Government · head to head
DemandStar vs Feedzai

DemandStar
Government
Bid distribution network that is free for government agencies and charges the suppliers instead
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Feedzai
Cybersecurity
Real-time transaction fraud and financial crime detection for banks and payment processors
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- DemandStar starts at $60/yr; Feedzai prices on request.
- Only DemandStar lists free for agencies; only Feedzai lists real-time scoring.
- Where DemandStar falls short: because agencies pay nothing, they have little leverage over the roadmap and features are driven by what makes supplier subscriptions sell.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DemandStar and Feedzai actually diverge.
| Attribute | DemandStar | Feedzai |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Free for agencies, per year by geographic coverage for suppliers | Quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DemandStar
- Free for agencies
- Commodity code matching
- eBidding
- Plan holder lists
- Supplier registration
- Geographic subscription tiers
Only in Feedzai
- Real-time scoring
- Rule and model hybrid
- Case manager
- Behavioural biometrics
- Model explainability
- Deployment options
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DemandStar
- A city purchasing officer who wants wider bid distribution without running a procurement to buy softwarenot Feedzai
- A contractor who works in three adjacent counties and wants notifications only for that footprintnot Feedzai
- An agency needing sealed electronic bid submission to replace paper deliveries to the clerknot Feedzai
- A supplier testing whether public sector work is viable before committing to a national subscriptionnot Feedzai
Feedzai
- A bank joining an instant payments scheme where transfers are irrevocable and post-hoc recovery is impossiblenot DemandStar
- A card issuer whose existing rules engine cannot be changed without a release, so fraud waves run for daysnot DemandStar
- An acquirer needing per-merchant risk models rather than one portfolio-wide modelnot DemandStar
- A bank required by its regulator to explain automated declines to customers, which rules out opaque scoringnot DemandStar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DemandStar
- Coverage is opt-in by agency, so a supplier paying for a state tier receives only participating agencies and must still monitor other portals for the rest
- The free supplier tier charges around 5 US dollars per bid document download, which turns an apparently free plan into a metered one as soon as you actually pursue opportunities
- State pricing ranges from roughly 100 to 1,499 US dollars with the variation driven by agency density, so suppliers cannot predict cost from geography alone
- Because agencies pay nothing, they have little leverage over the roadmap and features are driven by what makes supplier subscriptions sell
- The brand is being folded into Euna OpenBid following the Euna Solutions consolidation, so suppliers and agencies should expect the name and portal to change
Feedzai
- Pricing is per transaction with an annual minimum, so a bank with seasonal or growing volume commits to a floor it may not use and pays overage above the band
- It sits in the authorisation path, which makes every upgrade a change-controlled event with rollback plans, and the operational burden falls on the bank rather than the vendor
- Out of the box models need months of the customer own labelled fraud history before they beat the rules they replace, so the value case starts late
- AML and fraud are licensed as separate modules, so institutions expecting one platform fee find the transaction monitoring capability is a second line item
- The buyer profile is large institutions, so smaller banks and fintechs face minimums that make per-transaction economics unattractive below significant scale
Pricing, plan by plan
DemandStar
Free- Government agencyFree
- Post unlimited solicitations
- Access the supplier network
- eBidding and plan holder lists
- Supplier freeFree
- Bid notifications for one agency of your choice
- Bid document downloads charged around 5 USD each
- Supplier profile and registration
- Supplier county$60/yr
- All participating agencies within one county
- Unlimited bid document access for that county
- Approximate rate, varies by county
- Supplier state$100/yr
- All participating agencies within one state
- Priced from around 100 to 1,499 USD depending on agency density
Feedzai
On request- Feedzai Financial Crime PlatformOn request
- Priced by transaction volume with annual minimum commitment
- Modules for fraud, AML and account opening licensed separately
- Cloud, private cloud and on-premises deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose DemandStar if
- You need free for agencies.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want commodity code matching.
Choose Feedzai if
- You need real-time scoring.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want rule and model hybrid.
Questions people ask
- Is DemandStar or Feedzai better?
- Neither clearly leads. DemandStar starts at Free and Feedzai at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DemandStar or Feedzai?
- DemandStar has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for DemandStar and On request for Feedzai.
- Does DemandStar or Feedzai run on more platforms?
- DemandStar runs on Web. Feedzai runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use DemandStar for free?
