Government · head to head
Periscope Holdings vs Windscribe

Periscope Holdings
Government
Statewide e-procurement systems and supplier networks for large public agencies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
Windscribe
Cybersecurity
VPN and firewall service with a generous free data tier and a customizable Build-A-Plan option
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Windscribe has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Periscope Holdings it is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.; Windscribe free tier's 10GB cap still requires email confirmation and social sharing to unlock, unlike some no-strings-attached competitors.
- They diverge on capability: Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, Windscribe covers Firewall / default block.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Periscope Holdings and Windscribe actually diverge.
| Attribute | Periscope Holdings | Windscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | windows, mac, linux, ios, android, web |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Periscope Holdings
- Sealed bid solicitation
- Supplier registration network
- Contract catalogues
- Cooperative purchasing
- Spend and compliance reporting
- Supplier diversity tracking
Only in Windscribe
- Firewall / default block
- Unlimited simultaneous devices
- Build-A-Plan
- R.O.B.E.R.T. content blocker
- Static IP and port forwarding add-ons
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Periscope Holdings
- A state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entitiesnot Windscribe
- A large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening recordnot Windscribe
- A purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entitiesnot Windscribe
- A state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contractsnot Windscribe
Windscribe
- Running a free VPN across unlimited personal devicesnot Periscope Holdings
- Buying access to just a few specific server locations cheaplynot Periscope Holdings
- Blocking ads and trackers at the DNS level while browsingnot Periscope Holdings
- Preventing IP leaks with a default-block firewall rulenot Periscope Holdings
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Periscope Holdings
- It is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- The interface reflects the age and regulatory weight of the platform, and suppliers routinely describe registration and bidding as harder than on newer portals, which can suppress bid response.
- Ownership has changed twice since 2021, from independent to mdf commerce to KKR, so roadmap and support continuity should be written into the contract rather than assumed.
- Sibling products inside mdf commerce cover adjacent procurement ground, which means an apparently competitive shortlist may contain two products with the same owner.
- Statewide implementations are multi year projects with heavy configuration and change management, and the professional services cost commonly exceeds the software over the contract term.
Windscribe
- Free tier's 10GB cap still requires email confirmation and social sharing to unlock, unlike some no-strings-attached competitors.
- Build-A-Plan's low cost only covers selected locations, so broad global coverage still requires the full Pro plan.
- Server speeds and streaming reliability are inconsistent compared to larger premium VPN providers.
- Customer support is primarily ticket/community-based rather than live chat for lower tiers.
Pricing, plan by plan
Periscope Holdings
On request- BuySpeed$undefined/year
- Quoted per programme, scaled to entities served and transaction volume
- Multi year statewide contracts with implementation priced separately
- Supplier side registration fees form part of the commercial model on some programmes
Windscribe
Free- FreeFree
- 10GB of data per month with confirmed email
- 10 server countries
- Unlimited devices
- Build-A-Plan$3/month
- Pay per selected server location ($1/location)
- $3 minimum purchase
- Unlimited data on selected locations
- Pro$9/month
- Unlimited data
- 69+ countries
- $69/year on annual billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Periscope Holdings if
- You need sealed bid solicitation.
- You also want supplier registration network.
Choose Windscribe if
- You need firewall / default block.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on windows, mac, linux, ios, android, web.
- You also want unlimited simultaneous devices.
Questions people ask
- Is Periscope Holdings or Windscribe better?
- Neither clearly leads. Periscope Holdings starts at On request and Windscribe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Periscope Holdings or Windscribe?
- Windscribe has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Periscope Holdings and Free for Windscribe.
- Does Periscope Holdings or Windscribe run on more platforms?
- Periscope Holdings runs on Web. Windscribe runs on windows, mac, linux, ios, android, web.
- Can I use Windscribe for free?
- Yes. Windscribe has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Periscope Holdings starts at On request.
- What is Periscope Holdings best used for?
- Periscope Holdings is most often used for a state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entities, a large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening record, a purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entities, a state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contracts. Of those, a state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entities and a large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening record are not what Windscribe is typically brought in for.
- What can Periscope Holdings do that Windscribe cannot?
- Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, Supplier registration network, Contract catalogues, Cooperative purchasing. Windscribe covers Firewall / default block, Unlimited simultaneous devices, Build-A-Plan, R.O.B.E.R.T. content blocker.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Periscope Holdings: Who owns Periscope Holdings?
mdf commerce acquired it in 2021, and mdf commerce was itself acquired by KKR in 2024.
Periscope Holdings: Is it suitable for a single city?
Usually not. It is built and priced for statewide or very large agency programmes.
Periscope Holdings: What is BuySpeed?
The e-procurement platform behind its statewide deployments, covering solicitation through catalogue ordering and reporting.
Periscope Holdings: Can we see what a state paid?
Yes. State procurement awards are public records and typically disclose the full multi year contract value.
Related pages
More on Periscope Holdings
Other head to heads
- Periscope Holdings vs Euna Solutions
- Periscope Holdings vs Bidnet Direct
- Periscope Holdings vs OpenGov
- Periscope Holdings vs Bonfire
- Periscope Holdings vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Periscope Holdings vs NEOGOV
- Periscope Holdings vs ArchiveSocial
- Periscope Holdings vs Clariti
- Periscope Holdings vs GovPilot
- Periscope Holdings vs mySidewalk
- Periscope Holdings vs SAP for Government
- Periscope Holdings vs Axon Records
- Periscope Holdings vs CitizenLab
- Periscope Holdings vs ClearGov
- Periscope Holdings vs eCode360
- Periscope Holdings vs MyRec.com
- Periscope Holdings vs DemandStar
- Periscope Holdings vs TunnelBear
- Periscope Holdings vs Private Internet Access
- Periscope Holdings vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Periscope Holdings vs Surfshark
- Periscope Holdings vs Mullvad VPN
- Periscope Holdings vs Avast One
- Periscope Holdings vs CyberGhost VPN
- Periscope Holdings vs IVPN
- Periscope Holdings vs NordVPN
- Periscope Holdings vs ProtonVPN
- Periscope Holdings vs Osano
- Periscope Holdings vs Syft
- Periscope Holdings vs ThetaRay
- Periscope Holdings vs Trivy
- Periscope Holdings vs Trulioo
- Periscope Holdings vs Unit21
- Periscope Holdings vs Veracode
- Periscope Holdings vs ExpressVPN
- Windscribe vs Euna Solutions
- Windscribe vs Bidnet Direct
- Windscribe vs OpenGov
- Windscribe vs Bonfire
- Windscribe vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Windscribe vs NEOGOV
- Windscribe vs ArchiveSocial
- Windscribe vs Clariti
- Windscribe vs GovPilot
- Windscribe vs mySidewalk
- Windscribe vs SAP for Government
- Windscribe vs Axon Records
- Windscribe vs CitizenLab
- Windscribe vs ClearGov
- Windscribe vs eCode360
- Windscribe vs MyRec.com
- Windscribe vs DemandStar
- Windscribe vs TunnelBear
- Windscribe vs Private Internet Access
- Windscribe vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Windscribe vs Surfshark
- Windscribe vs Mullvad VPN
- Windscribe vs Avast One
- Windscribe vs CyberGhost VPN
- Windscribe vs IVPN
- Windscribe vs NordVPN
- Windscribe vs ProtonVPN
- Windscribe vs Osano
- Windscribe vs Syft
- Windscribe vs ThetaRay
- Windscribe vs Trivy
- Windscribe vs Trulioo
- Windscribe vs Unit21
- Windscribe vs Veracode
- Windscribe vs ExpressVPN
