Developer Tools · head to head
Dagger vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station

Dagger
Developer Tools
Programmable CI/CD engine that runs your pipeline as containers on any runner
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
Cybersecurity
Camera-vendor video management software with a free 32-channel tier for VIVOTEK devices
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Dagger has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Dagger dagger is not a CI provider, so you keep paying for GitHub Actions or GitLab runners underneath it; the Dagger Cloud subscription is an addition to your CI bill, not a replacement for it.; VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vAST 2 has entered end of maintenance with technical support and software files withdrawn, yet distributors still list VAST 2 licences, so a buyer can be quoted unsupported software without realising it.
- They diverge on capability: Dagger covers Pipelines as code, VIVOTEK VAST Security Station covers VSS Lite free tier.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dagger and VIVOTEK VAST Security Station actually diverge.
| Attribute | Dagger | VIVOTEK VAST Security Station |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month per team for Dagger Cloud | One-time purchase per camera channel |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted | Windows, Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dagger
- Pipelines as code
- Local and CI parity
- Content-addressed caching
- Dagger Functions and modules
- CI-provider agnostic
- Dagger Cloud traces
- GitHub Checks integration
- Container-native execution
Only in VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- VSS Lite free tier
- Per-channel licensing
- Third-party camera support
- Failover and TV matrix
- Vision object analytics
- Embedded NVR licensing
- NDAA and TAA compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dagger
- A platform team maintaining near-identical build YAML across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls insteadnot VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- An engineering organisation migrating off a CI provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migrationnot VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- A team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug CI-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locallynot VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- A monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materiallynot VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- A school or small public building with fewer than 32 VIVOTEK cameras that needs a VMS at no licence costnot Dagger
- A United States public sector site that must meet NDAA and TAA procurement restrictionsnot Dagger
- An existing VAST 2 site that needs to migrate before the software falls further out of maintenancenot Dagger
- A mid-sized site standardising on VIVOTEK hardware with a handful of third-party cameras to absorbnot Dagger
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dagger
- Dagger is not a CI provider, so you keep paying for GitHub Actions or GitLab runners underneath it; the Dagger Cloud subscription is an addition to your CI bill, not a replacement for it.
- Writing pipelines in Go or TypeScript raises the barrier to entry: a release engineer who could edit a YAML step now needs to read code, and the people who can fix a broken build shrink to those comfortable with the SDK.
- The engine runs as a container on the runner and needs a persistent cache volume to deliver its main benefit, so ephemeral CI runners give you correctness without the speed, and provisioning durable cache storage is extra platform work.
- The Team plan caps at ten users and ten million events per month; an organisation of any size crosses that quickly and moves to Enterprise pricing that is not published, so cost at scale is unknowable up front.
- The module ecosystem is young and thinly maintained relative to the marketplace of a mature CI provider, so integrations that exist as a one-line Action often have to be written yourself as a Dagger function.
VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- VAST 2 has entered end of maintenance with technical support and software files withdrawn, yet distributors still list VAST 2 licences, so a buyer can be quoted unsupported software without realising it.
- The free Lite tier is hard capped at 32 cameras and VIVOTEK devices only, so a site that grows to 33 cameras or adds one third-party camera moves straight to paid Standard licensing.
- VSS Professional includes no camera licences at all, so the edition that large deployments need starts from a higher effective price than the tier comparison suggests.
- It is a camera manufacturer's VMS, so the third-party device list, analytics ecosystem and integration catalogue are all narrower than an independent platform like Milestone or Salient.
- No pricing is published for Standard or Professional channels; everything runs through distribution, which makes budgeting a phased expansion difficult without repeated quotes.
Pricing, plan by plan
Dagger
Free- IndividualFree
- One user
- One million events per month
- Workflow logs and function call traces
- Team$50/month
- Up to ten users
- Ten million events per month
- Module insights and module catalogue
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom user and event limits
- SSO
- Managed single-tenant deployment
VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
On request- VSS LiteFree
- Free of charge
- Up to 32 VIVOTEK cameras per server
- No third-party camera support
- VSS Standard$undefined/one-time
- Up to 256 cameras per server
- Eight camera licences included for VIVOTEK or third-party devices
- Additional channel licences purchased individually
- VSS Professional$undefined/one-time
- Large scale deployments with failover and TV matrix
- No camera licences included at all
- Every channel purchased or upgraded from Standard
Which should you pick?
Choose Dagger if
- You need pipelines as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want local and ci parity.
