Databases · head to head
Apache Doris vs TimescaleDB

Apache Doris
Databases
MPP analytical database with a MySQL wire protocol and sub-second aggregation on wide tables
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

TimescaleDB
Databases
Time-series database built on PostgreSQL for real-time analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Doris two competing commercial vendors, VeloDB and SelectDB, were founded by overlapping core contributors, which makes the long-term governance and roadmap of the project harder to predict than a single-sponsor project.; TimescaleDB inherits PostgreSQL write path limitations, creating a ceiling on ingestion throughput
- They diverge on capability: Apache Doris covers MySQL wire protocol, TimescaleDB covers Time-series Optimization.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Doris and TimescaleDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Doris | TimescaleDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure) |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Doris
- MySQL wire protocol
- Aggregate and unique key models
- Materialised views
- Multi-catalogue federation
- Routine load from Kafka
- Compute storage separation
- Inverted indexes
- Workload groups
Only in TimescaleDB
- Time-series Optimization
- PostgreSQL Extension
- Automatic Partitioning
- Continuous Aggregates
- Native Compression
- Full SQL Support
- Real-time Analytics
- PostgreSQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Doris
- A team whose MySQL read replica can no longer serve reporting queries and wants an OLAP engine its existing drivers already speaknot TimescaleDB
- A real-time dashboard backend needing sub-second aggregation over billions of rows with hundreds of concurrent usersnot TimescaleDB
- An ad or ecommerce platform that needs updates and deletes on analytical tables, which append-only OLAP engines handle badlynot TimescaleDB
- A data team that wants one SQL endpoint over both internal tables and existing Hive or Iceberg tables in the lakenot TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
- Monitoringnot Apache Doris
- IoT datanot Apache Doris
- Financial datanot Apache Doris
- Log analyticsnot Apache Doris
- Observabilitynot Apache Doris
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Doris
- Two competing commercial vendors, VeloDB and SelectDB, were founded by overlapping core contributors, which makes the long-term governance and roadmap of the project harder to predict than a single-sponsor project.
- A large share of design discussion, issue reports and documentation detail originates in Chinese, so teams that do not read it get a thinner picture of known problems and workarounds.
- Operating a cluster means managing frontend and backend node roles, tablet balancing and compaction tuning, and compaction backlogs under heavy upsert load are a recurring production complaint.
- The MySQL protocol compatibility is at the wire level, not full MySQL semantics, so queries and functions still need porting and the familiarity can mislead.
- Managed cloud availability outside China and major clouds is limited compared with ClickHouse or Snowflake, so many Western adopters end up self-hosting whether they wanted to or not.
TimescaleDB
- Inherits PostgreSQL write path limitations, creating a ceiling on ingestion throughput
- Operational complexity increases significantly at scale, requiring expertise in chunk tuning and autovacuum management
- Bloom filter indexes on compressed columns can return incorrect query results before upgrade
- PostgreSQL 15 support ending June 2026, forcing mandatory upgrades to PostgreSQL 16 or later
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Doris
Free- Apache DorisFree
- Apache 2.0 licence with no usage restrictions
- All engine features included
- Community support via mailing list and Slack
TimescaleDB
Free- Open SourceFree
- Self-hosted TimescaleDB
- MIT-licensed core
- Full PostgreSQL compatibility
- Scale Plan (Cloud)$36/month
- Compute and storage charges
- Multi-node HA
- Unlimited VPCs
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Doris if
- You need mysql wire protocol.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want aggregate and unique key models.
Choose TimescaleDB if
- You need time-series optimization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want postgresql extension.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Doris or TimescaleDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Doris starts at Free and TimescaleDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Doris or TimescaleDB?
- Apache Doris starts at Free and TimescaleDB at Free.
- Does Apache Doris or TimescaleDB run on more platforms?
- Apache Doris runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. TimescaleDB runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- Can I use Apache Doris for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Doris best used for?
- Apache Doris is most often used for a team whose mysql read replica can no longer serve reporting queries and wants an olap engine its existing drivers already speak, a real-time dashboard backend needing sub-second aggregation over billions of rows with hundreds of concurrent users, an ad or ecommerce platform that needs updates and deletes on analytical tables, which append-only olap engines handle badly, a data team that wants one sql endpoint over both internal tables and existing hive or iceberg tables in the lake. Of those, a team whose mysql read replica can no longer serve reporting queries and wants an olap engine its existing drivers already speak and a real-time dashboard backend needing sub-second aggregation over billions of rows with hundreds of concurrent users are not what TimescaleDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Doris do that TimescaleDB cannot?
