Agriculture · head to head
Cropin vs GAMAYA

Cropin
Agriculture
Agri-intelligence platform for organisations running programmes across thousands of smallholder farms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

GAMAYA
Agriculture
Sugarcane and vineyard agronomic intelligence from satellite imagery and crop models
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cropin data quality depends on field agents entering records honestly and consistently, so an organisation without an existing extension network has to build one before the software returns anything useful.; GAMAYA the product is now effectively sugarcane specific, so growers of anything other than cane or grapes will find little of the original broad crop coverage left.
- They diverge on capability: Cropin covers Plot digitisation, GAMAYA covers CanaSight.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cropin and GAMAYA actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cropin
- Plot digitisation
- Field agent mobile app
- Yield prediction
- Traceability
- Farmer advisory
- Risk scoring
- Data hub
- Programme reporting
Only in GAMAYA
- CanaSight
- CanaTrace
- AquaView
- Yield forecasting
- Vineyard analytics
- Mill-scale reporting
Both cover
- Satellite crop monitoring
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cropin
- A food company that must demonstrate where a crop was grown and under what practices, across thousands of contract growersnot GAMAYA
- A bank or insurer that needs an independent view of yield and risk before lending against a harvestnot GAMAYA
- A development programme reporting outcomes to a donor across multiple countries and cropsnot GAMAYA
- A seed or input business tracking demonstration plots and field trial performance at scalenot GAMAYA
GAMAYA
- A Brazilian sugarcane mill maximising certified CBIOs per hectare under RenovaBionot Cropin
- A large cane estate forecasting sugar content to sequence harvest blocks correctlynot Cropin
- An irrigated cane operation in southern Africa targeting water where the crop is actually stressednot Cropin
- A wine group monitoring vineyard blocks across multiple estates from one interfacenot Cropin
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cropin
- Data quality depends on field agents entering records honestly and consistently, so an organisation without an existing extension network has to build one before the software returns anything useful.
- Satellite-derived yield and health estimates degrade on small fragmented plots and during monsoon cloud cover, which is precisely where much of the customer base operates.
- It is not a tool for running a single farm, so an individual grower or estate evaluating it will find an enterprise programme platform with no meaningful single-farm workflow.
- Contracts are typically project shaped and tied to programme or donor funding, so the software can be switched off when a funding round ends rather than renewed on its merits.
- There is no equipment telemetry or machinery integration of consequence, so any customer that also runs a mechanised operation needs a second platform for that side of the business.
GAMAYA
- The product is now effectively sugarcane specific, so growers of anything other than cane or grapes will find little of the original broad crop coverage left.
- The 2024 merger with Terraview means the company, product line and roadmap differ substantially from the Gamaya that raised money as a hyperspectral imaging startup, and older references describe a business that no longer exists.
- Much of the commercial value is tied to Brazil's RenovaBio scheme, so a change in CBIO prices or programme rules would cut the return calculation directly and is entirely outside the vendor's control.
- No pricing is published at any tier, and with an enterprise sales motion aimed at mills, a single grower has little chance of a fast or cheap engagement.
- As a small European company selling into Brazil, India and southern Africa, local support depth and language coverage are stretched, and implementation depends on partners rather than the vendor.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cropin
On request- Cropin Cloud$undefined/year
- Quoted per programme, by grower count and geography
- Field agent licences and implementation services quoted separately
- Satellite and imagery layers often priced by area monitored
GAMAYA
On request- GAMAYA$undefined/year
- Quoted by hectares under management
- Product selection between CanaSight, CanaTrace and AquaView
- Enterprise agreements with mills and large estates
Which should you pick?
Choose Cropin if
- You need plot digitisation.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want field agent mobile app.
Questions people ask
- Is Cropin or GAMAYA better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cropin starts at On request and GAMAYA at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cropin or GAMAYA?
- Cropin starts at On request and GAMAYA at On request.
- Does Cropin or GAMAYA run on more platforms?
- Cropin runs on Web, iOS, Android. GAMAYA runs on Web.
- What is Cropin best used for?
