Testing · pricing
Qase pricing
Qase publishes 2 tiers. Below is each one, what it adds over the tier beneath it, and where the ladder stops being worth climbing for most people.
As of 31 August 2026, Qase pricing is free across 2 published tiers. Figures are the vendor's list prices as recorded on this page's last check; the vendor's site is the final word.
- Entry price
- Free
- Model
- Per user per month
- Tiers
- 2
- Free tier
- Yes
Qase plans, side by side
Every published tier in ascending order of price, with the number of features each one lists. An absence here means the record does not itemise it, not that the tier lacks it.
| Plan | Price | Features listed | Step up from the tier below |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | On request | 2 | Entry tier |
| Paid tiers | On request | 2 | Priced on request |
What each tier adds
The set difference between each tier's feature list and the one beneath it. Where a tier lists nothing new, the vendor has either stopped repeating the inherited list or the tier raises limits rather than adding capability, the record does not distinguish the two, so this page does not either.
Free
On requestThe entry tier. It covers small user limit with core case management and runs, enough for a two or three person team to work in permanently.
Paid tiers
On requestOver Free, this tier adds:
- Published per user monthly pricing rising with integrations, custom fields and reporting depth
- Cheaper per seat than the established test management incumbents at comparable tiers
What the product covers
The full Qase feature record, grouped as the catalogue groups it. This is the product as a whole; the record does not map every feature onto a specific tier.
Other
- Case repository
- Test runs and plans
- Automation reporters
- Defect linking
- Public API
- Requirement and review workflow
People bring Qase in for a qa lead introducing formal test management with no budget approval yet, teams that want manual and automated results in one run history rather than two systems, organisations replacing testrail on cost after a per seat renewal increase, small teams needing exportable evidence of what was tested for a customer or auditor. If that is not the job you are buying for, the alternatives to Qase are worth a look before you commit to a tier.
How that compares in Testing
Too few testing tools in this directory publish a starting price to quote a meaningful median, so the table below is a like-for-like list rather than a ranking.
| Tool | Entry price | Model | Rated | Head to head |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qase (this page) | Free | Per user per month | - | |
| Jest | Free | Open source, no licence fee | - | vs Qase |
| Cucumber | Free | Open source, no licence fee | - | vs Qase |
| Percy | Free | Freemium, paid tiers by screenshot volume | - | vs Qase |
| Detox | Free | Open source, no licence fee | - | vs Qase |
| Appium | Free | Open source, no licence fee | - | vs Qase |
| PractiTest | On request | Per user per month, yearly minimum on Corporate tier | - | vs Qase |
Ratings are aggregated from third-party sources and imported with each catalogue entry, they are not reviews hosted on Softwr. How each figure is used is set out on the Qase badges page.
Before you pay for Qase
Three things this page cannot tell you, and all three change the bill. The record carries a price and a billing period but not the unit - per-seat and flat-rate pricing are indistinguishable in this data, so a five-person team may be looking at five times the figure above. It carries no annual rate, so any discount for paying yearly is not something this page can quote. And it carries no trial length.
What it can tell you is the shape of the ladder: 2 tiers between On request and On request, with the jump itemised above. Because there is a free tier, the cheapest way to answer the rest is to use it before paying anything.
Qase runs on web, and is published by Qase of San Francisco, California, United States. The full record is on the Qase review, and the rest of the category is under best testing tools.
Qase pricing questions
- How much does Qase cost?
- Qase publishes 2 tiers, from On request for Free up to On request for Paid tiers. The entry tier costs nothing.
- Does Qase have a free plan?
- Yes, Qase is recorded as Per user per month, so it can be used without paying.
- What is the difference between Free and Paid tiers on Qase?
- Paid tiers costs On request against On request, and adds published per user monthly pricing rising with integrations, custom fields and reporting depth, cheaper per seat than the established test management incumbents at comparable tiers.
- Which testing tools can I use without paying?
- 6 of the 8 testing tools listed alongside Qase have a free tier: Jest, Cucumber, Percy, Detox, Appium.
- What am I actually paying for with Qase?
- The record lists 6 features across 1 area: other. In practice it is brought in for a qa lead introducing formal test management with no budget approval yet, teams that want manual and automated results in one run history rather than two systems, organisations replacing testrail on cost after a per seat renewal increase.
- Does Qase charge per user?
- The record carries a price and a billing period for each of its 2 tiers, but not the unit that price is charged in. Per-seat and flat-rate billing look identical in this data, so check the vendor's page before budgeting for a team.
- Are these Qase prices current?
- They are what the catalogue entry holds, refreshed when the entry is. Vendors change pricing without notice and nobody at Softwr re-verifies each tier by hand, so treat this as a structured summary and the vendor's own pricing page as the authority.
- What should I compare Qase against before paying?
- The closest testing tools in this directory are Jest, Cucumber, Percy, Detox. Each has a side-by-side comparison with Qase covering price, platforms and features.