Testing · head to head
Cypress vs Kameleoon

Cypress
Testing
JavaScript end-to-end testing framework with browser-based runner and cloud service
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Kameleoon
Testing
A/B testing and feature experimentation with a hybrid client and server-side engine
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Cypress has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cypress limited to web applications; mobile and desktop app testing not supported; Kameleoon no rate card is published. Reported entry pricing around several hundred euros a month for the limited prompt-based tier comes from third parties rather than Kameleoon, so any budget you build before contacting sales is a guess.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cypress and Kameleoon actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Testing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cypress
Nothing recorded that Kameleoon does not also cover.
Only in Kameleoon
- Visual A/B test editor
- Server-side experimentation
- Feature flags
- Anti-flicker engine
- AI personalisation
- EU data hosting
- Shared audiences
- Statistics options
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cypress
- End-to-end testing for modern JavaScript web applicationsnot Kameleoon
- Continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test executionnot Kameleoon
- Visual regression testing and accessibility verificationnot Kameleoon
- Flaky test detection and eliminationnot Kameleoon
- Team collaboration on test maintenance and debuggingnot Kameleoon
Kameleoon
- A European retailer whose legal team requires EU-hosted experimentation data and has ruled out US-only vendorsnot Cypress
- A team running both marketing page tests and product feature rollouts that wants one results engine rather than two disagreeing onesnot Cypress
- A media site where client-side flicker on a test variant is visibly damaging the reading experiencenot Cypress
- An organisation re-tendering experimentation after Optimizely or VWO pricing changes and wanting an independent European vendornot Cypress
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cypress
- Limited to web applications; mobile and desktop app testing not supported
- Free tier capped at 500 test results/month; insufficient for most development teams
- Paid features (flake detection, analytics) not included in free tier
- JavaScript/TypeScript focused; less suitable for polyglot organisations
Kameleoon
- No rate card is published. Reported entry pricing around several hundred euros a month for the limited prompt-based tier comes from third parties rather than Kameleoon, so any budget you build before contacting sales is a guess.
- Web experimentation, feature experimentation and personalisation are licensed as separate capabilities, so the unified platform story costs materially more than the entry configuration most buyers are first quoted.
- The partner and agency ecosystem is concentrated in France and continental Europe; a buyer in North America or Asia will find fewer implementation specialists and less community knowledge than for Optimizely or VWO.
- The integration catalogue is smaller than the market leaders, so a stack built on less common analytics or CDP tooling may need custom work that a larger vendor would cover natively.
- Client-side visual testing still carries the structural problems of the approach, including performance cost and single-page-application fragility; the anti-flicker engine reduces the symptom but does not remove the dependency on the DOM staying stable.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cypress
Free- Starter (Free)Free
- 500 test results/month
- 100 prompt executions/month
- Parallelisation
- Team$67/month
- 120k test results/year
- 9k prompt executions/year
- Flake detection
- Business$267/month
- 120k test results/year
- 24k prompt executions/year
- Spec prioritisation
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- 1.8M test results/year
- 60k prompt executions/year
- Unlimited users
Kameleoon
On request- Kameleoon$undefined/year
- Priced on monthly tested users and features licensed
- Web experimentation, feature experimentation and personalisation licensed separately
- Free trial of the prompt-based experimentation feature, with data not retained afterwards
Which should you pick?
Choose Kameleoon if
- You need visual a/b test editor.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want server-side experimentation.
Questions people ask
- Is Cypress or Kameleoon better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cypress starts at Free and Kameleoon at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cypress or Kameleoon?
- Cypress has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cypress and On request for Kameleoon.
- Does Cypress or Kameleoon run on more platforms?
- Cypress runs on macOS, Windows, Linux. Kameleoon runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Cypress for free?
- Yes. Cypress has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Kameleoon starts at On request.
- What is Cypress best used for?
