Energy · head to head
Bently Nevada System 1 vs ETAP

Bently Nevada System 1
Energy
Machinery condition monitoring software for critical rotating equipment protected by Bently Nevada hardware
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

ETAP
Energy
Electrical power system design and analysis software
- From
- $5000/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bently Nevada System 1 system 1 assumes Bently Nevada hardware; connected to third-party protection systems it loses access to the dynamic and transient data that is the entire reason to buy it, so the software choice is really made when the racks are specified.; ETAP no pricing is published, and reaching a figure requires completing a multi step quote form
- They diverge on capability: Bently Nevada System 1 covers Turbomachinery plot set, ETAP covers Load flow analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bently Nevada System 1 and ETAP actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bently Nevada System 1 | ETAP |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $5000/year |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Windows, Web, On-premise | Windows, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 1986 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bently Nevada System 1
- Turbomachinery plot set
- Transient capture
- 3500 and Orbit 60 integration
- Decision support
- Data diode support
- Process data correlation
Only in ETAP
- Load flow analysis
- Short circuit analysis
- Arc flash analysis
- Protective device coordination
- Harmonics analysis
- Transient stability
- Cable sizing
- Panel schedule design
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bently Nevada System 1
- A refinery with API 670 protected compressor trains needing transient startup data captured and analysed, which general vibration platforms cannot donot ETAP
- An LNG plant where a single unplanned compressor trip costs more than the entire monitoring programmenot ETAP
- A power station correlating turbine vibration with process conditions to distinguish a real fault from a load-related responsenot ETAP
- An offshore operator using remote diagnostics because there is no rotating machinery specialist on the installationnot ETAP
ETAP
- Electrical power system modelling, simulation and analysisnot Bently Nevada System 1
- Arc flash, load flow and protection coordination studiesnot Bently Nevada System 1
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bently Nevada System 1
- System 1 assumes Bently Nevada hardware; connected to third-party protection systems it loses access to the dynamic and transient data that is the entire reason to buy it, so the software choice is really made when the racks are specified.
- It is priced by machine train, which makes it appropriate for a dozen critical machines and prohibitively expensive as a plant-wide condition monitoring system for balance-of-plant equipment.
- Reading the output well needs a rotating machinery specialist; orbit and shaft centreline plots are not self-explanatory, and a site without that skill will either buy the Baker Hughes remote monitoring service or under-use the software.
- The annual support and upgrade contract is a continuing cost that must be maintained to stay on supported versions, and lapsing it on a system tied to safety-relevant protection hardware is not a realistic saving.
- Nothing about pricing is published and the product is sold as part of a machinery relationship with Baker Hughes, so competitive tension at renewal is limited once the hardware is installed.
ETAP
- No pricing is published, and reaching a figure requires completing a multi step quote form
- Subscription durations offered are 3 years and 5 years, so there is no short commitment option
- Licences are banded by user count rather than sold individually, in brackets of 1, 5 to 15, 15 to 25, 25 to 50 and over 50
- National and international network licences are priced separately
Pricing, plan by plan
Bently Nevada System 1
On request- System 1$undefined/year
- Priced by machine train and connected data source
- Bently Nevada protection hardware assumed or purchased alongside
- Annual software support and upgrade contract sold separately
ETAP
$5000/year- Standard$5000/year
- Load flow analysis
- Short circuit analysis
- Arc flash analysis
- Professional$15000/year
- Advanced analysis
- Protective device coordination
- Harmonics analysis
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Real-time monitoring
- SCADA integration
- Custom modules
Which should you pick?
Choose Bently Nevada System 1 if
- You need turbomachinery plot set.
- You work on Windows, Web, On-premise.
- You also want transient capture.
Choose ETAP if
- You need load flow analysis.
- You work on Windows, Api.
- You also want short circuit analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Bently Nevada System 1 or ETAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bently Nevada System 1 starts at On request and ETAP at $5000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bently Nevada System 1 or ETAP?
