CAD · head to head
CoreTechnologie vs Lumion

CoreTechnologie
CAD
CAD format conversion, validation and additive build preparation from a German independent
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CoreTechnologie no pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.; Lumion enterprise tier is priced by quote only, labelled Let's talk in the vendor's own pricing data, alongside otherwise self-serve tiers with published dollar and pound figures
- They diverge on capability: CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion, Lumion covers Real-time rendering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CoreTechnologie and Lumion actually diverge.
| Attribute | CoreTechnologie | Lumion |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $29/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Windows |
| Founded | Unknown | 1998 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CoreTechnologie
- Native CAD conversion
- Automatic geometry healing
- Feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- Batch and server conversion
- 3D_Analyzer
- 4D_Additive B-rep printing
Only in Lumion
- Real-time rendering
- Content library
- Effects
- Video animation
- VR export
- LiveSync
- Revit
- SketchUp
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CoreTechnologie
- A tier supplier that receives CATIA from one customer and NX from another and must work in SolidWorksnot Lumion
- A company migrating a CAD library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solidsnot Lumion
- Preparing additive builds from exact B-rep geometry where STL faceting would lose the tolerance you neednot Lumion
- Giving purchasing and manufacturing staff a viewer with real analysis without buying them CAD seatsnot Lumion
Lumion
- Architectural visualizationnot CoreTechnologie
- Client presentationsnot CoreTechnologie
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CoreTechnologie
- No pricing is published and the vendor sells through direct and regional channels, so there is no list price to anchor a negotiation and quotes differ by territory.
- Licensing is granular by format read and write pair, so the price you were quoted covers the translations you named and adding a customer with a different CAD platform later means going back for another line item.
- It is a small independent vendor, so a buyer standardising a critical migration pipeline on it should weigh the concentration risk and check the support arrangement in their own region rather than assume global coverage.
- Feature recognition on converted geometry works well on prismatic machined parts and much less well on complex freeform surfaces, so the rebuilt-as-editable claim needs testing on your own worst parts, not on a demo model.
- 4D_Additive competes with entrenched incumbents such as Magics in industrial AM, so machine-side Build Processor support and bureau familiarity are thinner, which matters if you need your service provider to accept the output.
Lumion
- Enterprise tier is priced by quote only, labelled Let's talk in the vendor's own pricing data, alongside otherwise self-serve tiers with published dollar and pound figures
Pricing, plan by plan
CoreTechnologie
On request- 3D_Evolution$undefined/year
- Native CAD conversion across around 36 formats
- Automatic healing and feature recognition
- Simplification and defeaturing
- 3D_Analyzer$undefined/year
- Cross-format viewing and measurement
- Wall thickness, draft and collision analysis
- Model comparison
- 4D_Additive$undefined/year
- B-rep based build preparation
- Texturing, nesting and lattice structures
- Automatic part analysis for printability
Lumion
$29/month- Standard$1499/month
- Core features
- Pro$2999/month
- Full features
- More content
Which should you pick?
Choose CoreTechnologie if
- You need native cad conversion.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want automatic geometry healing.
Choose Lumion if
- You need real-time rendering.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want content library.
Questions people ask
- Is CoreTechnologie or Lumion better?
- Neither clearly leads. CoreTechnologie starts at On request and Lumion at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CoreTechnologie or Lumion?
- CoreTechnologie starts at On request and Lumion at $29/month.
- Does CoreTechnologie or Lumion run on more platforms?
- CoreTechnologie runs on Windows, Linux. Lumion runs on Windows.
- What is CoreTechnologie best used for?
- CoreTechnologie is most often used for a tier supplier that receives catia from one customer and nx from another and must work in solidworks, a company migrating a cad library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solids, preparing additive builds from exact b-rep geometry where stl faceting would lose the tolerance you need, giving purchasing and manufacturing staff a viewer with real analysis without buying them cad seats. Of those, a tier supplier that receives catia from one customer and nx from another and must work in solidworks and a company migrating a cad library off one platform and needing feature-recognised, editable models rather than dumb solids are not what Lumion is typically brought in for.