- Cypress is most often used for end-to-end testing for modern javascript web applications, continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test execution, visual regression testing and accessibility verification, flaky test detection and elimination. Of those, end-to-end testing for modern javascript web applications and continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test execution are not what Kameleoon is typically brought in for.
- What can Cypress do that Kameleoon cannot?
- Kameleoon covers Visual A/B test editor, Server-side experimentation, Feature flags, Anti-flicker engine.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cypress: Is Cypress free?
Yes, Cypress offers a free Starter plan with 500 test results per month, 100 prompt executions monthly, 50 users, and 30-day data retention. No credit card is required.
SourceKameleoon: Does Kameleoon publish pricing?
No. Pricing depends on monthly tested users and which capabilities you licence, and requires a sales conversation.
Cypress: How much does Cypress Team cost?
Cypress Team costs $67 per month when billed monthly or $799 per year for annual billing (11% savings). It includes 120,000 annual test results, 9,000 yearly prompt executions, 50 users, 90-day data retention, flake detection, Jira integration, and email support.
SourceKameleoon: Can I keep data in the EU?
Yes. EU hosting and a GDPR-first consent model are among the main reasons European buyers shortlist it.
Cypress: What is the difference between Cypress Team and Business?
Cypress Business costs $267 per month (or $3,199 annually) compared to Team's $67/month ($799/year). Business provides twice the prompt executions (24,000 vs. 9,000 yearly), spec prioritization, auto-cancellation, and enterprise GitHub/GitLab support.
SourceKameleoon: Does it do feature flags as well as A/B tests?
Yes, through server-side SDKs, sharing audiences and results with the visual testing side.
Cypress: Can I purchase additional test results on Cypress?
Yes, Cypress allows purchasing bundled on-demand test results. Team costs $6 per 1,000 results, Business costs $5 per 1,000, and Enterprise pricing is custom. Open-source projects qualify for complimentary cloud services.
SourceKameleoon: How does it compare with Optimizely?
Similar capability at a smaller scale. Kameleoon's advantages are European data residency and an independent vendor; Optimizely's are ecosystem size and partner availability.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cypress vs Jest
- Cypress vs Applitools
- Cypress vs QA Wolf
- Cypress vs BrowserStack
- Cypress vs Selenium
- Cypress vs CircleCI
- Cypress vs Insomnia
- Cypress vs BugHerd
- Cypress vs Robot Framework
- Cypress vs mabl
- Cypress vs JUnit
- Cypress vs Detox
- Cypress vs Eppo
- Cypress vs GrowthBook
- Cypress vs k6
- Cypress vs Percy
- Cypress vs Split
- Cypress vs Appium
- Cypress vs TestRail
- Cypress vs Qase
- Cypress vs Vitest
- Cypress vs PractiTest
- Cypress vs Ranorex
- Cypress vs Sauce Labs
- Cypress vs Xray Test Management
- Cypress vs Zephyr Scale
- Cypress vs WebdriverIO
- Kameleoon vs Jest
- Kameleoon vs Applitools
- Kameleoon vs QA Wolf
- Kameleoon vs BrowserStack
- Kameleoon vs Selenium
- Kameleoon vs CircleCI
- Kameleoon vs Insomnia
- Kameleoon vs BugHerd
- Kameleoon vs Robot Framework
- Kameleoon vs mabl
- Kameleoon vs JUnit
- Kameleoon vs Detox
- Kameleoon vs Eppo
- Kameleoon vs GrowthBook
- Kameleoon vs k6
- Kameleoon vs Percy
- Kameleoon vs Split
- Kameleoon vs Appium
- Kameleoon vs TestRail
- Kameleoon vs Qase
- Kameleoon vs Vitest
- Kameleoon vs PractiTest
- Kameleoon vs Ranorex
- Kameleoon vs Sauce Labs
- Kameleoon vs Xray Test Management
- Kameleoon vs Zephyr Scale
- Kameleoon vs WebdriverIO
