Testing · head to head
Cypress vs Split

Cypress
Testing
JavaScript end-to-end testing framework with browser-based runner and cloud service
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Split
Testing
Feature flags tied to a metrics pipeline that attributes production impact to each release, now Harness FME
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Cypress has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cypress limited to web applications; mobile and desktop app testing not supported; Split split is now a module of the Harness platform and split.io redirects to harness.io, so buying it means entering a Harness commercial relationship rather than a standalone flag vendor contract.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cypress and Split actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Testing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cypress
Nothing recorded that Split does not also cover.
Only in Split
- Feature flags with targeting
- Metrics impact engine
- Guardrail metrics
- Statistical significance testing
- Event ingestion
- SDKs and streaming updates
- Audit and approvals
- Harness platform integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cypress
- End-to-end testing for modern JavaScript web applicationsnot Split
- Continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test executionnot Split
- Visual regression testing and accessibility verificationnot Split
- Flaky test detection and eliminationnot Split
- Team collaboration on test maintenance and debuggingnot Split
Split
- A product organisation that wants every release measured against conversion and latency by default, not only deliberate experimentsnot Cypress
- Running A/B tests with real statistical significance rather than comparing two dashboard linesnot Cypress
- Catching a regression at five per cent rollout because a guardrail metric fires before the change reaches everyonenot Cypress
- A team already committed to Harness for CI and CD that wants flags in the same platform and contractnot Cypress
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cypress
- Limited to web applications; mobile and desktop app testing not supported
- Free tier capped at 500 test results/month; insufficient for most development teams
- Paid features (flake detection, analytics) not included in free tier
- JavaScript/TypeScript focused; less suitable for polyglot organisations
Split
- Split is now a module of the Harness platform and split.io redirects to harness.io, so buying it means entering a Harness commercial relationship rather than a standalone flag vendor contract.
- Harness no longer publishes per-module prices, so an organisation that wants only feature management cannot get a list price and must negotiate a module out of a platform bundle.
- The measurement engine needs traffic volume to reach significance, so a product with modest usage gets flags with an experimentation layer it will rarely be able to conclude anything from.
- Metric attribution depends on correctly instrumented events flowing into Split, which is an integration project in its own right; without it you have paid for an experimentation platform and are using it as a flag switch.
- As part of a larger DevOps suite the roadmap now competes with CI, CD, security and cloud cost modules for attention, so feature management is no longer the company’s single focus the way it was as an independent product.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cypress
Free- Starter (Free)Free
- 500 test results/month
- 100 prompt executions/month
- Parallelisation
- Team$67/month
- 120k test results/year
- 9k prompt executions/year
- Flake detection
- Business$267/month
- 120k test results/year
- 24k prompt executions/year
- Spec prioritisation
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- 1.8M test results/year
- 60k prompt executions/year
- Unlimited users
Split
On request- Harness FreeFree
- Harness Open Source and community support
- Intended for individuals and small teams
- Feature management capability limited at this tier
- Harness Essentials$undefined/year
- Bundled DevOps modules including CI, CD, IaC and security testing
- Standard support
- Pricing requires contacting sales
- Harness Enterprise$undefined/year
- Mix and match from 15 or more modules including Feature Management and Experimentation
- Premier support with a dedicated account manager
- Higher pipeline concurrency and organisation limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Split if
- You need feature flags with targeting.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Java, Node.js, Python, Go, .NET.
- You also want metrics impact engine.
Questions people ask
- Is Cypress or Split better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cypress starts at Free and Split at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cypress or Split?
- Cypress has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cypress and On request for Split.
- Does Cypress or Split run on more platforms?
- Cypress runs on macOS, Windows, Linux. Split runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Java, Node.js, Python, Go, .NET.
- Can I use Cypress for free?
- Yes. Cypress has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Split starts at On request.
- What is Cypress best used for?
- Cypress is most often used for end-to-end testing for modern javascript web applications, continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test execution, visual regression testing and accessibility verification, flaky test detection and elimination. Of those, end-to-end testing for modern javascript web applications and continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test execution are not what Split is typically brought in for.
- What can Cypress do that Split cannot?
- Split covers Feature flags with targeting, Metrics impact engine, Guardrail metrics, Statistical significance testing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cypress: Is Cypress free?
Yes, Cypress offers a free Starter plan with 500 test results per month, 100 prompt executions monthly, 50 users, and 30-day data retention. No credit card is required.
SourceSplit: Is Split still called Split?
It is now sold as Harness Feature Management and Experimentation after the Harness acquisition, and split.io redirects to harness.io.
Cypress: How much does Cypress Team cost?
Cypress Team costs $67 per month when billed monthly or $799 per year for annual billing (11% savings). It includes 120,000 annual test results, 9,000 yearly prompt executions, 50 users, 90-day data retention, flake detection, Jira integration, and email support.
SourceSplit: Can I buy just feature flags?
Not from a price list. Harness publishes bundle tiers and directs single-module buyers to sales.
Cypress: What is the difference between Cypress Team and Business?
Cypress Business costs $267 per month (or $3,199 annually) compared to Team's $67/month ($799/year). Business provides twice the prompt executions (24,000 vs. 9,000 yearly), spec prioritization, auto-cancellation, and enterprise GitHub/GitLab support.
SourceSplit: What does it do that a plain flag service does not?
It attributes changes in your product metrics to specific flags with statistical significance testing and alerts on guardrail metrics.
Cypress: Can I purchase additional test results on Cypress?
Yes, Cypress allows purchasing bundled on-demand test results. Team costs $6 per 1,000 results, Business costs $5 per 1,000, and Enterprise pricing is custom. Open-source projects qualify for complimentary cloud services.
SourceSplit: Do we need a lot of traffic?
Yes. Statistical tests need volume to conclude, so low-traffic products get limited value from the measurement layer.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cypress vs Jest
- Cypress vs Applitools
- Cypress vs QA Wolf
- Cypress vs BrowserStack
- Cypress vs Selenium
- Cypress vs CircleCI
- Cypress vs Insomnia
- Cypress vs BugHerd
- Cypress vs Robot Framework
- Cypress vs mabl
- Cypress vs JUnit
- Cypress vs Detox
- Cypress vs Eppo
- Cypress vs GrowthBook
- Cypress vs k6
- Cypress vs Kameleoon
- Cypress vs Percy
- Cypress vs TestRail
- Cypress vs Katalon
- Cypress vs Sauce Labs
- Cypress vs Testsigma
- Cypress vs Vitest
- Cypress vs Cucumber
- Split vs Jest
- Split vs Applitools
- Split vs QA Wolf
- Split vs BrowserStack
- Split vs Selenium
- Split vs CircleCI
- Split vs Insomnia
- Split vs BugHerd
- Split vs Robot Framework
- Split vs mabl
- Split vs JUnit
- Split vs Detox
- Split vs Eppo
- Split vs GrowthBook
- Split vs k6
- Split vs Kameleoon
- Split vs Percy
- Split vs TestRail
- Split vs Katalon
- Split vs Sauce Labs
- Split vs Testsigma
- Split vs Vitest
- Split vs Cucumber
