APIs · head to head
Convoy vs Thredd

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Thredd
APIs
Issuer processing platform for fintechs and digital banks, formerly Global Processing Services
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Convoy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; Thredd pricing is entirely unpublished, so cost comparison against competing processors requires a sales process.
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Thredd covers Issuer processing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and Thredd actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in Thredd
- Issuer processing
- Multi-country reach
- Scheme certification
- Programme support across verticals
- High platform availability
- Global office footprint
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot Thredd
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot Thredd
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot Thredd
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot Thredd
Thredd
- A digital bank or fintech needing issuer processing across many countries under one contractnot Convoy
- A BNPL, lending or crypto product needing certified card processing behind its own brandnot Convoy
- A company that finds outdated Global Processing Services (GPS) material and needs to confirm it is now Threddnot Convoy
- An embedded finance platform wanting a processor already integrated with core banking systems such as Mambunot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
Thredd
- Pricing is entirely unpublished, so cost comparison against competing processors requires a sales process.
- The 2023 rebrand from GPS to Thredd means research under either name alone can miss relevant material, and partner or press references before 2023 will still say GPS.
- Issuer processing does not include the banking licence itself, so a fintech still needs a separate BIN sponsor or bank partner, adding a second relationship to manage.
- As shared infrastructure behind many fintech brands, an outage or processing delay at Thredd becomes a simultaneous incident for every programme running on it, with limited visibility for any single customer into root cause.
- Its verticals span crypto, BNPL and remittance broadly, so depth of specialist support in any one vertical may be thinner than a processor focused narrowly on that niche.
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
Thredd
On request- Thredd$undefined/year
- Volume and programme-based pricing, not published
- Custom quote required via sales
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose Thredd if
- You need issuer processing.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want multi-country reach.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or Thredd better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and Thredd at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or Thredd?
- Convoy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Convoy and On request for Thredd.
- Does Convoy or Thredd run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Thredd runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Yes. Convoy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Thredd starts at On request.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what Thredd is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that Thredd cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. Thredd covers Issuer processing, Multi-country reach, Scheme certification, Programme support across verticals.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
Thredd: Is Thredd the same company as Global Processing Services?
Yes, GPS rebranded as Thredd in 2023; it is the same company and platform.
Convoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
Thredd: Does it hold the banking licence for programmes it processes?
No, Thredd is the issuer processor; a separate bank or BIN sponsor holds the actual issuing licence.
Convoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
Thredd: Is pricing published?
No, it requires a sales conversation.
Convoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs Lithic
- Convoy vs Tribe Payments
- Convoy vs Unit
- Convoy vs Highnote
- Convoy vs Marqeta
- Convoy vs Weavr
- Convoy vs Treasury Prime
- Convoy vs Synctera
- Convoy vs Paymentology
- Convoy vs Toqio
- Convoy vs Enfuce
- Convoy vs Yapily
- Convoy vs Stoplight
- Convoy vs Swan
- Convoy vs Temenos Transact
- Convoy vs Token.io
- Thredd vs Kong
- Thredd vs Svix
- Thredd vs Tyk
- Thredd vs Janus Gateway
- Thredd vs Appwrite
- Thredd vs Gravitee
- Thredd vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Thredd vs Formance
- Thredd vs AWS API Gateway
- Thredd vs Hasura
- Thredd vs PocketBase
- Thredd vs Sensedia
- Thredd vs Sila
- Thredd vs Swagger
- Thredd vs TIBCO Mashery
- Thredd vs Zeplo
- Thredd vs Kong Gateway
- Thredd vs Lithic
- Thredd vs Tribe Payments
- Thredd vs Unit
- Thredd vs Highnote
- Thredd vs Marqeta
- Thredd vs Weavr
- Thredd vs Treasury Prime
- Thredd vs Synctera
- Thredd vs Paymentology
- Thredd vs Toqio
- Thredd vs Enfuce
- Thredd vs Yapily
- Thredd vs Stoplight
- Thredd vs Swan
- Thredd vs Temenos Transact
- Thredd vs Token.io
