Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs Endor Labs

Endor Labs
Cybersecurity
Security and AI agent governance for code and supply chain
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page; Endor Labs pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and Endor Labs actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cody | Endor Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Seat-based per contributing developer with volume discounts |
| Platforms | Web | Web, CLI, IDE |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2013 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Endor Labs does not also cover.
Only in Endor Labs
- AI coding agent governance
- SAST scanning
- Secrets detection
- Reachability analysis
- Open source dependency scanning
- Package firewall
- MCP server integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Endor Labs
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Endor Labs
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Endor Labs
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Endor Labs
Endor Labs
- Securing AI coding agent outputs before deploymentnot Cody
- Reducing SAST false positives with reachability analysisnot Cody
- Managing open source supply chain risknot Cody
- Enforcing security policies in CI/CD pipelinesnot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Endor Labs
- Pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- Developer tier lacks UI and historical scan data
- Free tier limited to local scanning only
- Seat-based model may become expensive for large teams
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Endor Labs
Free- DeveloperFree
- Local scanning
- Read-only vulnerability data
- No UI, policies, or scan history
Which should you pick?
Choose Endor Labs if
- You need ai coding agent governance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE.
- You also want sast scanning.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or Endor Labs better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and Endor Labs at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or Endor Labs?
- Cody starts at Free and Endor Labs at Free.
- Does Cody or Endor Labs run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. Endor Labs runs on Web, CLI, IDE.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what Endor Labs is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that Endor Labs cannot?
- Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance, SAST scanning, Secrets detection, Reachability analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceEndor Labs: What is the difference between Endor Labs Developer and paid tiers?
Developer tier is free and provides local scanning via MCP server with read-only vulnerability access and no UI. Paid tiers (Core and Pro) add team features like policy enforcement, enterprise integrations, reporting, and scan history.
SourceCody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceEndor Labs: How does Endor Labs define seats for pricing?
Seats are calculated per contributing developer (those with commits in monitored repositories within the last 90 days). Volume discounts apply as team size grows.
SourceCody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceEndor Labs: Does Endor Labs support on-premises deployment?
The platform is cloud-based SaaS by default. Enterprise customers should contact sales to discuss custom deployment options.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Steampipe
- Cody vs Tilt
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Avo
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs Snyk
- Cody vs Socket
- Cody vs Chainguard
- Cody vs Akeyless
- Cody vs Doppler
- Cody vs Arnica
- Cody vs Infisical
- Cody vs Veracode
- Cody vs Speakeasy
- Cody vs Tenable
- Cody vs HashiCorp Vault
- Cody vs Transcend
- Cody vs Windscribe
- Cody vs Yoti
- Cody vs authentik
- Cody vs Avast One
- Cody vs Cosign
- Endor Labs vs Turborepo
- Endor Labs vs Visual Studio Code
- Endor Labs vs ESLint
- Endor Labs vs pnpm
- Endor Labs vs Sourcegraph
- Endor Labs vs Sweep
- Endor Labs vs Deep Code
- Endor Labs vs GitHub Copilot
- Endor Labs vs Bazel
- Endor Labs vs Fig
- Endor Labs vs GoLand
- Endor Labs vs Steampipe
- Endor Labs vs Tilt
- Endor Labs vs WarpBuild
- Endor Labs vs Webpack
- Endor Labs vs Avo
- Endor Labs vs Azure DevOps
- Endor Labs vs PhpStorm
- Endor Labs vs Snyk
- Endor Labs vs Socket
- Endor Labs vs Chainguard
- Endor Labs vs Akeyless
- Endor Labs vs Doppler
- Endor Labs vs Arnica
- Endor Labs vs Infisical
- Endor Labs vs Veracode
- Endor Labs vs Speakeasy
- Endor Labs vs Tenable
- Endor Labs vs HashiCorp Vault
- Endor Labs vs Transcend
- Endor Labs vs Windscribe
- Endor Labs vs Yoti
- Endor Labs vs authentik
- Endor Labs vs Avast One
- Endor Labs vs Cosign

