Databases · head to head
Convex vs TimescaleDB

Convex
Databases
Reactive backend combining a document database, TypeScript server functions and live queries, source-available under the Functional Source Licence.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

TimescaleDB
Databases
Time-series database built on PostgreSQL for real-time analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convex the Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.; TimescaleDB inherits PostgreSQL write path limitations, creating a ceiling on ingestion throughput
- They diverge on capability: Convex covers Reactive queries, TimescaleDB covers Time-series Optimization.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convex and TimescaleDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Convex | TimescaleDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure) |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convex
- Reactive queries
- TypeScript server functions
- ACID transactions
- Document database
- Scheduling and workflows
- File storage
- Text and vector search
- End-to-end types
Only in TimescaleDB
- Time-series Optimization
- PostgreSQL Extension
- Automatic Partitioning
- Continuous Aggregates
- Native Compression
- Full SQL Support
- Real-time Analytics
- PostgreSQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convex
- Collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediatelynot TimescaleDB
- Agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cachenot TimescaleDB
- Small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineersnot TimescaleDB
- Prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end TypeScript types remove a class of integration bugsnot TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
- Monitoringnot Convex
- IoT datanot Convex
- Financial datanot Convex
- Log analyticsnot Convex
- Observabilitynot Convex
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convex
- The Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- Transactions are bounded at one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written, so every backfill, migration or bulk import has to be chunked into scheduled batches rather than written as a single operation.
- There is no SQL and no query planner; you declare up to 32 indexes per table and traverse them, and joins are loops in TypeScript, so an unanticipated access pattern requires a schema and index change rather than a new query.
- It is not an analytical database, so reporting means streaming data out to a warehouse and BI tools cannot be pointed at Convex directly, which adds a pipeline the architecture diagram did not originally include.
- The application is written against Convex's function and client APIs rather than a standard protocol, so leaving means rewriting the data access layer and replacing the reactivity model, not repointing a connection string.
TimescaleDB
- Inherits PostgreSQL write path limitations, creating a ceiling on ingestion throughput
- Operational complexity increases significantly at scale, requiring expertise in chunk tuning and autovacuum management
- Bloom filter indexes on compressed columns can return incorrect query results before upgrade
- PostgreSQL 15 support ending June 2026, forcing mandatory upgrades to PostgreSQL 16 or later
Pricing, plan by plan
Convex
Free- Free & StarterFree
- Supports 1-6 developers
- Reactive database
- File storage
- Professional$25/month per developer
- Supports up to 20 developers
- All Starter features
- Log streaming
- Business & Enterprise$2500/month minimum
- Supports 50+ developers
- SAML/SSO
- Service SLAs
TimescaleDB
Free- Open SourceFree
- Self-hosted TimescaleDB
- MIT-licensed core
- Full PostgreSQL compatibility
- Scale Plan (Cloud)$36/month
- Compute and storage charges
- Multi-node HA
- Unlimited VPCs
Which should you pick?
Choose Convex if
- You need reactive queries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want typescript server functions.
Choose TimescaleDB if
- You need time-series optimization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want postgresql extension.
Questions people ask
- Is Convex or TimescaleDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convex starts at Free and TimescaleDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convex or TimescaleDB?
- Convex starts at Free and TimescaleDB at Free.
- Does Convex or TimescaleDB run on more platforms?
- Convex runs on Web. TimescaleDB runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- Can I use Convex for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convex best used for?
- Convex is most often used for collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately, agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache, small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineers, prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end typescript types remove a class of integration bugs. Of those, collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately and agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache are not what TimescaleDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Convex do that TimescaleDB cannot?
- Convex covers Reactive queries, TypeScript server functions, ACID transactions, Document database. TimescaleDB covers Time-series Optimization, PostgreSQL Extension, Automatic Partitioning, Continuous Aggregates.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convex: Is Convex open source?
It is source-available under FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0. You may read, modify and self-host it, but competing use is prohibited until each release converts to Apache 2.0 on its second anniversary.
TimescaleDB: Is TimescaleDB free?
Yes. TimescaleDB is free and open source under the Timescale License. The managed cloud service offers a free trial with $1,000 in credits expiring in 30 days.
