Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs Weavr

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -

Weavr
APIs
Packaged embedded finance for B2B SaaS, with an in-house EU e-money licence
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; Weavr products are packaged rather than open, so a flow Weavr does not support is not something you can build around, and you discover the limits after integrating.
- They diverge on capability: Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Weavr covers Plug-and-play products.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and Weavr actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in Weavr
- Plug-and-play products
- Regulated cover
- Card issuing
- Multi-currency accounts
- Identity and onboarding
- Data insights
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot Weavr
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot Weavr
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot Weavr
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot Weavr
Weavr
- A project management SaaS adding expense cards without hiring a compliance officernot Cyclr
- A marketplace paying out sellers from accounts held inside its own productnot Cyclr
- A procurement platform issuing virtual cards against approved purchase ordersnot Cyclr
- A European SaaS vendor wanting a regulated entity to sit behind its financial featuresnot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
Weavr
- Products are packaged rather than open, so a flow Weavr does not support is not something you can build around, and you discover the limits after integrating.
- Programme economics depend on interchange, and SaaS vendors routinely overestimate how much card volume their customers will actually route through the embedded product.
- It is a small company with limited headcount supporting a regulated dependency, which is a real concentration risk for a feature your customers rely on.
- Monthly minimums on card programmes mean a slow-adopting customer base leaves you paying for volume you never reach.
- European interchange caps hold programme revenue well below what US embedded finance case studies suggest, so imported business cases do not transfer.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
Weavr
On request- Weavr embedded finance$undefined/year
- Platform subscription plus per-account and per-card fees
- Interchange share negotiated as part of the commercial terms
- Monthly minimums apply to card programmes
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Choose Weavr if
- You need plug-and-play products.
- You work on Web, REST API.
- You also want regulated cover.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or Weavr better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Weavr at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or Weavr?
- Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Weavr at On request.
- Does Cyclr or Weavr run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. Weavr runs on Web, REST API.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what Weavr is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that Weavr cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors. Weavr covers Plug-and-play products, Regulated cover, Card issuing, Multi-currency accounts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
Weavr: Do I need my own financial licence?
No. Weavr holds an e-money licence, including a Maltese authorisation for the EU, and acts as the regulated entity for the embedded product.
Cyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
Weavr: How is it different from a banking-as-a-service API?
It sells finished product shapes with compliance built in rather than raw banking primitives, which trades flexibility for a much shorter route to launch.
Cyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
Weavr: How does Weavr make money?
Platform fees plus per-account and per-card charges, with a negotiated share of card interchange.
Cyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Dagster
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs Integromat
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs Griffin
- Cyclr vs Enfuce
- Cyclr vs Unit
- Cyclr vs Synctera
- Cyclr vs Swan
- Cyclr vs Solaris
- Cyclr vs Vodeno
- Cyclr vs Thredd
- Cyclr vs Treasury Prime
- Cyclr vs Fintech Farm
- Cyclr vs Highnote
- Cyclr vs Lithic
- Cyclr vs Fintecture
- Cyclr vs Formance
- Cyclr vs GraphQL Apollo
- Cyclr vs GraphQL Playground
- Cyclr vs Gravitee
- Cyclr vs Hoppscotch
- Weavr vs Tray.io
- Weavr vs Celigo
- Weavr vs Workato
- Weavr vs Alloy Automation
- Weavr vs Paragon
- Weavr vs Nango
- Weavr vs Merge
- Weavr vs Hatchet
- Weavr vs Zapier
- Weavr vs MuleSoft
- Weavr vs Dagster
- Weavr vs Fivetran
- Weavr vs Informatica
- Weavr vs Integromat
- Weavr vs jBPM
- Weavr vs Kogito
- Weavr vs Letta
- Weavr vs Lytics
- Weavr vs Griffin
- Weavr vs Enfuce
- Weavr vs Unit
- Weavr vs Synctera
- Weavr vs Swan
- Weavr vs Solaris
- Weavr vs Vodeno
- Weavr vs Thredd
- Weavr vs Treasury Prime
- Weavr vs Fintech Farm
- Weavr vs Highnote
- Weavr vs Lithic
- Weavr vs Fintecture
- Weavr vs Formance
- Weavr vs GraphQL Apollo
- Weavr vs GraphQL Playground
- Weavr vs Gravitee
- Weavr vs Hoppscotch
