Softwr

Testing · head to head

Cypress vs Kameleoon

Cypress logo

Cypress

Testing

JavaScript end-to-end testing framework with browser-based runner and cloud service

From
Free
Rated
-
Kameleoon logo

Kameleoon

Testing

A/B testing and feature experimentation with a hybrid client and server-side engine

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Cypress has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Cypress limited to web applications; mobile and desktop app testing not supported; Kameleoon no rate card is published. Reported entry pricing around several hundred euros a month for the limited prompt-based tier comes from third parties rather than Kameleoon, so any budget you build before contacting sales is a guess.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Cypress and Kameleoon actually diverge.

Attributes where Cypress and Kameleoon differ
AttributeCypressKameleoon
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelfreemiumquote
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsmacOS, Windows, LinuxWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Testing).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Cypress

Nothing recorded that Kameleoon does not also cover.

Only in Kameleoon

  • Visual A/B test editor
  • Server-side experimentation
  • Feature flags
  • Anti-flicker engine
  • AI personalisation
  • EU data hosting
  • Shared audiences
  • Statistics options

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Cypress

  • End-to-end testing for modern JavaScript web applicationsnot Kameleoon
  • Continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test executionnot Kameleoon
  • Visual regression testing and accessibility verificationnot Kameleoon
  • Flaky test detection and eliminationnot Kameleoon
  • Team collaboration on test maintenance and debuggingnot Kameleoon

Kameleoon

  • A European retailer whose legal team requires EU-hosted experimentation data and has ruled out US-only vendorsnot Cypress
  • A team running both marketing page tests and product feature rollouts that wants one results engine rather than two disagreeing onesnot Cypress
  • A media site where client-side flicker on a test variant is visibly damaging the reading experiencenot Cypress
  • An organisation re-tendering experimentation after Optimizely or VWO pricing changes and wanting an independent European vendornot Cypress

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Cypress

  • Limited to web applications; mobile and desktop app testing not supported
  • Free tier capped at 500 test results/month; insufficient for most development teams
  • Paid features (flake detection, analytics) not included in free tier
  • JavaScript/TypeScript focused; less suitable for polyglot organisations

Kameleoon

  • No rate card is published. Reported entry pricing around several hundred euros a month for the limited prompt-based tier comes from third parties rather than Kameleoon, so any budget you build before contacting sales is a guess.
  • Web experimentation, feature experimentation and personalisation are licensed as separate capabilities, so the unified platform story costs materially more than the entry configuration most buyers are first quoted.
  • The partner and agency ecosystem is concentrated in France and continental Europe; a buyer in North America or Asia will find fewer implementation specialists and less community knowledge than for Optimizely or VWO.
  • The integration catalogue is smaller than the market leaders, so a stack built on less common analytics or CDP tooling may need custom work that a larger vendor would cover natively.
  • Client-side visual testing still carries the structural problems of the approach, including performance cost and single-page-application fragility; the anti-flicker engine reduces the symptom but does not remove the dependency on the DOM staying stable.

Pricing, plan by plan

Cypress

Free
  • Starter (Free)Free
    • 500 test results/month
    • 100 prompt executions/month
    • Parallelisation
  • Team$67/month
    • 120k test results/year
    • 9k prompt executions/year
    • Flake detection
  • Business$267/month
    • 120k test results/year
    • 24k prompt executions/year
    • Spec prioritisation
  • Enterprise$undefined/custom
    • 1.8M test results/year
    • 60k prompt executions/year
    • Unlimited users

Kameleoon

On request
  • Kameleoon$undefined/year
    • Priced on monthly tested users and features licensed
    • Web experimentation, feature experimentation and personalisation licensed separately
    • Free trial of the prompt-based experimentation feature, with data not retained afterwards

Which should you pick?

Choose Cypress if

  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on macOS, Windows, Linux.

Choose Kameleoon if

  • You need visual a/b test editor.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want server-side experimentation.

Questions people ask

Is Cypress or Kameleoon better?
Neither clearly leads. Cypress starts at Free and Kameleoon at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Cypress or Kameleoon?
Cypress has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cypress and On request for Kameleoon.
Does Cypress or Kameleoon run on more platforms?
Cypress runs on macOS, Windows, Linux. Kameleoon runs on Web, iOS, Android.
Can I use Cypress for free?
Yes. Cypress has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Kameleoon starts at On request.
What is Cypress best used for?
Cypress is most often used for end-to-end testing for modern javascript web applications, continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test execution, visual regression testing and accessibility verification, flaky test detection and elimination. Of those, end-to-end testing for modern javascript web applications and continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test execution are not what Kameleoon is typically brought in for.
What can Cypress do that Kameleoon cannot?
Kameleoon covers Visual A/B test editor, Server-side experimentation, Feature flags, Anti-flicker engine.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Cypress: Is Cypress free?

Yes, Cypress offers a free Starter plan with 500 test results per month, 100 prompt executions monthly, 50 users, and 30-day data retention. No credit card is required.

Source
Kameleoon: Does Kameleoon publish pricing?

No. Pricing depends on monthly tested users and which capabilities you licence, and requires a sales conversation.

Cypress: How much does Cypress Team cost?

Cypress Team costs $67 per month when billed monthly or $799 per year for annual billing (11% savings). It includes 120,000 annual test results, 9,000 yearly prompt executions, 50 users, 90-day data retention, flake detection, Jira integration, and email support.

Source
Kameleoon: Can I keep data in the EU?

Yes. EU hosting and a GDPR-first consent model are among the main reasons European buyers shortlist it.

Cypress: What is the difference between Cypress Team and Business?

Cypress Business costs $267 per month (or $3,199 annually) compared to Team's $67/month ($799/year). Business provides twice the prompt executions (24,000 vs. 9,000 yearly), spec prioritization, auto-cancellation, and enterprise GitHub/GitLab support.

Source
Kameleoon: Does it do feature flags as well as A/B tests?

Yes, through server-side SDKs, sharing audiences and results with the visual testing side.

Cypress: Can I purchase additional test results on Cypress?

Yes, Cypress allows purchasing bundled on-demand test results. Team costs $6 per 1,000 results, Business costs $5 per 1,000, and Enterprise pricing is custom. Open-source projects qualify for complimentary cloud services.

Source
Kameleoon: How does it compare with Optimizely?

Similar capability at a smaller scale. Kameleoon's advantages are European data residency and an independent vendor; Optimizely's are ecosystem size and partner availability.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads