Developer Tools · head to head
Dagger vs Passbolt

Dagger
Developer Tools
Programmable CI/CD engine that runs your pipeline as containers on any runner
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Passbolt
Cybersecurity
Open-source password manager for teams with self-hosted or cloud deployment
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dagger dagger is not a CI provider, so you keep paying for GitHub Actions or GitLab runners underneath it; the Dagger Cloud subscription is an addition to your CI bill, not a replacement for it.; Passbolt pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- They diverge on capability: Dagger covers Pipelines as code, Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dagger and Passbolt actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dagger
- Pipelines as code
- Local and CI parity
- Content-addressed caching
- Dagger Functions and modules
- CI-provider agnostic
- Dagger Cloud traces
- GitHub Checks integration
- Container-native execution
Only in Passbolt
- Password sharing and folders
- Groups and role-based access
- Browser extensions and CLI
- Open API
- LDAP provisioning and SSO
- Activity audit log
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dagger
- A platform team maintaining near-identical build YAML across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls insteadnot Passbolt
- An engineering organisation migrating off a CI provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migrationnot Passbolt
- A team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug CI-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locallynot Passbolt
- A monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materiallynot Passbolt
Passbolt
- Self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereigntynot Dagger
- Provisioning vault access from an existing LDAP/AD directorynot Dagger
- Sharing credentials across engineering or IT teams via folders and groupsnot Dagger
- Automating credential retrieval through the CLI or open APInot Dagger
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dagger
- Dagger is not a CI provider, so you keep paying for GitHub Actions or GitLab runners underneath it; the Dagger Cloud subscription is an addition to your CI bill, not a replacement for it.
- Writing pipelines in Go or TypeScript raises the barrier to entry: a release engineer who could edit a YAML step now needs to read code, and the people who can fix a broken build shrink to those comfortable with the SDK.
- The engine runs as a container on the runner and needs a persistent cache volume to deliver its main benefit, so ephemeral CI runners give you correctness without the speed, and provisioning durable cache storage is extra platform work.
- The Team plan caps at ten users and ten million events per month; an organisation of any size crosses that quickly and moves to Enterprise pricing that is not published, so cost at scale is unknowable up front.
- The module ecosystem is young and thinly maintained relative to the marketplace of a mature CI provider, so integrations that exist as a one-line Action often have to be written yourself as a Dagger function.
Passbolt
- Pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- Community Edition lacks SSO and LDAP provisioning, which many organizations need for onboarding at scale.
- Self-hosting the Community Edition requires infrastructure and maintenance effort compared to fully managed competitors.
- Enterprise-tier support and HA consulting require custom, quote-based pricing rather than transparent rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
Dagger
Free- IndividualFree
- One user
- One million events per month
- Workflow logs and function call traces
- Team$50/month
- Up to ten users
- Ten million events per month
- Module insights and module catalogue
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom user and event limits
- SSO
- Managed single-tenant deployment
Passbolt
Free- Community EditionFree
- Unlimited users
- Password sharing and folders
- Role-based access control
- Pro Edition$4.9/month
- Minimum 10 users, billed annually
- LDAP/AD provisioning
- Single sign-on
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/month
- High availability and disaster recovery consulting
- White-glove migration
- Custom feature development
Which should you pick?
Choose Dagger if
- You need pipelines as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want local and ci parity.
Choose Passbolt if
- You need password sharing and folders.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want groups and role-based access.
Questions people ask
- Is Dagger or Passbolt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dagger starts at Free and Passbolt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dagger or Passbolt?
- Dagger starts at Free and Passbolt at Free.
- Does Dagger or Passbolt run on more platforms?
- Dagger runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted. Passbolt runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- Can I use Dagger for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dagger best used for?
- Dagger is most often used for a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead, an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration, a team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug ci-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locally, a monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materially. Of those, a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead and an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration are not what Passbolt is typically brought in for.
- What can Dagger do that Passbolt cannot?
- Dagger covers Pipelines as code, Local and CI parity, Content-addressed caching, Dagger Functions and modules. Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Groups and role-based access, Browser extensions and CLI, Open API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dagger: Does Dagger replace GitHub Actions?
No. Dagger runs inside GitHub Actions or any other CI. It replaces the YAML that describes your pipeline steps, not the trigger and runner layer.
Passbolt: Is Passbolt free to use?
Yes. The Community Edition is free forever with unlimited users, including password sharing, folders, groups, role-based access, browser extensions, a CLI, and an open API.
SourceDagger: Is the engine open source?
Yes, the Dagger engine and SDKs are open source and free. Dagger Cloud, the observability product, is what costs money.
Passbolt: What does the Pro Edition cost and add?
Pro Edition costs $4.90 per user per month billed annually, with a 10-user minimum, and adds LDAP/AD provisioning, single sign-on, account recovery escrow, activity audit logs, and next-business-day support.
SourceDagger: What is an event in the pricing?
Dagger Cloud meters pipeline telemetry events. One million per month is free; the Team plan at 50 USD per month allows ten million.
Passbolt: What license is Passbolt distributed under?
All Passbolt editions, including Pro and Enterprise, are distributed under the AGPL v3 open-source license.
SourceDagger: Can I run the same pipeline on my laptop?
Yes, that is the main reason teams adopt it. The dagger CLI executes the identical graph locally, so CI-only failures become reproducible.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dagger vs Earthly
- Dagger vs Buildkite
- Dagger vs Tilt
- Dagger vs Nixpacks
- Dagger vs Depot
- Dagger vs Blacksmith
- Dagger vs WarpBuild
- Dagger vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Dagger vs Nx Cloud
- Dagger vs Namespace
- Dagger vs Pants Build
- Dagger vs Jitsu
- Dagger vs GoLand
- Dagger vs Hookdeck
- Dagger vs JFrog Artifactory
- Dagger vs Nix
- Dagger vs Bitwarden
- Dagger vs LastPass
- Dagger vs authentik
- Dagger vs 1Password
- Dagger vs Authelia
- Dagger vs Enpass
- Dagger vs HashiCorp Vault
- Dagger vs Infisical
- Dagger vs Norton 360
- Dagger vs Semgrep
- Dagger vs Trivy
- Dagger vs Chainguard
- Dagger vs Trulioo
- Dagger vs Unit21
- Dagger vs Veracode
- Dagger vs Very Good Security
- Dagger vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Dagger vs Windscribe
- Passbolt vs Earthly
- Passbolt vs Buildkite
- Passbolt vs Tilt
- Passbolt vs Nixpacks
- Passbolt vs Depot
- Passbolt vs Blacksmith
- Passbolt vs WarpBuild
- Passbolt vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Passbolt vs Nx Cloud
- Passbolt vs Namespace
- Passbolt vs Pants Build
- Passbolt vs Jitsu
- Passbolt vs GoLand
- Passbolt vs Hookdeck
- Passbolt vs JFrog Artifactory
- Passbolt vs Nix
- Passbolt vs Bitwarden
- Passbolt vs LastPass
- Passbolt vs authentik
- Passbolt vs 1Password
- Passbolt vs Authelia
- Passbolt vs Enpass
- Passbolt vs HashiCorp Vault
- Passbolt vs Infisical
- Passbolt vs Norton 360
- Passbolt vs Semgrep
- Passbolt vs Trivy
- Passbolt vs Chainguard
- Passbolt vs Trulioo
- Passbolt vs Unit21
- Passbolt vs Veracode
- Passbolt vs Very Good Security
- Passbolt vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Passbolt vs Windscribe
