APIs · head to head
Convoy vs PubNub

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

PubNub
APIs
Realtime communication platform for chat, IoT, and live data apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; PubNub free plan storage history is limited to 7 days, which is short for apps needing longer message retention.
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, PubNub covers Pub/sub messaging.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and PubNub actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in PubNub
- Pub/sub messaging
- Presence tracking
- Message persistence
- Serverless Functions
- File sharing
- Encryption and access controls
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot PubNub
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot PubNub
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot PubNub
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot PubNub
PubNub
- Building realtime chat applicationsnot Convoy
- Streaming live IoT sensor datanot Convoy
- Adding presence indicators to collaborative appsnot Convoy
- Running edge logic with serverless Functions on realtime eventsnot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
PubNub
- Free plan storage history is limited to 7 days, which is short for apps needing longer message retention.
- MAU-based pricing means costs scale directly with user growth, which can be less predictable than flat message-based pricing.
- Pro-tier custom pricing above 50,000 MAU requires contacting sales rather than self-serve checkout.
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
PubNub
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 200 MAU or 1M transactions
- 1GB data storage (7 days)
- 5 test Serverless Functions
- Starter$98/month
- 1,000 MAU included
- User management
- Insights
- Pro$undefined/month
- Custom MAU packages
- Volume discounts
- Enterprise-scale configurations
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose PubNub if
- You need pub/sub messaging.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, ios, android, api.
- You also want presence tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or PubNub better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and PubNub at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or PubNub?
- Convoy starts at Free and PubNub at Free.
- Does Convoy or PubNub run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. PubNub runs on web, ios, android, api.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what PubNub is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that PubNub cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. PubNub covers Pub/sub messaging, Presence tracking, Message persistence, Serverless Functions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
PubNub: What does PubNub cost?
PubNub offers a free plan for up to 200 MAU or 1 million transactions, a Starter plan at $98/month for 1,000 MAU, and custom Pro pricing for larger volumes, e.g. around $550/month for 10,000 MAU.
SourceConvoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
PubNub: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes, the free plan supports up to 200 monthly active users or 1 million transactions, includes 1GB of data storage retained for 7 days, and requires no credit card.
SourceConvoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
PubNub: How is usage metered?
PubNub bills primarily by Monthly Active Users, defined as a unique user who connects at least once in a billing cycle; messages are bundled into MAU pricing with no separate per-message fees, and overage is billed proportionally.
SourceConvoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs Pusher
- Convoy vs Ably
- Convoy vs Liveblocks
- Convoy vs Apollo GraphQL
- Convoy vs Lithic
- Convoy vs Yapily
- Convoy vs Increase
- Convoy vs Token.io
- Convoy vs Episode Six
- Convoy vs Moov
- Convoy vs MX Technologies
- Convoy vs Bruno
- Convoy vs Bud Financial
- Convoy vs Marqeta
- Convoy vs Meniga
- PubNub vs Kong
- PubNub vs Svix
- PubNub vs Tyk
- PubNub vs Janus Gateway
- PubNub vs Appwrite
- PubNub vs Gravitee
- PubNub vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- PubNub vs Formance
- PubNub vs AWS API Gateway
- PubNub vs Hasura
- PubNub vs PocketBase
- PubNub vs Sensedia
- PubNub vs Sila
- PubNub vs Swagger
- PubNub vs TIBCO Mashery
- PubNub vs Zeplo
- PubNub vs Kong Gateway
- PubNub vs Pusher
- PubNub vs Ably
- PubNub vs Liveblocks
- PubNub vs Apollo GraphQL
- PubNub vs Lithic
- PubNub vs Yapily
- PubNub vs Increase
- PubNub vs Token.io
- PubNub vs Episode Six
- PubNub vs Moov
- PubNub vs MX Technologies
- PubNub vs Bruno
- PubNub vs Bud Financial
- PubNub vs Marqeta
- PubNub vs Meniga