- Apache Doris covers MySQL wire protocol, Aggregate and unique key models, Materialised views, Multi-catalogue federation. TimescaleDB covers Time-series Optimization, PostgreSQL Extension, Automatic Partitioning, Continuous Aggregates.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Doris: Is Apache Doris really free?
Yes, it is Apache 2.0 with no usage restrictions. The commercial products are managed services from VeloDB and SelectDB.
TimescaleDB: Is TimescaleDB free?
Yes. TimescaleDB is free and open source under the Timescale License. The managed cloud service offers a free trial with $1,000 in credits expiring in 30 days.
SourceApache Doris: Can I use my MySQL tools with it?
Yes, it implements the MySQL wire protocol, so clients and BI connectors attach without a new driver, though SQL semantics differ.
TimescaleDB: What database does TimescaleDB run on top of?
TimescaleDB is a PostgreSQL extension that runs on top of PostgreSQL. You retain full PostgreSQL compatibility including SQL queries, transactions, and ecosystem tools.
SourceApache Doris: How does it compare with ClickHouse?
Doris handles updates and high concurrency more comfortably; ClickHouse is generally faster on raw single-query scan throughput and has far wider Western support.
TimescaleDB: How much can TimescaleDB compress data?
TimescaleDB offers transparent columnar compression that can reduce storage by up to 95%. Newer data remains in row-oriented format for fast writes, while older data is automatically compressed to the column store.
SourceApache Doris: Who maintains it?
The Apache Software Foundation project, with most committers employed by VeloDB or SelectDB.
TimescaleDB: Does TimescaleDB require manual partitioning?
No. TimescaleDB handles automatic time-based partitioning through hypertables. Data is automatically chunked based on time intervals, requiring no manual partition management.
SourceTimescaleDB: What PostgreSQL versions does TimescaleDB support?
As of October 2025, TimescaleDB requires PostgreSQL 16 or greater. PostgreSQL 15 support will end with the June 2026 release, after which all instances must upgrade to PostgreSQL 16.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Doris
More on TimescaleDB
Other head to heads
- Apache Doris vs ClickHouse
- Apache Doris vs StarRocks
- Apache Doris vs Tinybird
- Apache Doris vs DuckDB
- Apache Doris vs Firebolt
- Apache Doris vs Amazon Redshift
- Apache Doris vs TiDB
- Apache Doris vs BigQuery
- Apache Doris vs Canary Labs
- Apache Doris vs Dragonfly
- Apache Doris vs Dremio
- Apache Doris vs Readyset
- Apache Doris vs Fivetran HVR
- Apache Doris vs Grist
- Apache Doris vs IBM Db2
- Apache Doris vs Instaclustr
- Apache Doris vs Knack
- Apache Doris vs LanceDB
- Apache Doris vs QuestDB
- Apache Doris vs MotherDuck
- Apache Doris vs YugabyteDB
- Apache Doris vs Apache Druid
- Apache Doris vs SingleStore
- Apache Doris vs Cockroach Labs
- Apache Doris vs Amazon Aurora
- Apache Doris vs Elasticsearch
- Apache Doris vs Dgraph
- Apache Doris vs Apache Pinot
- Apache Doris vs Apache Flink
- TimescaleDB vs ClickHouse
- TimescaleDB vs StarRocks
- TimescaleDB vs Tinybird
- TimescaleDB vs DuckDB
- TimescaleDB vs Firebolt
- TimescaleDB vs Amazon Redshift
- TimescaleDB vs TiDB
- TimescaleDB vs BigQuery
- TimescaleDB vs Canary Labs
- TimescaleDB vs Dragonfly
- TimescaleDB vs Dremio
- TimescaleDB vs Readyset
- TimescaleDB vs Fivetran HVR
- TimescaleDB vs Grist
- TimescaleDB vs IBM Db2
- TimescaleDB vs Instaclustr
- TimescaleDB vs Knack
- TimescaleDB vs LanceDB
- TimescaleDB vs QuestDB
- TimescaleDB vs MotherDuck
- TimescaleDB vs YugabyteDB
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Druid
- TimescaleDB vs SingleStore
- TimescaleDB vs Cockroach Labs
- TimescaleDB vs Amazon Aurora
- TimescaleDB vs Elasticsearch
- TimescaleDB vs Dgraph
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Pinot
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Flink
