Developer Tools · head to head
Deno vs Endor Labs
Deno
Developer Tools
A fast, open-source, fully Node-compatible JS runtime with TypeScript baked right in
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Endor Labs
Cybersecurity
Security and AI agent governance for code and supply chain
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Deno egress bandwidth overage costs $0.20/GB which can become expensive for high-traffic applications; Endor Labs pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Deno and Endor Labs actually diverge.
| Attribute | Deno | Endor Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Seat-based per contributing developer with volume discounts |
| Platforms | Web | Web, CLI, IDE |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Deno
Nothing recorded that Endor Labs does not also cover.
Only in Endor Labs
- AI coding agent governance
- SAST scanning
- Secrets detection
- Reachability analysis
- Open source dependency scanning
- Package firewall
- MCP server integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Deno
- Running TypeScript natively without transpilation overheadnot Endor Labs
- Migrating Node.js applications to secure-by-default runtimenot Endor Labs
- Deploying edge functions and serverless containers seamlesslynot Endor Labs
- Consolidating developer tools into single binarynot Endor Labs
Endor Labs
- Securing AI coding agent outputs before deploymentnot Deno
- Reducing SAST false positives with reachability analysisnot Deno
- Managing open source supply chain risknot Deno
- Enforcing security policies in CI/CD pipelinesnot Deno
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Deno
- Egress bandwidth overage costs $0.20/GB which can become expensive for high-traffic applications
- CPU time overage is $0.10/hour on Pro and Builder tiers, adding to costs for compute-intensive workloads
- Enterprise pricing is not disclosed; requires sales contact
Endor Labs
- Pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- Developer tier lacks UI and historical scan data
- Free tier limited to local scanning only
- Seat-based model may become expensive for large teams
Pricing, plan by plan
Deno
Free- FreeFree
- 1 million requests/month
- 20GB egress bandwidth
- 10 apps
- Pro$20/month
- 5 million requests/month
- 200GB egress
- 50 apps
- Builder$200/month
- 25 million requests/month
- 2,000GB egress
- 10,000 apps
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom limits on all metrics
- 99.95% reliability SLA
- Email support with SLA
Endor Labs
Free- DeveloperFree
- Local scanning
- Read-only vulnerability data
- No UI, policies, or scan history
Which should you pick?
Choose Endor Labs if
- You need ai coding agent governance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE.
- You also want sast scanning.
Questions people ask
- Is Deno or Endor Labs better?
- Neither clearly leads. Deno starts at Free and Endor Labs at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Deno or Endor Labs?
- Deno starts at Free and Endor Labs at Free.
- Does Deno or Endor Labs run on more platforms?
- Deno runs on Web. Endor Labs runs on Web, CLI, IDE.
- Can I use Deno for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Deno best used for?
- Deno is most often used for running typescript natively without transpilation overhead, migrating node.js applications to secure-by-default runtime, deploying edge functions and serverless containers seamlessly, consolidating developer tools into single binary. Of those, running typescript natively without transpilation overhead and migrating node.js applications to secure-by-default runtime are not what Endor Labs is typically brought in for.
- What can Deno do that Endor Labs cannot?
- Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance, SAST scanning, Secrets detection, Reachability analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Deno: How much does Deno Deploy cost?
Deno Deploy offers a free tier at $0/month, Pro at $20/month, and Builder at $200/month. Enterprise has custom pricing. All plans include base request and bandwidth limits, with overage charges for additional usage.
SourceEndor Labs: What is the difference between Endor Labs Developer and paid tiers?
Developer tier is free and provides local scanning via MCP server with read-only vulnerability access and no UI. Paid tiers (Core and Pro) add team features like policy enforcement, enterprise integrations, reporting, and scan history.
SourceDeno: What are Deno Deploy's overage charges?
Egress bandwidth overages cost $0.20 per GB. CPU time overages are $0.10 per hour on Pro and Builder tiers. Memory time and KV database operations also incur charges beyond included limits.
SourceEndor Labs: How does Endor Labs define seats for pricing?
Seats are calculated per contributing developer (those with commits in monitored repositories within the last 90 days). Volume discounts apply as team size grows.
SourceDeno: How many apps can I deploy on Deno's free plan?
The free tier includes 10 apps with up to 1 concurrent build. Pro tier supports 50 apps with 3 concurrent builds, and Builder supports 10,000 apps with 20 concurrent builds.
SourceEndor Labs: Does Endor Labs support on-premises deployment?
The platform is cloud-based SaaS by default. Enterprise customers should contact sales to discuss custom deployment options.
SourceDeno: How many team members can access Deno Deploy?
The free tier supports up to 3 team members. Pro supports 10 team members. Builder supports 25 team members. Enterprise has custom seat limits.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Deno vs Turborepo
- Deno vs ESLint
- Deno vs pnpm
- Deno vs Visual Studio Code
- Deno vs Jitsu
- Deno vs Argo CD
- Deno vs Git
- Deno vs Soketi
- Deno vs Bazel
- Deno vs Pants Build
- Deno vs Tilt
- Deno vs Dagger
- Deno vs RAD Studio
- Deno vs Refact
- Deno vs Restate
- Deno vs RubyMine
- Deno vs SonarQube
- Deno vs Snyk
- Deno vs Socket
- Deno vs Chainguard
- Deno vs Akeyless
- Deno vs Doppler
- Deno vs Arnica
- Deno vs Infisical
- Deno vs Veracode
- Deno vs Speakeasy
- Deno vs Tenable
- Deno vs HashiCorp Vault
- Deno vs Transcend
- Deno vs Windscribe
- Deno vs Yoti
- Deno vs authentik
- Deno vs Avast One
- Deno vs Cosign
- Endor Labs vs Turborepo
- Endor Labs vs ESLint
- Endor Labs vs pnpm
- Endor Labs vs Visual Studio Code
- Endor Labs vs Jitsu
- Endor Labs vs Argo CD
- Endor Labs vs Git
- Endor Labs vs Soketi
- Endor Labs vs Bazel
- Endor Labs vs Pants Build
- Endor Labs vs Tilt
- Endor Labs vs Dagger
- Endor Labs vs RAD Studio
- Endor Labs vs Refact
- Endor Labs vs Restate
- Endor Labs vs RubyMine
- Endor Labs vs SonarQube
- Endor Labs vs Snyk
- Endor Labs vs Socket
- Endor Labs vs Chainguard
- Endor Labs vs Akeyless
- Endor Labs vs Doppler
- Endor Labs vs Arnica
- Endor Labs vs Infisical
- Endor Labs vs Veracode
- Endor Labs vs Speakeasy
- Endor Labs vs Tenable
- Endor Labs vs HashiCorp Vault
- Endor Labs vs Transcend
- Endor Labs vs Windscribe
- Endor Labs vs Yoti
- Endor Labs vs authentik
- Endor Labs vs Avast One
- Endor Labs vs Cosign