Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs Feedzai

Feedzai
Cybersecurity
Real-time transaction fraud and financial crime detection for banks and payment processors
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Cody has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page; Feedzai pricing is per transaction with an annual minimum, so a bank with seasonal or growing volume commits to a floor it may not use and pays overage above the band.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and Feedzai actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Feedzai does not also cover.
Only in Feedzai
- Real-time scoring
- Rule and model hybrid
- Case manager
- Behavioural biometrics
- Model explainability
- Deployment options
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Feedzai
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Feedzai
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Feedzai
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Feedzai
Feedzai
- A bank joining an instant payments scheme where transfers are irrevocable and post-hoc recovery is impossiblenot Cody
- A card issuer whose existing rules engine cannot be changed without a release, so fraud waves run for daysnot Cody
- An acquirer needing per-merchant risk models rather than one portfolio-wide modelnot Cody
- A bank required by its regulator to explain automated declines to customers, which rules out opaque scoringnot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Feedzai
- Pricing is per transaction with an annual minimum, so a bank with seasonal or growing volume commits to a floor it may not use and pays overage above the band.
- It sits in the authorisation path, which makes every upgrade a change-controlled event with rollback plans, and the operational burden falls on the bank rather than the vendor.
- Out of the box models need months of the customer own labelled fraud history before they beat the rules they replace, so the value case starts late.
- AML and fraud are licensed as separate modules, so institutions expecting one platform fee find the transaction monitoring capability is a second line item.
- The buyer profile is large institutions, so smaller banks and fintechs face minimums that make per-transaction economics unattractive below significant scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Feedzai
On request- Feedzai Financial Crime Platform$undefined/year
- Priced by transaction volume with annual minimum commitment
- Modules for fraud, AML and account opening licensed separately
- Cloud, private cloud and on-premises deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose Feedzai if
- You need real-time scoring.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want rule and model hybrid.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or Feedzai better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and Feedzai at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or Feedzai?
- Cody has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cody and On request for Feedzai.
- Does Cody or Feedzai run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. Feedzai runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Yes. Cody has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Feedzai starts at On request.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what Feedzai is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that Feedzai cannot?
- Feedzai covers Real-time scoring, Rule and model hybrid, Case manager, Behavioural biometrics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceFeedzai: Can Feedzai run on-premises?
Yes. On-premises and private cloud deployments are supported, which is why it appears in markets where transaction data cannot legally leave the country.
Cody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceFeedzai: Does it cover AML as well as fraud?
It does, but transaction monitoring is a separately licensed module. Assume two line items if you want both.
Cody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceFeedzai: How fast are decisions?
Designed for the authorisation window, typically tens of milliseconds. This is the constraint that rules out batch scoring architectures.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Steampipe
- Cody vs Tilt
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Avo
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs Unit21
- Cody vs ThetaRay
- Cody vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Cody vs NICE Actimize
- Cody vs Quantexa
- Cody vs Sardine
- Cody vs Silent Eight
- Cody vs Transmit Security
- Cody vs Fenergo
- Cody vs Socure
- Cody vs Sumsub
- Cody vs iDenfy
- Cody vs BeyondTrust
- Cody vs Bitdefender VPN
- Cody vs Burp Suite
- Cody vs Check Point Software
- Cody vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Cody vs Darktrace
- Feedzai vs Turborepo
- Feedzai vs Visual Studio Code
- Feedzai vs ESLint
- Feedzai vs pnpm
- Feedzai vs Sourcegraph
- Feedzai vs Sweep
- Feedzai vs Deep Code
- Feedzai vs GitHub Copilot
- Feedzai vs Bazel
- Feedzai vs Fig
- Feedzai vs GoLand
- Feedzai vs Steampipe
- Feedzai vs Tilt
- Feedzai vs WarpBuild
- Feedzai vs Webpack
- Feedzai vs Avo
- Feedzai vs Azure DevOps
- Feedzai vs PhpStorm
- Feedzai vs Unit21
- Feedzai vs ThetaRay
- Feedzai vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Feedzai vs NICE Actimize
- Feedzai vs Quantexa
- Feedzai vs Sardine
- Feedzai vs Silent Eight
- Feedzai vs Transmit Security
- Feedzai vs Fenergo
- Feedzai vs Socure
- Feedzai vs Sumsub
- Feedzai vs iDenfy
- Feedzai vs BeyondTrust
- Feedzai vs Bitdefender VPN
- Feedzai vs Burp Suite
- Feedzai vs Check Point Software
- Feedzai vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Feedzai vs Darktrace

