Government · head to head
CitizenLab vs Periscope Holdings

Periscope Holdings
Government
Statewide e-procurement systems and supplier networks for large public agencies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CitizenLab citizenLab has rebranded to Go Vocal and the product now sells under govocal.com; Periscope Holdings it is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- They diverge on capability: CitizenLab covers Participatory Budgeting, Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CitizenLab and Periscope Holdings actually diverge.
| Attribute | CitizenLab | Periscope Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $500/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android | Web |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Government).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CitizenLab
- Participatory Budgeting
- Idea Management
- Online Consultations
- Surveys & Polls
- AI-powered Analysis
- Single Sign-On
- Open Data Portals
- GIS Systems
Only in Periscope Holdings
- Sealed bid solicitation
- Supplier registration network
- Contract catalogues
- Cooperative purchasing
- Spend and compliance reporting
- Supplier diversity tracking
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CitizenLab
- Running community consultation and participatory budgeting for a citynot Periscope Holdings
- Collecting resident input through surveys, ideation, mapping and votingnot Periscope Holdings
- Centralising engagement data across multiple municipal departmentsnot Periscope Holdings
Periscope Holdings
- A state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entitiesnot CitizenLab
- A large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening recordnot CitizenLab
- A purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entitiesnot CitizenLab
- A state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contractsnot CitizenLab
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CitizenLab
- CitizenLab has rebranded to Go Vocal and the product now sells under govocal.com
- No prices are published on the plans page; every tier requires scheduling a demo
- The Essential plan allows only 1 active project and 1 admin seat, with no project manager seats
- Standard is limited to 4 admin seats and 5 project manager seats, and Premium to 8 admin seats and 25 project manager seats
- Standard restricts Sensemaking to Light, capped at 30 inputs; auto-insights require Premium
- The integrated Konveio document annotation and Echo blended engagement methods are excluded from Standard and require Premium
- Auto-translation on Premium is limited to 3 languages
- Custom fonts and other premium styling options are Premium only
- Priority support is Premium only
- Plans are split by population band, with separate ladders for cities under and over 100K population
Periscope Holdings
- It is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- The interface reflects the age and regulatory weight of the platform, and suppliers routinely describe registration and bidding as harder than on newer portals, which can suppress bid response.
- Ownership has changed twice since 2021, from independent to mdf commerce to KKR, so roadmap and support continuity should be written into the contract rather than assumed.
- Sibling products inside mdf commerce cover adjacent procurement ground, which means an apparently competitive shortlist may contain two products with the same owner.
- Statewide implementations are multi year projects with heavy configuration and change management, and the professional services cost commonly exceeds the software over the contract term.
Pricing, plan by plan
CitizenLab
$500/month- Government$500/month
- Participatory Budgeting
- Idea Collection
- Surveys
Periscope Holdings
On request- BuySpeed$undefined/year
- Quoted per programme, scaled to entities served and transaction volume
- Multi year statewide contracts with implementation priced separately
- Supplier side registration fees form part of the commercial model on some programmes
Which should you pick?
Choose CitizenLab if
- You need participatory budgeting.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want idea management.
Choose Periscope Holdings if
- You need sealed bid solicitation.
- You also want supplier registration network.
Questions people ask
- Is CitizenLab or Periscope Holdings better?
- Neither clearly leads. CitizenLab starts at $500/month and Periscope Holdings at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CitizenLab or Periscope Holdings?
- CitizenLab starts at $500/month and Periscope Holdings at On request.
- Does CitizenLab or Periscope Holdings run on more platforms?
- CitizenLab runs on Web, Ios, Android. Periscope Holdings runs on Web.
- What is CitizenLab best used for?
- CitizenLab is most often used for running community consultation and participatory budgeting for a city, collecting resident input through surveys, ideation, mapping and voting, centralising engagement data across multiple municipal departments. Of those, running community consultation and participatory budgeting for a city and collecting resident input through surveys, ideation, mapping and voting are not what Periscope Holdings is typically brought in for.
- What can CitizenLab do that Periscope Holdings cannot?
