Softwr

Software · head to head

DeepInfra vs Heroku

DeepInfra logo

DeepInfra

Software

Low-cost cloud API for running open-source AI models

From
$0.08/month
Rated
-
Heroku logo

Heroku

Software

Cloud Application Platform

From
$7/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: DeepInfra focuses on inference hosting rather than fine-tuning or full training pipelines that competitors like Fireworks AI offer.; Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
  • They diverge on capability: DeepInfra covers Open model hosting, Heroku covers Git-based deployment.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which DeepInfra and Heroku actually diverge.

Attributes where DeepInfra and Heroku differ
AttributeDeepInfraHeroku
Starting price$0.08/month$7/month
Pricing modelusage-basedsubscription
Platformsweb, apiWeb, Api, Workers
FoundedUnknown2007

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in DeepInfra

  • Open model hosting
  • Pay-per-token pricing
  • Long context support
  • DeepCluster
  • Zero retention policy
  • Real-time metrics

Only in Heroku

  • Git-based deployment
  • Buildpacks
  • Dynos (containers)
  • Add-ons marketplace
  • Postgres database
  • Environment variables
  • Logging
  • API

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

DeepInfra

  • Running open-source LLM inference without managing GPUsnot Heroku
  • Serving speech and image generation models via APInot Heroku
  • Cost-sensitive production inference at scalenot Heroku
  • Reserved GPU capacity via DeepCluster for steady workloadsnot Heroku

Heroku

  • Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot DeepInfra
  • Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot DeepInfra
  • Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot DeepInfra

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

DeepInfra

  • Focuses on inference hosting rather than fine-tuning or full training pipelines that competitors like Fireworks AI offer.
  • Model selection is limited to what DeepInfra chooses to host, unlike self-managed platforms.
  • No published free tier; usage is billed from the first token.

Heroku

  • There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
  • Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
  • Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
  • Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
  • Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
  • Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill

Pricing, plan by plan

DeepInfra

$0.08/month
  • Pay-as-you-go$undefined/mo
    • Per-model token pricing from $0.08 to $2.85 per million input tokens
    • No long-term contract
  • DeepCluster$1.98/month
    • Dedicated NVIDIA B300 GPU clusters at $1.98/GPU-hour

Heroku

$7/month
  • Hobby$7/month
    • 512MB RAM
    • Shared CPU
    • 1 web dyno
  • Standard$50/month
    • 512MB RAM
    • Dedicated CPU
    • Automatic scaling

Which should you pick?

Choose DeepInfra if

  • You need open model hosting.
  • You work on web, api.
  • You also want pay-per-token pricing.

Choose Heroku if

  • You need git-based deployment.
  • You work on Web, Api, Workers.
  • You also want buildpacks.

Questions people ask

Is DeepInfra or Heroku better?
Neither clearly leads. DeepInfra starts at $0.08/month and Heroku at $7/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, DeepInfra or Heroku?
DeepInfra starts at $0.08/month and Heroku at $7/month.
Does DeepInfra or Heroku run on more platforms?
DeepInfra runs on web, api. Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers.
What is DeepInfra best used for?
DeepInfra is most often used for running open-source llm inference without managing gpus, serving speech and image generation models via api, cost-sensitive production inference at scale, reserved gpu capacity via deepcluster for steady workloads. Of those, running open-source llm inference without managing gpus and serving speech and image generation models via api are not what Heroku is typically brought in for.
What can DeepInfra do that Heroku cannot?
DeepInfra covers Open model hosting, Pay-per-token pricing, Long context support, DeepCluster. Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

DeepInfra: Is there a free tier on DeepInfra?

No free tier is published; usage is billed pay-as-you-go from the first token, though a credit card or pre-payment is required before you can send requests.

Source
DeepInfra: How is usage priced?

Language models are billed per million input/output tokens, other models by inference execution time, and audio models per minute of audio processed, with no minimum commitment.

Source
DeepInfra: What are the Standard, Priority, and Flex tiers?

Standard is default best-effort pricing at 1x, Priority costs 1.5x for faster time-to-first-token during peak demand, and Flex costs 0.8x for non-production or asynchronous workloads.

Source
DeepInfra: How does billing scale with spend?

Accounts advance through usage tiers as cumulative payments cross $20, $100, $500, $2,000, and $10,000 thresholds, with invoices generated monthly or at each threshold.

Source
DeepInfra: Is there a limit on concurrent requests?

Yes, accounts are limited to 200 concurrent requests by default, though spending limits can also be configured to prevent unexpected charges.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads