Cybersecurity · head to head
CyberGhost VPN vs eCode360
CyberGhost VPN
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN operated from Romania and owned by Kape Technologies, with a no-logs claim audited by Deloitte.
- From
- $2.19/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CyberGhost VPN kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.; eCode360 eCode360's own vendor site now redirects to ICC Code Solutions, stating eCode360 is now part of ICC Innovation, indicating General Code has been absorbed into ICC rather than operating as an independent vendor
- They diverge on capability: CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers, eCode360 covers Online Code Publishing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CyberGhost VPN and eCode360 actually diverge.
| Attribute | CyberGhost VPN | eCode360 |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2.19/month | $175/month |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Mobile | Web, Ios, Android |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | 2011 | 1960 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CyberGhost VPN
- NoSpy servers
- Audited no-logs policy
- WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2
- Streaming-labelled servers
- Dedicated IP via token
- Kill switch
- Split tunnelling
- Smart Rules
Only in eCode360
- Online Code Publishing
- Zoning Map Integration
- Advanced Search
- Code Comparison
- Mobile Responsive
- ArcGIS
- Zoning Software
- Document Systems
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CyberGhost VPN
- A household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public Wi-Finot eCode360
- A buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the Fourteen Eyes with a published third-party no-logs auditnot eCode360
- Torrenting on a connection where the internet provider throttles or logs peer-to-peer trafficnot eCode360
- Travellers needing to reach home-country services from abroad without configuring anything technicalnot eCode360
eCode360
- Citizen Servicesnot CyberGhost VPN
- Records Managementnot CyberGhost VPN
- Public Safetynot CyberGhost VPN
- Civic Engagementnot CyberGhost VPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CyberGhost VPN
- Kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.
- Pricing is structured so that the deep discount applies to the longest initial term and the standard rate applies at renewal, which means the figure used to make the decision is not the figure paid in year three unless the subscriber renegotiates or churns.
- The Deloitte engagement is point-in-time assurance over stated policy and server configuration, so it confirms things were as described when examined and says nothing about how the infrastructure behaves today or after an ownership change.
- Client capability differs sharply by platform: the Linux client is command-line only and lacks the kill switch and split tunnelling that the Windows client has, so a mixed-device household does not get the protection that reviews of the Windows app describe.
- Streaming-optimised server labels go stale because platforms block address ranges continually, and the practical support answer is to try a different server, which makes the labelled-server feature less dependable than the marketing implies.
eCode360
- eCode360's own vendor site now redirects to ICC Code Solutions, stating eCode360 is now part of ICC Innovation, indicating General Code has been absorbed into ICC rather than operating as an independent vendor
- ICC Code Solutions' own eCode360 page lists a Professional Subscription at $195 per year in USD for read access to the eCode library, separate from the municipal codification subscriptions sold to local governments
Pricing, plan by plan
CyberGhost VPN
$2.19/month- 1 Month$12.99/month
- 7 devices
- 9000+ servers
- Unlimited bandwidth
- 2 Years + 2 Months$2.19/month
- All features
- Best value
- 45-day guarantee
- 6 Months$6.99/month
- All features
- 45-day guarantee
eCode360
$175/month- eCode360$175/month
- Online Codes
- Zoning Integration
- Mobile Access
Which should you pick?
Choose CyberGhost VPN if
- You need nospy servers.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want audited no-logs policy.
Choose eCode360 if
- You need online code publishing.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want zoning map integration.
Questions people ask
- Is CyberGhost VPN or eCode360 better?
- Neither clearly leads. CyberGhost VPN starts at $2.19/month and eCode360 at $175/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CyberGhost VPN or eCode360?
- CyberGhost VPN starts at $2.19/month and eCode360 at $175/month.
- Does CyberGhost VPN or eCode360 run on more platforms?
- CyberGhost VPN runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile. eCode360 runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- What is CyberGhost VPN best used for?
- CyberGhost VPN is most often used for a household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public wi-fi, a buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the fourteen eyes with a published third-party no-logs audit, torrenting on a connection where the internet provider throttles or logs peer-to-peer traffic, travellers needing to reach home-country services from abroad without configuring anything technical. Of those, a household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public wi-fi and a buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the fourteen eyes with a published third-party no-logs audit are not what eCode360 is typically brought in for.
