Databases · head to head
Convex vs Fivetran HVR

Convex
Databases
Reactive backend combining a document database, TypeScript server functions and live queries, source-available under the Functional Source Licence.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Fivetran HVR
Databases
Log-based change data capture for database replication and synchronization
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Convex has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Convex the Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.; Fivetran HVR pricing not published separately; part of Fivetran's usage model
- They diverge on capability: Convex covers Reactive queries, Fivetran HVR covers Log-based change capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convex and Fivetran HVR actually diverge.
| Attribute | Convex | Fivetran HVR |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | Usage-based, integrated with Fivetran billing |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Data Warehouse, Data Lake, Operational Databases |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convex
- Reactive queries
- TypeScript server functions
- ACID transactions
- Document database
- Scheduling and workflows
- File storage
- Text and vector search
- End-to-end types
Only in Fivetran HVR
- Log-based change capture
- Real-time replication
- Schema evolution handling
- Multi-table consistency
- Zero-impact monitoring
- Fivetran integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convex
- Collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediatelynot Fivetran HVR
- Agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cachenot Fivetran HVR
- Small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineersnot Fivetran HVR
- Prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end TypeScript types remove a class of integration bugsnot Fivetran HVR
Fivetran HVR
- Real-time database replication to data warehousesnot Convex
- Maintaining operational copies for analyticsnot Convex
- Disaster recovery and business continuitynot Convex
- Feeding AI systems with fresh governed datanot Convex
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convex
- The Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- Transactions are bounded at one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written, so every backfill, migration or bulk import has to be chunked into scheduled batches rather than written as a single operation.
- There is no SQL and no query planner; you declare up to 32 indexes per table and traverse them, and joins are loops in TypeScript, so an unanticipated access pattern requires a schema and index change rather than a new query.
- It is not an analytical database, so reporting means streaming data out to a warehouse and BI tools cannot be pointed at Convex directly, which adds a pipeline the architecture diagram did not originally include.
- The application is written against Convex's function and client APIs rather than a standard protocol, so leaving means rewriting the data access layer and replacing the reactivity model, not repointing a connection string.
Fivetran HVR
- Pricing not published separately; part of Fivetran's usage model
- Requires Fivetran relationship for implementation
- Limited standalone documentation and community resources
- May be overkill for simple batch replication needs
- Competitive offerings provide more transparent per-connector pricing
Pricing, plan by plan
Convex
Free- Free & StarterFree
- Supports 1-6 developers
- Reactive database
- File storage
- Professional$25/month per developer
- Supports up to 20 developers
- All Starter features
- Log streaming
- Business & Enterprise$2500/month minimum
- Supports 50+ developers
- SAML/SSO
- Service SLAs
Fivetran HVR
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Fivetran HVR review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Convex if
- You need reactive queries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want typescript server functions.
Choose Fivetran HVR if
- You need log-based change capture.
- You work on Data Warehouse, Data Lake, Operational Databases.
- You also want real-time replication.
Questions people ask
- Is Convex or Fivetran HVR better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convex starts at Free and Fivetran HVR at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convex or Fivetran HVR?
- Convex has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Convex and On request for Fivetran HVR.
- Does Convex or Fivetran HVR run on more platforms?
- Convex runs on Web. Fivetran HVR runs on Data Warehouse, Data Lake, Operational Databases.
- Can I use Convex for free?
- Yes. Convex has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Fivetran HVR starts at On request.
- What is Convex best used for?
- Convex is most often used for collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately, agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache, small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineers, prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end typescript types remove a class of integration bugs. Of those, collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately and agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache are not what Fivetran HVR is typically brought in for.
- What can Convex do that Fivetran HVR cannot?
- Convex covers Reactive queries, TypeScript server functions, ACID transactions, Document database. Fivetran HVR covers Log-based change capture, Real-time replication, Schema evolution handling, Multi-table consistency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convex: Is Convex open source?