- What can CoreTechnologie do that Lumion cannot?
- CoreTechnologie covers Native CAD conversion, Automatic geometry healing, Feature recognition, Simplification and defeaturing. Lumion covers Real-time rendering, Content library, Effects, Video animation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CoreTechnologie: Is CoreTechnologie owned by a CAD vendor?
No. It is an independent German company, which is the main reason it appears in supply chains that must move data between competing CAD platforms.
Lumion: Where can I find Lumion pricing information?
Specific pricing details are not published on Lumion's public website. Interested customers need to visit the full Lumion website or contact the sales team directly for quotes.
SourceCoreTechnologie: Does conversion produce editable models?
3D_Evolution has feature recognition that rebuilds parametric features from solids. It is reliable on prismatic machined geometry and weaker on complex freeform surfaces, so test it on your hardest parts.
Lumion: Does Lumion offer a free trial?
A free trial is available for Lumion, though the specific trial duration and included features are not detailed on the main website.
SourceCoreTechnologie: What makes 4D_Additive different from a normal slicer?
It prepares builds on exact B-rep geometry rather than converting to STL first, so tolerance and surface accuracy are not lost to faceting before printing.
Lumion: What is Lumion's licensing model?
Lumion is a commercial software product for architects and 3D rendering professionals. Licensing details and purchase options require contacting the sales team directly.
SourceCoreTechnologie: Can it run unattended for large migrations?
Yes. Batch and server conversion is designed for high-volume migration and PLM pipeline use rather than desk-by-desk conversion.
Related pages
More on CoreTechnologie
Other head to heads
- CoreTechnologie vs FreeCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Siemens NX
- CoreTechnologie vs CATIA
- CoreTechnologie vs nTop
- CoreTechnologie vs ANSYS Fluent
- CoreTechnologie vs Bambu Studio
- CoreTechnologie vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- CoreTechnologie vs MicroSurvey CAD
- CoreTechnologie vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley MicroStation
- CoreTechnologie vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- CoreTechnologie vs BricsCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Arnold
- CoreTechnologie vs Carlson Software
- CoreTechnologie vs Corona Renderer
- CoreTechnologie vs Inventor
- CoreTechnologie vs Mudbox
- CoreTechnologie vs Enscape
- CoreTechnologie vs KeyShot
- CoreTechnologie vs D5 Render
- CoreTechnologie vs V-Ray
- CoreTechnologie vs Twinmotion
- CoreTechnologie vs Vectorworks
- CoreTechnologie vs Redshift
- CoreTechnologie vs OnShape
- CoreTechnologie vs LightWave 3D
- CoreTechnologie vs OpenSCAD
- CoreTechnologie vs Plasticity
- CoreTechnologie vs 3D-Coat
- CoreTechnologie vs Alibre Design
- CoreTechnologie vs Altium 365
- Lumion vs FreeCAD
- Lumion vs Siemens NX
- Lumion vs CATIA
- Lumion vs nTop
- Lumion vs ANSYS Fluent
- Lumion vs Bambu Studio
- Lumion vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- Lumion vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Lumion vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Lumion vs Bentley MicroStation
- Lumion vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Lumion vs BricsCAD
- Lumion vs Arnold
- Lumion vs Carlson Software
- Lumion vs Corona Renderer
- Lumion vs Inventor
- Lumion vs Mudbox
- Lumion vs Enscape
- Lumion vs KeyShot
- Lumion vs D5 Render
- Lumion vs V-Ray
- Lumion vs Twinmotion
- Lumion vs Vectorworks
- Lumion vs Redshift
- Lumion vs OnShape
- Lumion vs LightWave 3D
- Lumion vs OpenSCAD
- Lumion vs Plasticity
- Lumion vs 3D-Coat
- Lumion vs Alibre Design
- Lumion vs Altium 365