- What can CyberGhost VPN do that eCode360 cannot?
- CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers, Audited no-logs policy, WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2, Streaming-labelled servers. eCode360 covers Online Code Publishing, Zoning Map Integration, Advanced Search, Code Comparison.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CyberGhost VPN: Who owns CyberGhost?
Kape Technologies, which acquired it in 2017. Kape was formerly called Crossrider and also owns ExpressVPN, Private Internet Access and Zenmate, plus the review sites vpnMentor and Wizcase.
CyberGhost VPN: Has the no-logs claim been independently audited?
Yes. Deloitte has examined the no-logs policy and server configuration and published an assurance report. Note that this is a point-in-time engagement, not continuous monitoring.
CyberGhost VPN: What jurisdiction is it under?
The service is operated from Romania, which has no mandatory communications data retention law in force and is not a member of the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes intelligence-sharing arrangements. Ownership sits with Kape, headquartered in the UK.
CyberGhost VPN: Does it work with streaming services?
Often, using the servers labelled for each service, but this changes constantly as platforms block address ranges. Treat streaming access as a feature that may stop working on any given day rather than a guarantee.
CyberGhost VPN: Can I use it on Linux or a router?
There is a command-line Linux client with fewer features than the desktop apps, and router use requires manual OpenVPN configuration rather than an official app.
Related pages
More on CyberGhost VPN
Other head to heads
- CyberGhost VPN vs Surfshark
- CyberGhost VPN vs Norton 360
- CyberGhost VPN vs 1Password
- CyberGhost VPN vs Bitdefender Total Security
- CyberGhost VPN vs LastPass
- CyberGhost VPN vs NordVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Private Internet Access
- CyberGhost VPN vs TunnelBear
- CyberGhost VPN vs Mullvad VPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Windscribe
- CyberGhost VPN vs Avast One
- CyberGhost VPN vs IVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sigstore
- CyberGhost VPN vs Speakeasy
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sysdig
- CyberGhost VPN vs Tenable
- CyberGhost VPN vs Trend Micro Vision One
- CyberGhost VPN vs Municode
- CyberGhost VPN vs Accela
- CyberGhost VPN vs CivicPlus
- CyberGhost VPN vs Granicus
- CyberGhost VPN vs DocuWare
- CyberGhost VPN vs American Legal Publishing
- CyberGhost VPN vs GovPilot
- CyberGhost VPN vs OpenCities
- CyberGhost VPN vs Bidnet Direct
- CyberGhost VPN vs Polco
- CyberGhost VPN vs Socrata
- CyberGhost VPN vs CKAN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Clariti
- CyberGhost VPN vs DataSF
- CyberGhost VPN vs Google Cloud for Government
- CyberGhost VPN vs Legistar
- CyberGhost VPN vs GovQA
- eCode360 vs Surfshark
- eCode360 vs Norton 360
- eCode360 vs 1Password
- eCode360 vs Bitdefender Total Security
- eCode360 vs LastPass
- eCode360 vs NordVPN
- eCode360 vs Private Internet Access
- eCode360 vs TunnelBear
- eCode360 vs Mullvad VPN
- eCode360 vs Windscribe
- eCode360 vs Avast One
- eCode360 vs IVPN
- eCode360 vs Sigstore
- eCode360 vs Speakeasy
- eCode360 vs Sysdig
- eCode360 vs Tenable
- eCode360 vs Trend Micro Vision One
- eCode360 vs Municode
- eCode360 vs Accela
- eCode360 vs CivicPlus
- eCode360 vs Granicus
- eCode360 vs DocuWare
- eCode360 vs American Legal Publishing
- eCode360 vs GovPilot
- eCode360 vs OpenCities
- eCode360 vs Bidnet Direct
- eCode360 vs Polco
- eCode360 vs Socrata
- eCode360 vs CKAN
- eCode360 vs Clariti
- eCode360 vs DataSF
- eCode360 vs Google Cloud for Government
- eCode360 vs Legistar
- eCode360 vs GovQA

