Softwr

Cloud · head to head

Serverless Framework vs Zipkin

Serverless Framework logo

Serverless Framework

Cloud

Build and deploy serverless applications on AWS Lambda

From
Free
Rated
-
Zipkin logo

Zipkin

Cloud

Distributed tracing system for microservice latency

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Serverless Framework exclusive to AWS Lambda - no support for other cloud providers; Zipkin less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
  • They diverge on capability: Serverless Framework covers YAML configuration, Zipkin covers Trace collection and search.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Serverless Framework and Zipkin actually diverge.

Attributes where Serverless Framework and Zipkin differ
AttributeServerless FrameworkZipkin
Pricing modelUnknownOpen source, no licence fee
PlatformsAWS Lambda, AWS API Gateway, AWS CloudFormationLinux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Serverless Framework

  • YAML configuration
  • Single command deployment
  • Extensible plugin ecosystem
  • Multi-language support
  • Unified dashboard
  • Built-in metrics and alerts

Only in Zipkin

  • Trace collection and search
  • Dependency diagram
  • Simple deployment
  • Pluggable storage

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Serverless Framework

  • Deploying APIs and microservices to AWS Lambdanot Zipkin
  • Building event-driven applications with serverless functionsnot Zipkin
  • Managing multi-language serverless projectsnot Zipkin

Zipkin

  • Adding distributed tracing quickly without standing up heavy infrastructurenot Serverless Framework
  • Java and Spring Boot estates, where instrumentation support is long-establishednot Serverless Framework
  • Small deployments where Jaeger is more than the problem requiresnot Serverless Framework

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Serverless Framework

  • Exclusive to AWS Lambda - no support for other cloud providers
  • Paid tier requires credit system that can be confusing for budgeting
  • Plugin ecosystem quality varies significantly

Zipkin

  • Less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
  • Fewer features: sampling, storage options and UI are all more limited
  • The interface is dated and slower to work with on large trace volumes
  • Tracing alone still leaves metrics and logs in separate tools during an incident

Pricing, plan by plan

Serverless Framework

Free
  • FreeFree
    • For organizations with under $2M annual revenue
    • All Framework features included
  • Pay-As-You-Go$4/credit
    • 1 credit = 1 Service Instance or 50K Traces or 4M Metrics
    • Standard rate for larger organizations
  • Reserved Credits$1/credit
    • Discounts up to 74% off (1-year), 77% off (2-year), 80% off (3-year)
    • Additional 10% off for upfront payment

Zipkin

Free
  • ZipkinFree
    • Full functionality
    • No usage limits
    • Community support

Which should you pick?

Choose Serverless Framework if

  • You need yaml configuration.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on AWS Lambda, AWS API Gateway, AWS CloudFormation.
  • You also want single command deployment.

Choose Zipkin if

  • You need trace collection and search.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
  • You also want dependency diagram.

Questions people ask

Is Serverless Framework or Zipkin better?
Neither clearly leads. Serverless Framework starts at Free and Zipkin at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Serverless Framework or Zipkin?
Serverless Framework starts at Free and Zipkin at Free.
Does Serverless Framework or Zipkin run on more platforms?
Serverless Framework runs on AWS Lambda, AWS API Gateway, AWS CloudFormation. Zipkin runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
Can I use Serverless Framework for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Serverless Framework best used for?
Serverless Framework is most often used for deploying apis and microservices to aws lambda, building event-driven applications with serverless functions, managing multi-language serverless projects. Of those, deploying apis and microservices to aws lambda and building event-driven applications with serverless functions are not what Zipkin is typically brought in for.
What can Serverless Framework do that Zipkin cannot?
Serverless Framework covers YAML configuration, Single command deployment, Extensible plugin ecosystem, Multi-language support. Zipkin covers Trace collection and search, Dependency diagram, Simple deployment, Pluggable storage.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Serverless Framework: When do I have to pay for Serverless Framework?

The Serverless Framework CLI v4+ is free for organizations earning under $2 million annually. Organizations earning more must purchase credits at $4 per credit standard rate or reserved credits starting at $1 per credit with volume discounts.

Source
Zipkin: Is Zipkin free?

Yes, open source with no licence fee.

Serverless Framework: What cloud providers does Serverless Framework support?

Serverless Framework is exclusive to AWS Lambda. It does not support other cloud providers like Azure or Google Cloud.

Source
Zipkin: Zipkin or Jaeger?

Jaeger has more momentum, more features and CNCF backing. Zipkin is lighter and quicker to stand up, and remains well supported in the Java and Spring ecosystem.

Serverless Framework: What does one credit cover?

One credit equals 1 Service Instance, 50,000 Traces, or 4 Million Metrics.

Source
Zipkin: Does Zipkin work with OpenTelemetry?

Yes. OpenTelemetry can export to Zipkin, which is now the usual way to instrument for it.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads