depot vs Tinybird
- Depot vs Redpanda
- Depot vs Timeplus
- Depot vs Estuary
- Depot vs Instaclustr
- Depot vs Fivetran HVR
- Depot vs Trino
- Depot vs TiDB
- Depot vs Xata
- Depot vs ScyllaDB
- Depot vs Solace PubSub+
- Depot vs SQLite
- Depot vs StarRocks
- Depot vs SurrealDB
- Depot vs Teradata
- Depot vs Apache Kafka
- RisingWave vs WarpBuild
- RisingWave vs Blacksmith
- RisingWave vs Nixpacks
- RisingWave vs Buildkite
- RisingWave vs GitLab CI/CD
- RisingWave vs Namespace
- RisingWave vs Jenkins
- RisingWave vs Kubernetes
- RisingWave vs Earthly
- RisingWave vs Nx Cloud
- RisingWave vs Docker
- RisingWave vs ESLint
- RisingWave vs GitHub
- RisingWave vs Harness
- RisingWave vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- RisingWave vs Keil MDK
- RisingWave vs Moonrepo
- RisingWave vs GitLab
- RisingWave vs Apache Flink
- RisingWave vs Materialize
- RisingWave vs Tinybird
- RisingWave vs Redpanda
- RisingWave vs Timeplus
- RisingWave vs Estuary
- RisingWave vs Instaclustr
- RisingWave vs Fivetran HVR
- RisingWave vs Trino
- RisingWave vs TiDB
- RisingWave vs Xata
- RisingWave vs ScyllaDB
- RisingWave vs Solace PubSub+
- RisingWave vs SQLite
- RisingWave vs StarRocks
- RisingWave vs SurrealDB
- RisingWave vs Teradata
- RisingWave vs Apache Kafka