- CitizenLab covers Participatory Budgeting, Idea Management, Online Consultations, Surveys & Polls. Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, Supplier registration network, Contract catalogues, Cooperative purchasing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CitizenLab: How many projects can Essential tier teams manage?
The Essential tier is designed for teams starting small and is limited to 1 active project with 1 admin seat and no project manager seats.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Who owns Periscope Holdings?
mdf commerce acquired it in 2021, and mdf commerce was itself acquired by KKR in 2024.
CitizenLab: How many projects can Standard and Premium tiers manage?
Both Standard and Premium tiers support unlimited projects. Standard includes 4 admin seats and 5 project manager seats, while Premium includes 8 admin seats and 25 project manager seats.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Is it suitable for a single city?
Usually not. It is built and priced for statewide or very large agency programmes.
CitizenLab: Does Enterprise tier have any user seat limits?
No, the Enterprise tier is designed for organizations aiming to embed engagement deeply within their infrastructure and includes unlimited admin seats and project managers.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: What is BuySpeed?
The e-procurement platform behind its statewide deployments, covering solicitation through catalogue ordering and reporting.
CitizenLab: What are the specific pricing amounts for each tier?
Specific pricing amounts are not disclosed on the plans page. The company directs interested organizations to talk to their team for personalized pricing offers.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Can we see what a state paid?
Yes. State procurement awards are public records and typically disclose the full multi year contract value.
Related pages
More on Periscope Holdings
Other head to heads
- CitizenLab vs CivicPlus
- CitizenLab vs Granicus
- CitizenLab vs Accela
- CitizenLab vs DocuWare
- CitizenLab vs Zencity
- CitizenLab vs Polco
- CitizenLab vs Nextdoor for Government
- CitizenLab vs Ring Neighbors
- CitizenLab vs CentralSquare
- CitizenLab vs CityView
- CitizenLab vs PublicInput
- CitizenLab vs MyRec.com
- CitizenLab vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- CitizenLab vs NextRequest
- CitizenLab vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- CitizenLab vs VUEWorks
- CitizenLab vs American Legal Publishing
- CitizenLab vs Bang the Table
- CitizenLab vs Euna Solutions
- CitizenLab vs Bidnet Direct
- CitizenLab vs OpenGov
- CitizenLab vs Bonfire
- CitizenLab vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- CitizenLab vs NEOGOV
- CitizenLab vs ArchiveSocial
- CitizenLab vs Clariti
- CitizenLab vs GovPilot
- CitizenLab vs mySidewalk
- CitizenLab vs SAP for Government
- CitizenLab vs Axon Records
- CitizenLab vs ClearGov
- CitizenLab vs eCode360
- CitizenLab vs DemandStar
- Periscope Holdings vs CivicPlus
- Periscope Holdings vs Granicus
- Periscope Holdings vs Accela
- Periscope Holdings vs DocuWare
- Periscope Holdings vs Zencity
- Periscope Holdings vs Polco
- Periscope Holdings vs Nextdoor for Government
- Periscope Holdings vs Ring Neighbors
- Periscope Holdings vs CentralSquare
- Periscope Holdings vs CityView
- Periscope Holdings vs PublicInput
- Periscope Holdings vs MyRec.com
- Periscope Holdings vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Periscope Holdings vs NextRequest
- Periscope Holdings vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Periscope Holdings vs VUEWorks
- Periscope Holdings vs American Legal Publishing
- Periscope Holdings vs Bang the Table
- Periscope Holdings vs Euna Solutions
- Periscope Holdings vs Bidnet Direct
- Periscope Holdings vs OpenGov
- Periscope Holdings vs Bonfire
- Periscope Holdings vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Periscope Holdings vs NEOGOV
- Periscope Holdings vs ArchiveSocial
- Periscope Holdings vs Clariti
- Periscope Holdings vs GovPilot
- Periscope Holdings vs mySidewalk
- Periscope Holdings vs SAP for Government
- Periscope Holdings vs Axon Records
- Periscope Holdings vs ClearGov
- Periscope Holdings vs eCode360
- Periscope Holdings vs DemandStar

