Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs RisingWave

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

RisingWave
Databases
Streaming database that maintains incremental materialised views in SQL instead of Flink jobs
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Blacksmith is a GitHub Actions runner service.
- Free plans on both; paid from $0.004/mo and $0.227/mo.
- Only Blacksmith lists bare metal runners; only RisingWave lists SQL materialised views.
- Where Blacksmith falls short: per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and RisingWave actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | RisingWave |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, Self-hosted, Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Databases |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: pricing model for Blacksmith.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in RisingWave
- SQL materialised views
- Postgres wire compatibility
- Object storage state
- Source connectors
- Sink connectors
- Iceberg tables
- Watermarks and windowing
- User defined functions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot RisingWave
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot RisingWave
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot RisingWave
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot RisingWave
RisingWave
- A team with Kafka topics that needs continuously fresh aggregates for a dashboard without standing up a Flink clusternot Blacksmith
- A fraud or risk team maintaining rolling counters and joins across event streams expressed as SQL viewsnot Blacksmith
- A company doing Postgres CDC into a real-time denormalised view for search or servingnot Blacksmith
- An analytics group that wants streaming results landed directly into Apache Iceberg without a separate writer jobnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
RisingWave
- Anything that does not fit SQL, such as custom windowing, complex event processing or heavy stateful logic, still needs Flink, so RisingWave often adds a system rather than removing one
- The Apache 2.0 community edition excludes premium features behind a licence key, and which capabilities sit on which side of that line moves between releases, so a self-hosted plan can be invalidated by an upgrade
- Long-running materialised views accumulate state in object storage, and cost and recovery time grow with retention in ways that are hard to forecast before you are in production
- The Postgres compatibility is protocol level; it is not a transactional Postgres and using it as a general purpose database, with point updates or high write concurrency, goes badly
- It is a comparatively young venture-funded project competing with Flink, Materialize and warehouse-native streaming, and the ecosystem of connectors, operators and third-party expertise is much thinner
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
RisingWave
Free- Community EditionFree
- Apache 2.0 licence, self-hosted
- Core streaming engine and connectors
- Premium features excluded and require a licence key
- Cloud Basic$0.227/hour
- Billed per RisingWave Unit hour
- Hosted on AWS, GCP or Azure
- Capped at 64 cores
- Cloud ProOn request
- No core limit
- Bring your own cloud option
- Premium features included
- Self-managed EnterpriseOn request
- On premises or Kubernetes
- Premium features unlocked by licence
- Annual contract with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose RisingWave if
- You need sql materialised views.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Self-hosted, Web.
- You also want postgres wire compatibility.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or RisingWave better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and RisingWave at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or RisingWave?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and RisingWave at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or RisingWave run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. RisingWave runs on Linux, Self-hosted, Web.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what RisingWave is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that RisingWave cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. RisingWave covers SQL materialised views, Postgres wire compatibility, Object storage state, Source connectors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceRisingWave: Is RisingWave open source?
The community edition is Apache 2.0 and self-hostable, but a set of premium features requires a paid licence key.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceRisingWave: What does the cloud cost?
It starts at 0.227 US dollars per RisingWave Unit hour on the Basic tier, which is capped at 64 cores.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceRisingWave: Does it replace Flink?
For SQL-expressible transformations, often yes. For custom stateful processing and complex event handling, no.
RisingWave: Can I query it like Postgres?
Yes over the Postgres wire protocol, but it is an analytical streaming engine, not a transactional database.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Jenkins
- Blacksmith vs Kubernetes
- Blacksmith vs GitLab
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs LaunchDarkly
- Blacksmith vs Terraform
- Blacksmith vs GitHub
- Blacksmith vs GoLand
- Blacksmith vs Hookdeck
- Blacksmith vs Istio
- Blacksmith vs JFrog Artifactory
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Nixpacks
- Blacksmith vs Apache Flink
- Blacksmith vs Materialize
- Blacksmith vs Tinybird
- Blacksmith vs Redpanda
- Blacksmith vs Timeplus
- Blacksmith vs Estuary
- Blacksmith vs Instaclustr
- Blacksmith vs Fivetran HVR
- Blacksmith vs Trino
- Blacksmith vs TiDB
- Blacksmith vs Xata
- Blacksmith vs ScyllaDB
- Blacksmith vs Solace PubSub+
- Blacksmith vs SQLite
- Blacksmith vs StarRocks
- Blacksmith vs SurrealDB
- Blacksmith vs Teradata
- Blacksmith vs Apache Kafka
- RisingWave vs WarpBuild
- RisingWave vs Depot
- RisingWave vs Namespace
- RisingWave vs Jenkins
- RisingWave vs Kubernetes
- RisingWave vs GitLab
- RisingWave vs Earthly
- RisingWave vs Nx Cloud
- RisingWave vs OpsLevel
- RisingWave vs LaunchDarkly
- RisingWave vs Terraform
- RisingWave vs GitHub
- RisingWave vs GoLand
- RisingWave vs Hookdeck
- RisingWave vs Istio
- RisingWave vs JFrog Artifactory
- RisingWave vs Nix
- RisingWave vs Nixpacks
- RisingWave vs Apache Flink
- RisingWave vs Materialize
- RisingWave vs Tinybird
- RisingWave vs Redpanda
- RisingWave vs Timeplus
- RisingWave vs Estuary
- RisingWave vs Instaclustr
- RisingWave vs Fivetran HVR
- RisingWave vs Trino
- RisingWave vs TiDB
- RisingWave vs Xata
- RisingWave vs ScyllaDB
- RisingWave vs Solace PubSub+
- RisingWave vs SQLite
- RisingWave vs StarRocks
- RisingWave vs SurrealDB
- RisingWave vs Teradata
- RisingWave vs Apache Kafka
