Softwr

Testing · head to head

Cypress vs Qase

Cypress logo

Cypress

Testing

JavaScript end-to-end testing framework with browser-based runner and cloud service

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Qase logo

Qase

Testing

Test case management with an API first design and a free tier for small teams

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Cypress limited to web applications; mobile and desktop app testing not supported; Qase requirements traceability is shallower than the enterprise incumbents, so proving coverage against a numbered specification takes manual field discipline rather than a built in link.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Cypress and Qase actually diverge.

Attributes where Cypress and Qase differ
AttributeCypressQase
Pricing modelfreemiumPer user per month
PlatformsmacOS, Windows, LinuxWeb

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Testing).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Cypress

Nothing recorded that Qase does not also cover.

Only in Qase

  • Case repository
  • Test runs and plans
  • Automation reporters
  • Defect linking
  • Public API
  • Requirement and review workflow

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Cypress

  • End-to-end testing for modern JavaScript web applicationsnot Qase
  • Continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test executionnot Qase
  • Visual regression testing and accessibility verificationnot Qase
  • Flaky test detection and eliminationnot Qase
  • Team collaboration on test maintenance and debuggingnot Qase

Qase

  • A QA lead introducing formal test management with no budget approval yetnot Cypress
  • Teams that want manual and automated results in one run history rather than two systemsnot Cypress
  • Organisations replacing TestRail on cost after a per seat renewal increasenot Cypress
  • Small teams needing exportable evidence of what was tested for a customer or auditornot Cypress

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Cypress

  • Limited to web applications; mobile and desktop app testing not supported
  • Free tier capped at 500 test results/month; insufficient for most development teams
  • Paid features (flake detection, analytics) not included in free tier
  • JavaScript/TypeScript focused; less suitable for polyglot organisations

Qase

  • Requirements traceability is shallower than the enterprise incumbents, so proving coverage against a numbered specification takes manual field discipline rather than a built in link.
  • It is a small vendor relative to Atlassian and Idera, and test management systems accumulate years of history, so continuity risk deserves weighing against the price saving.
  • The Jira integration is a link between two products rather than an application inside Jira, so teams that live entirely in Jira will still context switch, which is exactly what Zephyr avoids.
  • Reporting is adequate for a team and thin for a programme; consolidated quality metrics across many projects usually end up rebuilt in a BI tool.
  • Automation reporters cover the common runners well but anything unusual falls to the API, meaning someone has to build and maintain that integration.

Pricing, plan by plan

Cypress

Free
  • Starter (Free)Free
    • 500 test results/month
    • 100 prompt executions/month
    • Parallelisation
  • Team$67/month
    • 120k test results/year
    • 9k prompt executions/year
    • Flake detection
  • Business$267/month
    • 120k test results/year
    • 24k prompt executions/year
    • Spec prioritisation
  • Enterprise$undefined/custom
    • 1.8M test results/year
    • 60k prompt executions/year
    • Unlimited users

Qase

Free
  • Free$undefined/month
    • Small user limit with core case management and runs
    • Enough for a two or three person team to work in permanently
  • Paid tiers$undefined/month
    • Published per user monthly pricing rising with integrations, custom fields and reporting depth
    • Cheaper per seat than the established test management incumbents at comparable tiers

Which should you pick?

Choose Cypress if

  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on macOS, Windows, Linux.
Cypress review

Choose Qase if

  • You need case repository.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want test runs and plans.
Qase review

Questions people ask

Is Cypress or Qase better?
Neither clearly leads. Cypress starts at Free and Qase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Cypress or Qase?
Cypress starts at Free and Qase at Free.
Does Cypress or Qase run on more platforms?
Cypress runs on macOS, Windows, Linux. Qase runs on Web.
Can I use Cypress for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Cypress best used for?
Cypress is most often used for end-to-end testing for modern javascript web applications, continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test execution, visual regression testing and accessibility verification, flaky test detection and elimination. Of those, end-to-end testing for modern javascript web applications and continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test execution are not what Qase is typically brought in for.
What can Cypress do that Qase cannot?
Qase covers Case repository, Test runs and plans, Automation reporters, Defect linking.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Cypress: Is Cypress free?

Yes, Cypress offers a free Starter plan with 500 test results per month, 100 prompt executions monthly, 50 users, and 30-day data retention. No credit card is required.

Source
Qase: Can the free tier be used indefinitely?

Yes, within its user limit. It is a genuine free tier rather than a trial.

Cypress: How much does Cypress Team cost?

Cypress Team costs $67 per month when billed monthly or $799 per year for annual billing (11% savings). It includes 120,000 annual test results, 9,000 yearly prompt executions, 50 users, 90-day data retention, flake detection, Jira integration, and email support.

Source
Qase: Does it run tests?

No. It records what was run and what happened. Execution stays with your framework or your testers.

Cypress: What is the difference between Cypress Team and Business?

Cypress Business costs $267 per month (or $3,199 annually) compared to Team's $67/month ($799/year). Business provides twice the prompt executions (24,000 vs. 9,000 yearly), spec prioritization, auto-cancellation, and enterprise GitHub/GitLab support.

Source
Qase: How hard is migrating from TestRail?

Case import is straightforward; run history and custom field mappings are the part that takes time.

Cypress: Can I purchase additional test results on Cypress?

Yes, Cypress allows purchasing bundled on-demand test results. Team costs $6 per 1,000 results, Business costs $5 per 1,000, and Enterprise pricing is custom. Open-source projects qualify for complimentary cloud services.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on Cypress

More on Qase

Keep looking

Other head to heads