Choose VIVOTEK VAST Security Station if
- You need vss lite free tier.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want per-channel licensing.
Questions people ask
- Is Dagger or VIVOTEK VAST Security Station better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dagger starts at Free and VIVOTEK VAST Security Station at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dagger or VIVOTEK VAST Security Station?
- Dagger has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Dagger and On request for VIVOTEK VAST Security Station.
- Does Dagger or VIVOTEK VAST Security Station run on more platforms?
- Dagger runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted. VIVOTEK VAST Security Station runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Dagger for free?
- Yes. Dagger has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. VIVOTEK VAST Security Station starts at On request.
- What is Dagger best used for?
- Dagger is most often used for a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead, an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration, a team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug ci-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locally, a monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materially. Of those, a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead and an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration are not what VIVOTEK VAST Security Station is typically brought in for.
- What can Dagger do that VIVOTEK VAST Security Station cannot?
- Dagger covers Pipelines as code, Local and CI parity, Content-addressed caching, Dagger Functions and modules. VIVOTEK VAST Security Station covers VSS Lite free tier, Per-channel licensing, Third-party camera support, Failover and TV matrix.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dagger: Does Dagger replace GitHub Actions?
No. Dagger runs inside GitHub Actions or any other CI. It replaces the YAML that describes your pipeline steps, not the trigger and runner layer.
VIVOTEK VAST Security Station: Should I still buy VAST 2?
No. VAST 2 has entered end of maintenance with support and software files withdrawn. VSS is the current product, and any VAST 2 licence still on a distributor price list should be questioned.
Dagger: Is the engine open source?
Yes, the Dagger engine and SDKs are open source and free. Dagger Cloud, the observability product, is what costs money.
VIVOTEK VAST Security Station: Is VSS Lite really free?
Yes, for up to 32 VIVOTEK cameras per server. It does not support third-party cameras and cannot exceed 32 channels.
Dagger: What is an event in the pricing?
Dagger Cloud meters pipeline telemetry events. One million per month is free; the Team plan at 50 USD per month allows ten million.
VIVOTEK VAST Security Station: How many licences come with Standard?
Eight camera licences, usable for VIVOTEK or third-party devices. Professional includes none.
Dagger: Can I run the same pipeline on my laptop?
Yes, that is the main reason teams adopt it. The dagger CLI executes the identical graph locally, so CI-only failures become reproducible.
VIVOTEK VAST Security Station: Is VIVOTEK NDAA compliant?
VIVOTEK publishes an NDAA and TAA compliant product list, which is why it appears in United States public sector specifications where Section 889 excludes several other manufacturers.
Related pages
More on VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
Other head to heads
- Dagger vs Earthly
- Dagger vs Buildkite
- Dagger vs Tilt
- Dagger vs Nixpacks
- Dagger vs Depot
- Dagger vs Blacksmith
- Dagger vs WarpBuild
- Dagger vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Dagger vs Nx Cloud
- Dagger vs Namespace
- Dagger vs Pants Build
- Dagger vs Jitsu
- Dagger vs GoLand
- Dagger vs Hookdeck
- Dagger vs JFrog Artifactory
- Dagger vs Nix
- Dagger vs Milestone XProtect
- Dagger vs Salient CompleteView
- Dagger vs Rhombus Systems
- Dagger vs Genetec Security Center
- Dagger vs Hanwha Vision
- Dagger vs March Networks
- Dagger vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Dagger vs Dahua Technology
- Dagger vs Camio
- Dagger vs Envysion
- Dagger vs Spot AI
- Dagger vs DTiQ
- Dagger vs Infisical
- Dagger vs JumpCloud
- Dagger vs McAfee Total Protection
- Dagger vs NICE Actimize
- Dagger vs Semgrep
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Earthly
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Buildkite
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Tilt
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Nixpacks
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Depot
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Blacksmith
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs WarpBuild
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Nx Cloud
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Namespace
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Pants Build
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Jitsu
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs GoLand
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Hookdeck
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs JFrog Artifactory
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Nix
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Milestone XProtect
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Salient CompleteView
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Rhombus Systems
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Genetec Security Center
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Hanwha Vision
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs March Networks
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Eagle Eye Networks
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Dahua Technology
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Camio
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Envysion
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Spot AI
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs DTiQ
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Infisical
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs JumpCloud
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs McAfee Total Protection
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs NICE Actimize
- VIVOTEK VAST Security Station vs Semgrep
