Software · head to head
deck.gl vs MapQuest

deck.gl
Software
WebGL-powered framework for visual exploratory data analysis of large datasets, developed by
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
MapQuest
Software
Free driving directions, live traffic updates, and road conditions for trip planning and navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: deck.gl deck.gl is a code library with no vendor-sold plan, no marketplace or app store listing, and no SLA; buyers get community GitHub support only, not a purchasable enterprise tier.; MapQuest subscription tiers cost more per transaction than the pay as you go rate at low volume, since $119 a month for 30,000 transactions is roughly $0.004 each against $0.0045 on demand
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which deck.gl and MapQuest actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (freemium), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in deck.gl
Nothing recorded that MapQuest does not also cover.
Only in MapQuest
Nothing recorded that deck.gl does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
deck.gl
- GPU-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browsernot MapQuest
- Composing map overlays from reusable layersnot MapQuest
- Adding data layers on top of Google Maps or Mapbox basemapsnot MapQuest
- High-precision plotting using 64-bit GPU computationnot MapQuest
- Use from React or plain JavaScriptnot MapQuest
MapQuest
- Geocoding, routing and static maps over an APInot deck.gl
- Adding directions and place search to an applicationnot deck.gl
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
deck.gl
- deck.gl is a code library with no vendor-sold plan, no marketplace or app store listing, and no SLA; buyers get community GitHub support only, not a purchasable enterprise tier.
MapQuest
- Subscription tiers cost more per transaction than the pay as you go rate at low volume, since $119 a month for 30,000 transactions is roughly $0.004 each against $0.0045 on demand
- The 50,000 free pay as you go transactions are described as available for a limited time rather than as a standing allowance
- Plan allowances are monthly and do not carry over
- Enterprise volume is custom priced
Pricing, plan by plan
deck.gl
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the deck.gl review.
MapQuest
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the MapQuest review.
Which should you pick?
Choose deck.gl if
Nothing in the data separates deck.gl from MapQuest on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose MapQuest if
Nothing in the data separates MapQuest from deck.gl on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is deck.gl or MapQuest better?
- Neither clearly leads. deck.gl starts at On request and MapQuest at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, deck.gl or MapQuest?
- deck.gl starts at On request and MapQuest at On request.
- Does deck.gl or MapQuest run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is deck.gl best used for?
- deck.gl is most often used for gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser, composing map overlays from reusable layers, adding data layers on top of google maps or mapbox basemaps, high-precision plotting using 64-bit gpu computation. Of those, gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser and composing map overlays from reusable layers are not what MapQuest is typically brought in for.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- deck.gl vs Mapbox
- deck.gl vs Google Maps Platform
- deck.gl vs HERE Technologies
- deck.gl vs Apple Maps
- deck.gl vs Leaflet
- deck.gl vs Esri ArcGIS
- deck.gl vs CesiumJS
- deck.gl vs Samsara
- deck.gl vs Bing Maps
- deck.gl vs CARTO
- deck.gl vs Geotab
- deck.gl vs GraphHopper
- deck.gl vs HERE WeGo
- deck.gl vs IndoorAtlas
- deck.gl vs Mappedin
- deck.gl vs Verizon Connect
- deck.gl vs AllTrails
- deck.gl vs Citymapper
- MapQuest vs Mapbox
- MapQuest vs Google Maps Platform
- MapQuest vs HERE Technologies
- MapQuest vs Apple Maps
- MapQuest vs Leaflet
- MapQuest vs Esri ArcGIS
- MapQuest vs CesiumJS
- MapQuest vs Samsara
- MapQuest vs Bing Maps
- MapQuest vs CARTO
- MapQuest vs Geotab
- MapQuest vs GraphHopper
- MapQuest vs HERE WeGo
- MapQuest vs IndoorAtlas
- MapQuest vs Mappedin
- MapQuest vs Verizon Connect
- MapQuest vs AllTrails
- MapQuest vs Citymapper
