CAD · head to head
CoreTechnologie vs Mari

CoreTechnologie
CAD
CAD format conversion, validation and additive build preparation from a German independent
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Mari has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CoreTechnologie no pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.; Mari the full annual licence is $1,289 paid annually, and a short term quarterly rental is $949 per quarter
- They diverge on capability: CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion, Mari covers High-resolution painting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CoreTechnologie and Mari actually diverge.
| Attribute | CoreTechnologie | Mari |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Windows, MacOS, Linux |
| Founded | Unknown | 1996 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CoreTechnologie
- Native CAD conversion
- Automatic geometry healing
- Feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- Batch and server conversion
- 3D_Analyzer
- 4D_Additive B-rep printing
Only in Mari
- High-resolution painting
- UDIM support
- Procedural layers
- Baking
- Node graph
- Color management
- Maya
- Nuke
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CoreTechnologie
- A tier supplier that receives CATIA from one customer and NX from another and must work in SolidWorksnot Mari
- A company migrating a CAD library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solidsnot Mari
- Preparing additive builds from exact B-rep geometry where STL faceting would lose the tolerance you neednot Mari
- Giving purchasing and manufacturing staff a viewer with real analysis without buying them CAD seatsnot Mari
Mari
- Painting textures directly onto high complexity 3D assets for film and gamesnot CoreTechnologie
- Handling very large multi-UDIM texture sets in a look development pipelinenot CoreTechnologie
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CoreTechnologie
- No pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.
- Licensing is granular by format read and write pair, so the price you were quoted covers the translations you named and adding a customer with a different CAD platform later means going back for another line item.
- It is a small independent vendor, so a buyer standardising a critical migration pipeline on it should weigh the concentration risk and check the support arrangement in their own region rather than assume global coverage.
- Feature recognition on converted geometry works well on prismatic machined parts and much less well on complex freeform surfaces, so the rebuilt-as-editable claim needs testing on your own worst parts, not on a demo model.
- 4D_Additive competes with entrenched incumbents such as Magics in industrial AM, so machine-side Build Processor support and bureau familiarity are thinner, which matters if you need your service provider to accept the output.
Mari
- The full annual licence is $1,289 paid annually, and a short term quarterly rental is $949 per quarter
- The cheap $299 per year or $35 per month subscription is restricted to a single licence for people working alone or in small companies
- Node-locked and floating are separate licence types you must choose between
- All listed prices are before applicable taxes
- A separate non-commercial licence exists, so commercial use requires a paid tier
Pricing, plan by plan
CoreTechnologie
On request- 3D_Evolution$undefined/year
- Native CAD conversion across around 36 formats
- Automatic healing and feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- 3D_Analyzer$undefined/year
- Cross-format viewing and measurement
- Wall thickness, draft and collision analysis
- Model comparison
- 4D_Additive$undefined/year
- B-rep based build preparation
- Texturing, nesting and lattice structures
- Automatic part analysis for printability
Mari
Free- Individual Subscription$86/month
- Solo artists or small companies
- $689 per year alternative billing
- Team Subscription$null/year
- Node-locked or floating licenses
- Annual payment
- Team Rental$949/quarter
- Short-term access
- Node-locked or floating licenses
Which should you pick?
Choose CoreTechnologie if
- You need native cad conversion.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want automatic geometry healing.
Choose Mari if
- You need high-resolution painting.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want udim support.
Questions people ask
- Is CoreTechnologie or Mari better?
- Neither clearly leads. CoreTechnologie starts at On request and Mari at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CoreTechnologie or Mari?
- Mari has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for CoreTechnologie and Free for Mari.
- Does CoreTechnologie or Mari run on more platforms?
- CoreTechnologie runs on Windows, Linux. Mari runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- Can I use Mari for free?
- Yes. Mari has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CoreTechnologie starts at On request.
- What is CoreTechnologie best used for?
- CoreTechnologie is most often used for a tier supplier that receives catia from one customer and nx from another and must work in solidworks, a company migrating a cad library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solids, preparing additive builds from exact b-rep geometry where stl faceting would lose the tolerance you need, giving purchasing and manufacturing staff a viewer with real analysis without buying them cad seats. Of those, a tier supplier that receives catia from one customer and nx from another and must work in solidworks and a company migrating a cad library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solids are not what Mari is typically brought in for.
- What can CoreTechnologie do that Mari cannot?
- CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion, Automatic geometry healing, Feature recognition, Simplification and defeaturing. Mari covers High-resolution painting, UDIM support, Procedural layers, Baking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CoreTechnologie: Is CoreTechnologie owned by a CAD vendor?
No. It is an independent German company, which is the main reason it appears in supply chains that must move data between competing CAD platforms.
Mari: What is Mari's pricing?
Individual Subscription costs $689 per year or $86 per month. Team Subscription costs $1,289 per year. Team Rental costs $949 per quarter for short-term access. Both subscriptions support node-locked or floating licenses.
SourceCoreTechnologie: Does conversion produce editable models?
3D_Evolution has feature recognition that rebuilds parametric features from solids. It is reliable on prismatic machined geometry and weaker on complex freeform surfaces, so test it on your hardest parts.
Mari: Does Mari offer a free trial?
Mari offers a free 30-day trial with unrestricted access to help users evaluate the software before purchasing.
SourceCoreTechnologie: What makes 4D_Additive different from a normal slicer?
It prepares builds on exact B-rep geometry rather than converting to STL first, so tolerance and surface accuracy are not lost to faceting before printing.
Mari: Does Mari offer student pricing?
Yes, Mari offers free or discounted access to all Foundry products for students, as well as free non-commercial licenses for learning and exploration.
SourceCoreTechnologie: Can it run unattended for large migrations?
Yes. Batch and server conversion is designed for high-volume migration and PLM pipeline use rather than desk-by-desk conversion.
Related pages
More on CoreTechnologie
Other head to heads
- CoreTechnologie vs FreeCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Siemens NX
- CoreTechnologie vs CATIA
- CoreTechnologie vs nTop
- CoreTechnologie vs ANSYS Fluent
- CoreTechnologie vs Bambu Studio
- CoreTechnologie vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- CoreTechnologie vs MicroSurvey CAD
- CoreTechnologie vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley MicroStation
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- CoreTechnologie vs BricsCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Arnold
- CoreTechnologie vs Carlson Software
- CoreTechnologie vs Corona Renderer
- CoreTechnologie vs Inventor
- CoreTechnologie vs Mudbox
- CoreTechnologie vs V-Ray
- CoreTechnologie vs Enscape
- CoreTechnologie vs KeyShot
- CoreTechnologie vs LightWave 3D
- CoreTechnologie vs 3D-Coat
- CoreTechnologie vs Houdini
- CoreTechnologie vs PrusaSlicer
- CoreTechnologie vs Lumion
- CoreTechnologie vs DraftSight
- CoreTechnologie vs IronCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs KiCad
- CoreTechnologie vs Redshift
- Mari vs FreeCAD
- Mari vs Siemens NX
- Mari vs CATIA
- Mari vs nTop
- Mari vs ANSYS Fluent
- Mari vs Bambu Studio
- Mari vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- Mari vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Mari vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Mari vs Bentley MicroStation
- Mari vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Mari vs BricsCAD
- Mari vs Arnold
- Mari vs Carlson Software
- Mari vs Corona Renderer
- Mari vs Inventor
- Mari vs Mudbox
- Mari vs V-Ray
- Mari vs Enscape
- Mari vs KeyShot
- Mari vs LightWave 3D
- Mari vs 3D-Coat
- Mari vs Houdini
- Mari vs PrusaSlicer
- Mari vs Lumion
- Mari vs DraftSight
- Mari vs IronCAD
- Mari vs KiCad
- Mari vs Redshift

