Dragonflyvs
Redis


Redis: Traditional open-source in-memory datastore, significantly slower but more established ecosystem

High-performance Redis-compatible in-memory datastore with 25x better throughput
Overview
Dragonfly is a high-performance in-memory datastore designed as a Redis and Memcached compatible alternative. Built on a novel thread-per-core architecture with new algorithms and data structures, Dragonfly achieves 25 times higher queries per second than Redis (3.97M QPS versus 718K) while using 30% less memory. The platform maintains full API compatibility with Redis and Memcached, allowing existing applications to migrate with minimal code changes. Dragonfly is optimized for low-latency caching, real-time feature serving for machine learning applications, concurrency-safe message queues with high throughput, and real-time leaderboards. The platform supports caching workloads up to 1TB with 1M peak throughput per instance. Dragonfly Cloud is a managed service offering serverless deployment with auto-scaling, while Community Edition is available as open source.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Dragonfly.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Redis: Traditional open-source in-memory datastore, significantly slower but more established ecosystem


Memcached: Lightweight in-memory cache, simpler but less feature-rich than Dragonfly


Valkey: Redis fork offering similar compatibility but different architecture and governance
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Free Tier
Free
Business
$2,000 /mo
Enterprise
On request
Capabilities
Redis API compatibility
Full API compatibility for drop-in migration
Thread-per-core architecture
Novel multi-threaded design for massive throughput
High-performance caching
25x higher QPS than Redis with low latency
Memory efficiency
30% better memory efficiency than Redis
Real-time leaderboards
Sorted sets for gaming and ranking applications
Message queue support
Concurrency-safe queues with high throughput
ML feature serving
Low-latency feature store for real-time ML models
Cloud deployment
Managed Dragonfly Cloud with auto-scaling
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Dragonfly achieves 3.97M queries per second compared to Redis's 718K QPS, representing a 25x improvement. Memory efficiency is also 30% better.
SourceYes. Dragonfly maintains full API compatibility with Redis and Memcached, allowing drop-in replacement with minimal to no code modifications.
SourceKeep looking
The cloud-native distributed SQL database
The world's most advanced open source relational database
Create apps that perfectly fit your team's needs
MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud
The heart of the Elastic Stack for search and analytics
Open-source distributed event streaming platform
The MySQL-compatible serverless database
Fast open-source search engine built for typo tolerance
The Database for the Age of AI Agents
Intelligent, scalable cloud database service from Microsoft
Fast open-source column-oriented database for real-time analytics
The modern database for enterprise applications
Fast in-process analytical database
The open source relational database for the enterprise
The world's most complete, reliable, and secure database
Cross-platform database IDE from JetBrains for SQL and NoSQL databases
Sub-second analytics at cloud data warehouse scale
Fully managed relational database service for MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Dragonfly, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Enterprise search platform built on Apache Lucene
High-performance messaging system for cloud-native applications
Kafka-compatible streaming platform with no ZooKeeper or JVM
Open-source message broker supporting AMQP and other protocols
Open-source search and analytics suite forked from Elasticsearch
Distributed memory object caching system
Cloud-native messaging and streaming with separated storage
Stateful stream processing at scale