It is source-available under FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0. You may read, modify and self-host it, but competing use is prohibited until each release converts to Apache 2.0 on its second anniversary.
Fivetran HVR: What databases does Fivetran HVR support?
HVR supports major databases including Oracle, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and others that emit transaction logs.
SourceConvex: Can I self-host it?
Yes. The backend, dashboard and CLI can run on your own infrastructure, with most of the features of the cloud product. Self-hosted instances include a telemetry beacon that can be disabled.
Fivetran HVR: Is HVR part of standard Fivetran pricing?
Yes, HVR is integrated into Fivetran's usage-based pricing model with standard per-row-synced and transformation costs.
SourceConvex: Does it support SQL?
No. Data is accessed through a TypeScript query builder over declared indexes. Relationships are traversed in code, which is explicit and type-safe but means no ad hoc querying.
Convex: What happens if a mutation exceeds the limits?
It fails rather than running longer, so bulk work must be split into batches and scheduled. The limits are per transaction: one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written.
Convex: How does reactivity actually work?
Queries are deterministic functions and Convex records the data each one read. When a mutation changes that data, affected queries are re-run and subscribed clients receive the new result, so cache invalidation is handled by the platform.
Related pages
More on Fivetran HVR
Other head to heads
- Convex vs PostgreSQL
- Convex vs Airtable
- Convex vs Cockroach Labs
- Convex vs Amazon Aurora
- Convex vs Readyset
- Convex vs FaunaDB
- Convex vs LanceDB
- Convex vs Xata
- Convex vs Materialize
- Convex vs BigQuery
- Convex vs dbt
- Convex vs Apache Doris
- Convex vs ArangoDB
- Convex vs Canary Labs
- Convex vs Chroma
- Convex vs Cloudinary
- Convex vs DynamoDB
- Convex vs Apache Solr
- Convex vs Estuary
- Convex vs Apache Druid
- Convex vs SingleStore
- Convex vs ClickHouse
- Convex vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Convex vs NATS
- Convex vs ScyllaDB
- Convex vs Solace PubSub+
- Convex vs SQLite
- Convex vs StarRocks
- Convex vs SurrealDB
- Convex vs Teradata
- Convex vs Apache Pinot
- Convex vs Apache Flink
- Convex vs Apache Kafka
- Convex vs Apache Pulsar
- Convex vs CouchDB
- Fivetran HVR vs PostgreSQL
- Fivetran HVR vs Airtable
- Fivetran HVR vs Cockroach Labs
- Fivetran HVR vs Amazon Aurora
- Fivetran HVR vs Readyset
- Fivetran HVR vs FaunaDB
- Fivetran HVR vs LanceDB
- Fivetran HVR vs Xata
- Fivetran HVR vs Materialize
- Fivetran HVR vs BigQuery
- Fivetran HVR vs dbt
- Fivetran HVR vs Apache Doris
- Fivetran HVR vs ArangoDB
- Fivetran HVR vs Canary Labs
- Fivetran HVR vs Chroma
- Fivetran HVR vs Cloudinary
- Fivetran HVR vs DynamoDB
- Fivetran HVR vs Apache Solr
- Fivetran HVR vs Estuary
- Fivetran HVR vs Apache Druid
- Fivetran HVR vs SingleStore
- Fivetran HVR vs ClickHouse
- Fivetran HVR vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Fivetran HVR vs NATS
- Fivetran HVR vs ScyllaDB
- Fivetran HVR vs Solace PubSub+
- Fivetran HVR vs SQLite
- Fivetran HVR vs StarRocks
- Fivetran HVR vs SurrealDB
- Fivetran HVR vs Teradata
- Fivetran HVR vs Apache Pinot
- Fivetran HVR vs Apache Flink
- Fivetran HVR vs Apache Kafka
- Fivetran HVR vs Apache Pulsar
- Fivetran HVR vs CouchDB
