Is Cone or Practice better?

Neither clearly leads. Cone starts at On request and Practice at $40/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Cone or Practice?

Cone starts at On request and Practice at $40/month.

Does Cone or Practice run on more platforms?

Cone runs on Web. Practice runs on Web, Ios.

What is Cone best used for?

Cone is most often used for a bookkeeping practice moving clients from ad hoc invoicing onto signed recurring fee agreements, an accountancy firm that needs engagement letter wording attached to every proposal for compliance reasons, a practice losing revenue to out of scope work that is never billed because nobody notices it, standardising pricing across a firm so that partners stop quoting the same service at different rates. Of those, a bookkeeping practice moving clients from ad hoc invoicing onto signed recurring fee agreements and an accountancy firm that needs engagement letter wording attached to every proposal for compliance reasons are not what Practice is typically brought in for.

What can Cone do that Practice cannot?

Cone covers Engagement letters, Electronic signature, Recurring billing, Direct debit collection. Practice covers Scheduling, Client portal, Contracts, Invoicing.

Proposals · head to head

Cone vs Practice

Cone

Proposals

Proposal to payment software for accounting and bookkeeping firms, with engagement letters and direct debit

From: On request
Rated: -

Full review Website

Practice

Calendars

Client management for coaches and consultants

From: $40/month
Rated: -

Full review Website

The short version

Each has a real cost: Cone the product is shaped around accountancy engagements, so a freelancer or agency outside professional services pays for engagement letter and compliance features they will never open.; Practice the Internet Archive's capture of Practice's homepage on 14 December 2020 showed the product was in a 'Request early access' pre-launch phase, with no pricing figures published at that time.
They diverge on capability: Cone covers Engagement letters, Practice covers Scheduling.
Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Cone and Practice actually diverge.

Attributes where Cone and Practice differ
Attribute	Cone	Practice
Starting price	On request	$40/month
Pricing model	quote	subscription
Platforms	Web	Web, Ios
Category	Proposals	Calendars
Founded	Unknown	2020

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Cone

Engagement letters
Electronic signature
Recurring billing
Direct debit collection
Scope creep flagging
Service line templates
Client onboarding tasks

Only in Practice

Scheduling
Client portal
Contracts
Invoicing
Session notes
Google Calendar
Zoom
Stripe

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Cone

A bookkeeping practice moving clients from ad hoc invoicing onto signed recurring fee agreementsnot Practice
An accountancy firm that needs engagement letter wording attached to every proposal for compliance reasonsnot Practice
A practice losing revenue to out of scope work that is never billed because nobody notices itnot Practice
Standardising pricing across a firm so that partners stop quoting the same service at different ratesnot Practice

Practice

Schedulingnot Cone
Appointment bookingnot Cone
Time trackingnot Cone
Resource managementnot Cone
Team coordinationnot Cone

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Cone

The product is shaped around accountancy engagements, so a freelancer or agency outside professional services pays for engagement letter and compliance features they will never open.
Recurring collection depends on which payment rails are supported in your country, and direct debit coverage varies enough that the headline benefit may not apply to your client base.
Practice management integration is shallower than the incumbents, so client records often exist in two systems and have to be reconciled.
Pricing is not published, which makes it hard to compare against a general proposal tool without entering a sales process first.
As a younger vendor in a market that consolidates through acquisition, roadmap continuity carries more risk than choosing an established practice software supplier.

Practice

The Internet Archive's capture of Practice's homepage on 14 December 2020 showed the product was in a 'Request early access' pre-launch phase, with no pricing figures published at that time.

Pricing, plan by plan

Cone

On request

Cone$undefined/year
- Proposals and engagement letters
- Electronic signature
- Recurring billing and direct debit mandates

Practice

$40/month

Essential$40/month
- Scheduling
- Client portal
- Contracts
Professional$70/month
- All features
- Custom domain
- Priority support

Which should you pick?

Choose Cone if

You need engagement letters.
You also want electronic signature.

Cone review

Choose Practice if

You need scheduling.
You work on Web, Ios.
You also want client portal.

Practice review

Questions people ask

Is Cone or Practice better?: Neither clearly leads. Cone starts at On request and Practice at $40/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Cone or Practice?: Cone starts at On request and Practice at $40/month.
Does Cone or Practice run on more platforms?: Cone runs on Web. Practice runs on Web, Ios.
What is Cone best used for?: Cone is most often used for a bookkeeping practice moving clients from ad hoc invoicing onto signed recurring fee agreements, an accountancy firm that needs engagement letter wording attached to every proposal for compliance reasons, a practice losing revenue to out of scope work that is never billed because nobody notices it, standardising pricing across a firm so that partners stop quoting the same service at different rates. Of those, a bookkeeping practice moving clients from ad hoc invoicing onto signed recurring fee agreements and an accountancy firm that needs engagement letter wording attached to every proposal for compliance reasons are not what Practice is typically brought in for.
What can Cone do that Practice cannot?: Cone covers Engagement letters, Electronic signature, Recurring billing, Direct debit collection. Practice covers Scheduling, Client portal, Contracts, Invoicing.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Cone: Is this only for accountants?

It is designed for accounting and bookkeeping firms. Other professional services firms use it, but general freelancers will find most of it irrelevant.

Cone: Does it handle recurring fees?

Yes, and that is the main reason firms adopt it. Acceptance creates the fee schedule and the collection mandate together.

Cone: How are payments collected?

Through supported card and direct debit providers, whose processing fees apply on top of the subscription.

Cone: What is scope creep flagging?

It compares work performed against the scope agreed in the proposal and surfaces the difference so it can be billed rather than absorbed.

Cone: Is pricing published?

Not in a form that can be quoted reliably. Expect a sales conversation before you can compare it on cost.

Cone vs Practice

Cone

Practice

The short version

Where they differ

What each one covers

Only in Cone

Only in Practice

What people use each for

Cone

Practice

Where each one falls short

Cone

Practice

Pricing, plan by plan

Cone

Practice

Which should you pick?

Choose Cone if

Choose Practice if

Questions people ask

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Related pages

More on Cone

More on Practice

Keep looking

Other head to heads