Government · head to head
Periscope Holdings vs TunnelBear

Periscope Holdings
Government
Statewide e-procurement systems and supplier networks for large public agencies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
TunnelBear
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN with a limited free tier and a bear-themed, beginner-friendly app
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only TunnelBear has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Periscope Holdings it is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.; TunnelBear free plan's data cap is small compared to competitors offering more generous free allowances.
- They diverge on capability: Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, TunnelBear covers Encrypted VPN tunnel.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Periscope Holdings and TunnelBear actually diverge.
| Attribute | Periscope Holdings | TunnelBear |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | windows, mac, linux, ios, android |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Periscope Holdings
- Sealed bid solicitation
- Supplier registration network
- Contract catalogues
- Cooperative purchasing
- Spend and compliance reporting
- Supplier diversity tracking
Only in TunnelBear
- Encrypted VPN tunnel
- Server location switching
- GhostBear obfuscation
- Browser extensions
- Teams account management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Periscope Holdings
- A state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entitiesnot TunnelBear
- A large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening recordnot TunnelBear
- A purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entitiesnot TunnelBear
- A state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contractsnot TunnelBear
TunnelBear
- Casual browsing protection on public Wi-Finot Periscope Holdings
- Occasional geo-unblocking with a light free allowancenot Periscope Holdings
- Bypassing network-level VPN blocking via obfuscationnot Periscope Holdings
- Managing VPN access for a small team with centralized billingnot Periscope Holdings
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Periscope Holdings
- It is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- The interface reflects the age and regulatory weight of the platform, and suppliers routinely describe registration and bidding as harder than on newer portals, which can suppress bid response.
- Ownership has changed twice since 2021, from independent to mdf commerce to KKR, so roadmap and support continuity should be written into the contract rather than assumed.
- Sibling products inside mdf commerce cover adjacent procurement ground, which means an apparently competitive shortlist may contain two products with the same owner.
- Statewide implementations are multi year projects with heavy configuration and change management, and the professional services cost commonly exceeds the software over the contract term.
TunnelBear
- Free plan's data cap is small compared to competitors offering more generous free allowances.
- Lacks advanced features like dedicated IP addresses or split-tunneling controls found in some rival VPNs.
- Server network is smaller than large competitors like NordVPN or ExpressVPN.
- No standalone router-level app, limiting whole-network protection options.
Pricing, plan by plan
Periscope Holdings
On request- BuySpeed$undefined/year
- Quoted per programme, scaled to entities served and transaction volume
- Multi year statewide contracts with implementation priced separately
- Supplier side registration fees form part of the commercial model on some programmes
TunnelBear
Free- FreeFree
- 2GB of data per month
- Access to VPN servers
- Unlimited devices
- Unlimited$9.99/month
- Unlimited monthly data
- All server locations
- Cheaper on annual/3-year billing
- Teams$undefined/month
- Unlimited data
- 5 connected devices per user
- Dedicated account manager
Which should you pick?
Choose Periscope Holdings if
- You need sealed bid solicitation.
- You also want supplier registration network.
Choose TunnelBear if
- You need encrypted vpn tunnel.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- You also want server location switching.
Questions people ask
- Is Periscope Holdings or TunnelBear better?
- Neither clearly leads. Periscope Holdings starts at On request and TunnelBear at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Periscope Holdings or TunnelBear?
- TunnelBear has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Periscope Holdings and Free for TunnelBear.
- Does Periscope Holdings or TunnelBear run on more platforms?
- Periscope Holdings runs on Web. TunnelBear runs on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- Can I use TunnelBear for free?
- Yes. TunnelBear has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Periscope Holdings starts at On request.
- What is Periscope Holdings best used for?
- Periscope Holdings is most often used for a state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entities, a large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening record, a purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entities, a state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contracts. Of those, a state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entities and a large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening record are not what TunnelBear is typically brought in for.
- What can Periscope Holdings do that TunnelBear cannot?
- Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, Supplier registration network, Contract catalogues, Cooperative purchasing. TunnelBear covers Encrypted VPN tunnel, Server location switching, GhostBear obfuscation, Browser extensions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Periscope Holdings: Who owns Periscope Holdings?
mdf commerce acquired it in 2021, and mdf commerce was itself acquired by KKR in 2024.
Periscope Holdings: Is it suitable for a single city?
Usually not. It is built and priced for statewide or very large agency programmes.
Periscope Holdings: What is BuySpeed?
The e-procurement platform behind its statewide deployments, covering solicitation through catalogue ordering and reporting.
Periscope Holdings: Can we see what a state paid?
Yes. State procurement awards are public records and typically disclose the full multi year contract value.
Related pages
More on Periscope Holdings
Other head to heads
- Periscope Holdings vs Euna Solutions
- Periscope Holdings vs Bidnet Direct
- Periscope Holdings vs OpenGov
- Periscope Holdings vs Bonfire
- Periscope Holdings vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Periscope Holdings vs NEOGOV
- Periscope Holdings vs ArchiveSocial
- Periscope Holdings vs Clariti
- Periscope Holdings vs GovPilot
- Periscope Holdings vs mySidewalk
- Periscope Holdings vs SAP for Government
- Periscope Holdings vs Axon Records
- Periscope Holdings vs CitizenLab
- Periscope Holdings vs ClearGov
- Periscope Holdings vs eCode360
- Periscope Holdings vs MyRec.com
- Periscope Holdings vs DemandStar
- Periscope Holdings vs Windscribe
- Periscope Holdings vs Mullvad VPN
- Periscope Holdings vs Private Internet Access
- Periscope Holdings vs IVPN
- Periscope Holdings vs Enpass
- Periscope Holdings vs CyberGhost VPN
- Periscope Holdings vs NordVPN
- Periscope Holdings vs Surfshark
- Periscope Holdings vs Avast One
- Periscope Holdings vs ProtonVPN
- Periscope Holdings vs LastPass
- Periscope Holdings vs Jamf Pro
- Periscope Holdings vs Keeper Password Manager
- Periscope Holdings vs Keygen
- Periscope Holdings vs KnowBe4
- Periscope Holdings vs Legit Security
- Periscope Holdings vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Periscope Holdings vs ExpressVPN
- TunnelBear vs Euna Solutions
- TunnelBear vs Bidnet Direct
- TunnelBear vs OpenGov
- TunnelBear vs Bonfire
- TunnelBear vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- TunnelBear vs NEOGOV
- TunnelBear vs ArchiveSocial
- TunnelBear vs Clariti
- TunnelBear vs GovPilot
- TunnelBear vs mySidewalk
- TunnelBear vs SAP for Government
- TunnelBear vs Axon Records
- TunnelBear vs CitizenLab
- TunnelBear vs ClearGov
- TunnelBear vs eCode360
- TunnelBear vs MyRec.com
- TunnelBear vs DemandStar
- TunnelBear vs Windscribe
- TunnelBear vs Mullvad VPN
- TunnelBear vs Private Internet Access
- TunnelBear vs IVPN
- TunnelBear vs Enpass
- TunnelBear vs CyberGhost VPN
- TunnelBear vs NordVPN
- TunnelBear vs Surfshark
- TunnelBear vs Avast One
- TunnelBear vs ProtonVPN
- TunnelBear vs LastPass
- TunnelBear vs Jamf Pro
- TunnelBear vs Keeper Password Manager
- TunnelBear vs Keygen
- TunnelBear vs KnowBe4
- TunnelBear vs Legit Security
- TunnelBear vs LogRhythm SIEM
- TunnelBear vs ExpressVPN