SourceConvex: Can I self-host it?
Yes. The backend, dashboard and CLI can run on your own infrastructure, with most of the features of the cloud product. Self-hosted instances include a telemetry beacon that can be disabled.
TimescaleDB: What database does TimescaleDB run on top of?
TimescaleDB is a PostgreSQL extension that runs on top of PostgreSQL. You retain full PostgreSQL compatibility including SQL queries, transactions, and ecosystem tools.
SourceConvex: Does it support SQL?
No. Data is accessed through a TypeScript query builder over declared indexes. Relationships are traversed in code, which is explicit and type-safe but means no ad hoc querying.
TimescaleDB: How much can TimescaleDB compress data?
TimescaleDB offers transparent columnar compression that can reduce storage by up to 95%. Newer data remains in row-oriented format for fast writes, while older data is automatically compressed to the column store.
SourceConvex: What happens if a mutation exceeds the limits?
It fails rather than running longer, so bulk work must be split into batches and scheduled. The limits are per transaction: one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written.
TimescaleDB: Does TimescaleDB require manual partitioning?
No. TimescaleDB handles automatic time-based partitioning through hypertables. Data is automatically chunked based on time intervals, requiring no manual partition management.
SourceConvex: How does reactivity actually work?
Queries are deterministic functions and Convex records the data each one read. When a mutation changes that data, affected queries are re-run and subscribed clients receive the new result, so cache invalidation is handled by the platform.
TimescaleDB: What PostgreSQL versions does TimescaleDB support?
As of October 2025, TimescaleDB requires PostgreSQL 16 or greater. PostgreSQL 15 support will end with the June 2026 release, after which all instances must upgrade to PostgreSQL 16.
SourceRelated pages
More on TimescaleDB
Other head to heads
- Convex vs PostgreSQL
- Convex vs Airtable
- Convex vs Cockroach Labs
- Convex vs Amazon Aurora
- Convex vs Readyset
- Convex vs FaunaDB
- Convex vs LanceDB
- Convex vs Xata
- Convex vs Materialize
- Convex vs BigQuery
- Convex vs dbt
- Convex vs Apache Doris
- Convex vs ArangoDB
- Convex vs Canary Labs
- Convex vs Chroma
- Convex vs Cloudinary
- Convex vs DynamoDB
- Convex vs Apache Solr
- Convex vs QuestDB
- Convex vs ClickHouse
- Convex vs MotherDuck
- Convex vs YugabyteDB
- Convex vs Apache Druid
- Convex vs SingleStore
- Convex vs DuckDB
- Convex vs Elasticsearch
- Convex vs Dgraph
- Convex vs Dragonfly
- Convex vs Dremio
- Convex vs Fivetran HVR
- Convex vs Grist
- Convex vs IBM Db2
- Convex vs Apache Pinot
- Convex vs Apache Flink
- TimescaleDB vs PostgreSQL
- TimescaleDB vs Airtable
- TimescaleDB vs Cockroach Labs
- TimescaleDB vs Amazon Aurora
- TimescaleDB vs Readyset
- TimescaleDB vs FaunaDB
- TimescaleDB vs LanceDB
- TimescaleDB vs Xata
- TimescaleDB vs Materialize
- TimescaleDB vs BigQuery
- TimescaleDB vs dbt
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Doris
- TimescaleDB vs ArangoDB
- TimescaleDB vs Canary Labs
- TimescaleDB vs Chroma
- TimescaleDB vs Cloudinary
- TimescaleDB vs DynamoDB
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Solr
- TimescaleDB vs QuestDB
- TimescaleDB vs ClickHouse
- TimescaleDB vs MotherDuck
- TimescaleDB vs YugabyteDB
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Druid
- TimescaleDB vs SingleStore
- TimescaleDB vs DuckDB
- TimescaleDB vs Elasticsearch
- TimescaleDB vs Dgraph
- TimescaleDB vs Dragonfly
- TimescaleDB vs Dremio
- TimescaleDB vs Fivetran HVR
- TimescaleDB vs Grist
- TimescaleDB vs IBM Db2
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Pinot
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Flink