- Yes. DemandStar has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Feedzai starts at On request.
- What is DemandStar best used for?
- DemandStar is most often used for a city purchasing officer who wants wider bid distribution without running a procurement to buy software, a contractor who works in three adjacent counties and wants notifications only for that footprint, an agency needing sealed electronic bid submission to replace paper deliveries to the clerk, a supplier testing whether public sector work is viable before committing to a national subscription. Of those, a city purchasing officer who wants wider bid distribution without running a procurement to buy software and a contractor who works in three adjacent counties and wants notifications only for that footprint are not what Feedzai is typically brought in for.
- What can DemandStar do that Feedzai cannot?
- DemandStar covers Free for agencies, Commodity code matching, eBidding, Plan holder lists. Feedzai covers Real-time scoring, Rule and model hybrid, Case manager, Behavioural biometrics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DemandStar: Is DemandStar free for governments?
Yes, entirely. Agencies post solicitations and access the supplier network at no cost; suppliers fund the platform.
Feedzai: Can Feedzai run on-premises?
Yes. On-premises and private cloud deployments are supported, which is why it appears in markets where transaction data cannot legally leave the country.
DemandStar: What do suppliers pay?
Free for one agency with roughly 5 USD per document download, about 60 USD a year per county, 100 to 1,499 per state, and 2,699 for national coverage.
Feedzai: Does it cover AML as well as fraud?
It does, but transaction monitoring is a separately licensed module. Assume two line items if you want both.
DemandStar: Who owns DemandStar?
Euna Solutions, the public sector portfolio formerly known as GTY Technology, which also absorbed Bonfire and Ion Wave.
Feedzai: How fast are decisions?
Designed for the authorisation window, typically tens of milliseconds. This is the constraint that rules out batch scoring architectures.
DemandStar: Does it cover every agency?
No. Only agencies that have opted in, which is the main limitation for suppliers buying wide coverage.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DemandStar vs Tyler Technologies
- DemandStar vs Accela
- DemandStar vs OpenGov
- DemandStar vs Bidnet Direct
- DemandStar vs Periscope Holdings
- DemandStar vs VUEWorks
- DemandStar vs ArchiveSocial
- DemandStar vs RecDesk
- DemandStar vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- DemandStar vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- DemandStar vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- DemandStar vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- DemandStar vs Citizen
- DemandStar vs CKAN
- DemandStar vs Clariti
- DemandStar vs DataSF
- DemandStar vs Google Cloud for Government
- DemandStar vs GovPilot
- DemandStar vs Unit21
- DemandStar vs ThetaRay
- DemandStar vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- DemandStar vs NICE Actimize
- DemandStar vs Quantexa
- DemandStar vs Sardine
- DemandStar vs Silent Eight
- DemandStar vs Transmit Security
- DemandStar vs Fenergo
- DemandStar vs Socure
- DemandStar vs Sumsub
- DemandStar vs iDenfy
- DemandStar vs Arnica
- DemandStar vs Authelia
- DemandStar vs Authy
- DemandStar vs Baffle
- DemandStar vs Beyond Identity
- DemandStar vs BeyondTrust
- Feedzai vs Tyler Technologies
- Feedzai vs Accela
- Feedzai vs OpenGov
- Feedzai vs Bidnet Direct
- Feedzai vs Periscope Holdings
- Feedzai vs VUEWorks
- Feedzai vs ArchiveSocial
- Feedzai vs RecDesk
- Feedzai vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Feedzai vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Feedzai vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Feedzai vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Feedzai vs Citizen
- Feedzai vs CKAN
- Feedzai vs Clariti
- Feedzai vs DataSF
- Feedzai vs Google Cloud for Government
- Feedzai vs GovPilot
- Feedzai vs Unit21
- Feedzai vs ThetaRay
- Feedzai vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Feedzai vs NICE Actimize
- Feedzai vs Quantexa
- Feedzai vs Sardine
- Feedzai vs Silent Eight
- Feedzai vs Transmit Security
- Feedzai vs Fenergo
- Feedzai vs Socure
- Feedzai vs Sumsub
- Feedzai vs iDenfy
- Feedzai vs Arnica
- Feedzai vs Authelia
- Feedzai vs Authy
- Feedzai vs Baffle
- Feedzai vs Beyond Identity
- Feedzai vs BeyondTrust
