APIs · head to head
Convoy vs Nomad

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; Nomad nomad 1.7.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Nomad covers Container orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and Nomad actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in Nomad
- Container orchestration
- Job scheduling
- Multi-cloud support
- Auto-scaling
- Service discovery
- Rolling deployments
- Monitoring integration
- High availability
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot Nomad
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot Nomad
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot Nomad
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot Nomad
Nomad
- Container and workload orchestration across infrastructurenot Convoy
- Multi-region application deploymentnot Convoy
- Flexible scheduling for batch jobs and servicesnot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
Nomad
- Nomad 1.7.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Nomad to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions
- Each version converts to MPL 2.0 only four years after that version is published
- Resource quotas, Sentinel policies and audit logging sit in a Governance and Policy add-on module that is separate from the Enterprise base platform package
- Multi-region deployments, multiple Vault namespaces and Nomad Autopilot advanced server management require Nomad Enterprise
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
Nomad
Free- Open SourceFree
- Workload orchestration
- Multi-cloud
- Flexible scheduling
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose Nomad if
- You need container orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- You also want job scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or Nomad better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and Nomad at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or Nomad?
- Convoy starts at Free and Nomad at Free.
- Does Convoy or Nomad run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Nomad runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what Nomad is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that Nomad cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. Nomad covers Container orchestration, Job scheduling, Multi-cloud support, Auto-scaling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
Nomad: Is HashiCorp Nomad free?
HashiCorp Nomad is open source and free to use. Commercial enterprise support and hosting options may be available through HashiCorp, but the core product is free.
SourceConvoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
Nomad: Does HashiCorp Nomad have a pricing model?
Nomad is open source software with no published pricing tiers. HashiCorp offers commercial hosting and support for their products on a usage-based or custom pricing model, but Nomad itself is free to download and deploy.
SourceConvoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
Nomad: What is HashiCorp's pricing model for enterprise Nomad?
HashiCorp offers flexible pricing for enterprise Nomad support including pay-as-you-go (PAYG) billing with no long-term commitment, flex plans with preferred pricing, and enterprise self-managed plans. Contact HashiCorp sales for custom quotes.
SourceConvoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Convoy vs DigitalOcean
- Convoy vs Grafana Cloud
- Convoy vs Neon
- Convoy vs Microsoft Azure
- Convoy vs Crossplane
- Convoy vs Terragrunt
- Convoy vs Encore
- Convoy vs Zeabur
- Convoy vs Hetzner Cloud
- Convoy vs Linode
- Convoy vs Vultr
- Convoy vs Lambda
- Convoy vs Longhorn
- Convoy vs Northflank
- Convoy vs minikube
- Convoy vs OpenTelemetry
- Nomad vs Kong
- Nomad vs Svix
- Nomad vs Tyk
- Nomad vs Janus Gateway
- Nomad vs Appwrite
- Nomad vs Gravitee
- Nomad vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Nomad vs Formance
- Nomad vs AWS API Gateway
- Nomad vs Hasura
- Nomad vs PocketBase
- Nomad vs Sensedia
- Nomad vs Sila
- Nomad vs Swagger
- Nomad vs TIBCO Mashery
- Nomad vs Zeplo
- Nomad vs Kong Gateway
- Nomad vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Nomad vs DigitalOcean
- Nomad vs Grafana Cloud
- Nomad vs Neon
- Nomad vs Microsoft Azure
- Nomad vs Crossplane
- Nomad vs Terragrunt
- Nomad vs Encore
- Nomad vs Zeabur
- Nomad vs Hetzner Cloud
- Nomad vs Linode
- Nomad vs Vultr
- Nomad vs Lambda
- Nomad vs Longhorn
- Nomad vs Northflank
- Nomad vs minikube
- Nomad vs OpenTelemetry