- Bently Nevada System 1 starts at On request and ETAP at $5000/year.
- Does Bently Nevada System 1 or ETAP run on more platforms?
- Bently Nevada System 1 runs on Windows, Web, On-premise. ETAP runs on Windows, Api.
- What is Bently Nevada System 1 best used for?
- Bently Nevada System 1 is most often used for a refinery with api 670 protected compressor trains needing transient startup data captured and analysed, which general vibration platforms cannot do, an lng plant where a single unplanned compressor trip costs more than the entire monitoring programme, a power station correlating turbine vibration with process conditions to distinguish a real fault from a load-related response, an offshore operator using remote diagnostics because there is no rotating machinery specialist on the installation. Of those, a refinery with api 670 protected compressor trains needing transient startup data captured and analysed, which general vibration platforms cannot do and an lng plant where a single unplanned compressor trip costs more than the entire monitoring programme are not what ETAP is typically brought in for.
- What can Bently Nevada System 1 do that ETAP cannot?
- Bently Nevada System 1 covers Turbomachinery plot set, Transient capture, 3500 and Orbit 60 integration, Decision support. ETAP covers Load flow analysis, Short circuit analysis, Arc flash analysis, Protective device coordination.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bently Nevada System 1: Do I need Bently Nevada hardware?
Practically, yes. System 1 can take some third-party inputs but the dynamic and transient data that justify it come from 3500 or Orbit 60 racks.
ETAP: How is ETAP priced?
ETAP uses subscription-based pricing with tiered bundles (Launch, Grow, Scale) and optional add-ons. Specific prices are not published and require completing a quote request form.
SourceBently Nevada System 1: Is System 1 suitable for all my plant motors?
No. It is priced and designed for critical machine trains. Balance-of-plant motors are far better served by a general condition monitoring platform.
ETAP: What products does ETAP offer pricing for?
ETAP offers three main product lines with tiered bundles: CANECO (Electrical Design), ETAP (Power Systems Analysis), and SEE Electrical (Electrical Engineering). Each supports 1-50+ users with 3-5 year term options.
SourceBently Nevada System 1: What does Orbit 60 add?
A newer protection platform with SIL certification and a built-in data diode, which removes the network security objection to connecting protection systems.
Bently Nevada System 1: Can Baker Hughes monitor the machines for me?
Yes, remote machinery diagnostic services are offered, which is how many sites without an in-house specialist actually consume System 1.
Related pages
More on Bently Nevada System 1
Other head to heads
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs AVEVA PI System
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Novity
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Enphase Enlighten
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs ABB Ability
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Cognite Data Fusion
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs SolarWinds
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Emerson Ovation
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Enerex
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs SMA Energy
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs SunPower Monitoring
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs EnergyCAP
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Fluence Energy Management
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs GE Digital GridOS
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Itron
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Aurora Solar
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs HOMER Energy
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Azelio Energy Storage
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Siemens Spectrum Power
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs GE Digital Grid Software
- Bently Nevada System 1 vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- ETAP vs AVEVA PI System
- ETAP vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- ETAP vs Novity
- ETAP vs Enphase Enlighten
- ETAP vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- ETAP vs ABB Ability
- ETAP vs Cognite Data Fusion
- ETAP vs SolarWinds
- ETAP vs Emerson Ovation
- ETAP vs Enerex
- ETAP vs SMA Energy
- ETAP vs SunPower Monitoring
- ETAP vs EnergyCAP
- ETAP vs Fluence Energy Management
- ETAP vs GE Digital GridOS
- ETAP vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- ETAP vs Itron
- ETAP vs Aurora Solar
- ETAP vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- ETAP vs HOMER Energy
- ETAP vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- ETAP vs Azelio Energy Storage
- ETAP vs Proxibel Grid Suite
- ETAP vs Siemens Spectrum Power
- ETAP vs GE Digital Grid Software
- ETAP vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
