Cybersecurity · head to head
CyberGhost VPN vs Periscope Holdings
CyberGhost VPN
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN operated from Romania and owned by Kape Technologies, with a no-logs claim audited by Deloitte.
- From
- $2.19/month
- Free plan
- No

Periscope Holdings
Government
Statewide e-procurement systems and supplier networks for large public agencies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CyberGhost VPN kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.; Periscope Holdings it is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- They diverge on capability: CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers, Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CyberGhost VPN and Periscope Holdings actually diverge.
| Attribute | CyberGhost VPN | Periscope Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2.19/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Mobile | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | 2011 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CyberGhost VPN
- NoSpy servers
- Audited no-logs policy
- WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2
- Streaming-labelled servers
- Dedicated IP via token
- Kill switch
- Split tunnelling
- Smart Rules
Only in Periscope Holdings
- Sealed bid solicitation
- Supplier registration network
- Contract catalogues
- Cooperative purchasing
- Spend and compliance reporting
- Supplier diversity tracking
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CyberGhost VPN
- A household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public Wi-Finot Periscope Holdings
- A buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the Fourteen Eyes with a published third-party no-logs auditnot Periscope Holdings
- Torrenting on a connection where the internet provider throttles or logs peer-to-peer trafficnot Periscope Holdings
- Travellers needing to reach home-country services from abroad without configuring anything technicalnot Periscope Holdings
Periscope Holdings
- A state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entitiesnot CyberGhost VPN
- A large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening recordnot CyberGhost VPN
- A purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entitiesnot CyberGhost VPN
- A state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contractsnot CyberGhost VPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CyberGhost VPN
- Kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.
- Pricing is structured so that the deep discount applies to the longest initial term and the standard rate applies at renewal, which means the figure used to make the decision is not the figure paid in year three unless the subscriber renegotiates or churns.
- The Deloitte engagement is point-in-time assurance over stated policy and server configuration, so it confirms things were as described when examined and says nothing about how the infrastructure behaves today or after an ownership change.
- Client capability differs sharply by platform: the Linux client is command-line only and lacks the kill switch and split tunnelling that the Windows client has, so a mixed-device household does not get the protection that reviews of the Windows app describe.
- Streaming-optimised server labels go stale because platforms block address ranges continually, and the practical support answer is to try a different server, which makes the labelled-server feature less dependable than the marketing implies.
Periscope Holdings
- It is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- The interface reflects the age and regulatory weight of the platform, and suppliers routinely describe registration and bidding as harder than on newer portals, which can suppress bid response.
- Ownership has changed twice since 2021, from independent to mdf commerce to KKR, so roadmap and support continuity should be written into the contract rather than assumed.
- Sibling products inside mdf commerce cover adjacent procurement ground, which means an apparently competitive shortlist may contain two products with the same owner.
- Statewide implementations are multi year projects with heavy configuration and change management, and the professional services cost commonly exceeds the software over the contract term.
Pricing, plan by plan
CyberGhost VPN
$2.19/month- 1 Month$12.99/month
- 7 devices
- 9000+ servers
- Unlimited bandwidth
- 2 Years + 2 Months$2.19/month
- All features
- Best value
- 45-day guarantee
- 6 Months$6.99/month
- All features
- 45-day guarantee
Periscope Holdings
On request- BuySpeed$undefined/year
- Quoted per programme, scaled to entities served and transaction volume
- Multi year statewide contracts with implementation priced separately
- Supplier side registration fees form part of the commercial model on some programmes
Which should you pick?
Choose CyberGhost VPN if
- You need nospy servers.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want audited no-logs policy.
Choose Periscope Holdings if
- You need sealed bid solicitation.
- You also want supplier registration network.
Questions people ask
- Is CyberGhost VPN or Periscope Holdings better?
- Neither clearly leads. CyberGhost VPN starts at $2.19/month and Periscope Holdings at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CyberGhost VPN or Periscope Holdings?
- CyberGhost VPN starts at $2.19/month and Periscope Holdings at On request.
- Does CyberGhost VPN or Periscope Holdings run on more platforms?
- CyberGhost VPN runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile. Periscope Holdings runs on Web.
- What is CyberGhost VPN best used for?
- CyberGhost VPN is most often used for a household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public wi-fi, a buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the fourteen eyes with a published third-party no-logs audit, torrenting on a connection where the internet provider throttles or logs peer-to-peer traffic, travellers needing to reach home-country services from abroad without configuring anything technical. Of those, a household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public wi-fi and a buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the fourteen eyes with a published third-party no-logs audit are not what Periscope Holdings is typically brought in for.
- What can CyberGhost VPN do that Periscope Holdings cannot?
- CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers, Audited no-logs policy, WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2, Streaming-labelled servers. Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, Supplier registration network, Contract catalogues, Cooperative purchasing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CyberGhost VPN: Who owns CyberGhost?
Kape Technologies, which acquired it in 2017. Kape was formerly called Crossrider and also owns ExpressVPN, Private Internet Access and Zenmate, plus the review sites vpnMentor and Wizcase.
Periscope Holdings: Who owns Periscope Holdings?
mdf commerce acquired it in 2021, and mdf commerce was itself acquired by KKR in 2024.
CyberGhost VPN: Has the no-logs claim been independently audited?
Yes. Deloitte has examined the no-logs policy and server configuration and published an assurance report. Note that this is a point-in-time engagement, not continuous monitoring.
Periscope Holdings: Is it suitable for a single city?
Usually not. It is built and priced for statewide or very large agency programmes.
CyberGhost VPN: What jurisdiction is it under?
The service is operated from Romania, which has no mandatory communications data retention law in force and is not a member of the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes intelligence-sharing arrangements. Ownership sits with Kape, headquartered in the UK.
Periscope Holdings: What is BuySpeed?
The e-procurement platform behind its statewide deployments, covering solicitation through catalogue ordering and reporting.
CyberGhost VPN: Does it work with streaming services?
Often, using the servers labelled for each service, but this changes constantly as platforms block address ranges. Treat streaming access as a feature that may stop working on any given day rather than a guarantee.
Periscope Holdings: Can we see what a state paid?
Yes. State procurement awards are public records and typically disclose the full multi year contract value.
CyberGhost VPN: Can I use it on Linux or a router?
There is a command-line Linux client with fewer features than the desktop apps, and router use requires manual OpenVPN configuration rather than an official app.
Related pages
More on CyberGhost VPN
More on Periscope Holdings
Other head to heads
- CyberGhost VPN vs Surfshark
- CyberGhost VPN vs Norton 360
- CyberGhost VPN vs 1Password
- CyberGhost VPN vs Bitdefender Total Security
- CyberGhost VPN vs LastPass
- CyberGhost VPN vs NordVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Private Internet Access
- CyberGhost VPN vs TunnelBear
- CyberGhost VPN vs Mullvad VPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Windscribe
- CyberGhost VPN vs Avast One
- CyberGhost VPN vs IVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sigstore
- CyberGhost VPN vs Speakeasy
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sysdig
- CyberGhost VPN vs Tenable
- CyberGhost VPN vs Trend Micro Vision One
- CyberGhost VPN vs Euna Solutions
- CyberGhost VPN vs Bidnet Direct
- CyberGhost VPN vs OpenGov
- CyberGhost VPN vs Bonfire
- CyberGhost VPN vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- CyberGhost VPN vs NEOGOV
- CyberGhost VPN vs ArchiveSocial
- CyberGhost VPN vs Clariti
- CyberGhost VPN vs GovPilot
- CyberGhost VPN vs mySidewalk
- CyberGhost VPN vs SAP for Government
- CyberGhost VPN vs Axon Records
- CyberGhost VPN vs CitizenLab
- CyberGhost VPN vs ClearGov
- CyberGhost VPN vs eCode360
- CyberGhost VPN vs MyRec.com
- CyberGhost VPN vs DemandStar
- Periscope Holdings vs Surfshark
- Periscope Holdings vs Norton 360
- Periscope Holdings vs 1Password
- Periscope Holdings vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Periscope Holdings vs LastPass
- Periscope Holdings vs NordVPN
- Periscope Holdings vs Private Internet Access
- Periscope Holdings vs TunnelBear
- Periscope Holdings vs Mullvad VPN
- Periscope Holdings vs Windscribe
- Periscope Holdings vs Avast One
- Periscope Holdings vs IVPN
- Periscope Holdings vs Sigstore
- Periscope Holdings vs Speakeasy
- Periscope Holdings vs Sysdig
- Periscope Holdings vs Tenable
- Periscope Holdings vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Periscope Holdings vs Euna Solutions
- Periscope Holdings vs Bidnet Direct
- Periscope Holdings vs OpenGov
- Periscope Holdings vs Bonfire
- Periscope Holdings vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Periscope Holdings vs NEOGOV
- Periscope Holdings vs ArchiveSocial
- Periscope Holdings vs Clariti
- Periscope Holdings vs GovPilot
- Periscope Holdings vs mySidewalk
- Periscope Holdings vs SAP for Government
- Periscope Holdings vs Axon Records
- Periscope Holdings vs CitizenLab
- Periscope Holdings vs ClearGov
- Periscope Holdings vs eCode360
- Periscope Holdings vs MyRec.com
- Periscope Holdings vs DemandStar