- Cropin is most often used for a food company that must demonstrate where a crop was grown and under what practices, across thousands of contract growers, a bank or insurer that needs an independent view of yield and risk before lending against a harvest, a development programme reporting outcomes to a donor across multiple countries and crops, a seed or input business tracking demonstration plots and field trial performance at scale. Of those, a food company that must demonstrate where a crop was grown and under what practices, across thousands of contract growers and a bank or insurer that needs an independent view of yield and risk before lending against a harvest are not what GAMAYA is typically brought in for.
- What can Cropin do that GAMAYA cannot?
- Cropin covers Plot digitisation, Field agent mobile app, Yield prediction, Traceability. GAMAYA covers CanaSight, CanaTrace, AquaView, Yield forecasting. Both handle Satellite crop monitoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cropin: Can an individual farm buy Cropin?
In practice no. It is sold to organisations managing many growers, and the pricing and implementation model assume programme scale.
GAMAYA: Is Gamaya still in business?
Yes. Gamaya merged with Terraview in July 2024 and the combined company trades as GAMAYA from Winterthur, Switzerland.
Cropin: Does it need field staff on the ground?
Yes for most deployments. Satellite layers supplement agent-collected data, they do not replace it.
GAMAYA: What crops does it cover?
Sugarcane primarily, with grapes from the Terraview side. The broad multi-crop hyperspectral ambition of the earlier company is gone.
Cropin: Which regions is it strongest in?
India, South East Asia and Africa, where smallholder programmes are the dominant structure. Coverage in North America and Europe exists but the reference base is thinner.
GAMAYA: What is CanaTrace for?
Streamlining RenovaBio certification in Brazil, where increased certified CBIOs per hectare have a directly monetisable value.
Cropin: Is pricing published?
No. Everything is quoted by grower count, geography and the modules taken.
GAMAYA: What does it cost?
Nothing is published. It is quoted by hectares under management and sold mainly to mills and large estates.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cropin vs Cropio
- Cropin vs Agworld
- Cropin vs FarmERP
- Cropin vs Datamars Livestock
- Cropin vs CeresAI
- Cropin vs Bushel
- Cropin vs CropTracker Pro
- Cropin vs Proagrica
- Cropin vs Produce Pro
- Cropin vs Nedap Livestock Management
- Cropin vs fieldmargin
- Cropin vs Indigo Agriculture
- Cropin vs John Deere Operations Center
- Cropin vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Cropin vs OneSoil
- Cropin vs Pix4Dfields
- Cropin vs PrecisionHawk
- Cropin vs Taranis
- Cropin vs CropX
- Cropin vs Farmers Edge
- Cropin vs DTN Agriculture
- Cropin vs Case IH AFS Connect
- Cropin vs xarvio Digital Farming
- Cropin vs Granular
- Cropin vs DJI Agriculture
- Cropin vs FarmCommand
- Cropin vs Farmers Business Network (FBN)
- Cropin vs FarmWorks
- GAMAYA vs Cropio
- GAMAYA vs Agworld
- GAMAYA vs FarmERP
- GAMAYA vs Datamars Livestock
- GAMAYA vs CeresAI
- GAMAYA vs Bushel
- GAMAYA vs CropTracker Pro
- GAMAYA vs Proagrica
- GAMAYA vs Produce Pro
- GAMAYA vs Nedap Livestock Management
- GAMAYA vs fieldmargin
- GAMAYA vs Indigo Agriculture
- GAMAYA vs John Deere Operations Center
- GAMAYA vs Lindsay FieldNET
- GAMAYA vs OneSoil
- GAMAYA vs Pix4Dfields
- GAMAYA vs PrecisionHawk
- GAMAYA vs Taranis
- GAMAYA vs CropX
- GAMAYA vs Farmers Edge
- GAMAYA vs DTN Agriculture
- GAMAYA vs Case IH AFS Connect
- GAMAYA vs xarvio Digital Farming
- GAMAYA vs Granular
- GAMAYA vs DJI Agriculture
- GAMAYA vs FarmCommand
- GAMAYA vs Farmers Business Network (FBN)
- GAMAYA vs FarmWorks
