APIs · head to head
Codat vs Moov

Codat
APIs
One API for small business accounting, banking and commerce data
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Moov
APIs
Payments API with a published rate card covering card acceptance, ACH and instant payouts
- From
- $500/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Codat the accounting platforms are metering developer access themselves, with Xero introducing tiered connection based developer pricing from 2 March 2026, so a cost you do not control has been inserted between you and the data and it scales with the number of customers you connect.; Moov the 500 US dollar monthly minimum makes Moov unattractive below roughly 80,000 dollars a month of card volume, since the minimum rather than the rate becomes your effective price.
- They diverge on capability: Codat covers Normalised accounting API, Moov covers Interchange-plus card acceptance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Codat and Moov actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Codat
- Normalised accounting API
- Banking and commerce data
- Lending products
- Write-back
- Business verification
- Supplier onboarding
- Connection management
- Data quality handling
Only in Moov
- Interchange-plus card acceptance
- ACH transfers
- Instant payments
- Wallets
- Payment links and invoices
- Virtual cards
- Account verification
- Card account updater
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Codat
- A business lender that wants live ledger data for underwriting rather than a borrower emailing exported PDF accountsnot Moov
- A commercial bank monitoring covenant compliance across a portfolio of small business borrowers continuously rather than quarterlynot Moov
- A payment company verifying a merchant trading history before extending working capitalnot Moov
- A B2B platform writing bills and payments back into a customer accounting system so reconciliation happens automaticallynot Moov
Moov
- A vertical SaaS company embedding payments that needs published unit economics to price its own product before signing anythingnot Codat
- A marketplace paying contractors that wants same-day ACH and instant push-to-card in one API with the cost of each visiblenot Codat
- A platform that must hold balances for end users between collection and payout without becoming a money transmitternot Codat
- A software company moving off a legacy gateway that wants interchange-plus transparency instead of a blended rate that hides interchange increasesnot Codat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Codat
- The accounting platforms are metering developer access themselves, with Xero introducing tiered connection based developer pricing from 2 March 2026, so a cost you do not control has been inserted between you and the data and it scales with the number of customers you connect.
- Pricing is opaque and enterprise shaped for a product developers expect to evaluate technically first, so build decisions get made before anyone knows the unit economics.
- Normalisation hides but does not remove the underlying differences between accounting systems, and edge cases in multi-currency, journals and tax handling surface as data quality problems that your team must reason about in each source system anyway.
- Data quality depends on the small business keeping its books properly, so a lender using ledger data for underwriting inherits the bookkeeping standard of its worst borrower and needs its own validation layer regardless.
- Connection breakage from expired tokens and platform API changes is an ongoing operational load, and a borrower whose connection lapses stops being monitored silently, which is the failure mode that matters most in a lending portfolio.
Moov
- The 500 US dollar monthly minimum makes Moov unattractive below roughly 80,000 dollars a month of card volume, since the minimum rather than the rate becomes your effective price.
- The 50 cent monthly charge per active wallet penalises platforms with many end users who transact rarely, and that cost grows with your user base rather than your revenue.
- United States only, so any platform with international sellers or buyers needs a second provider and a second reconciliation process.
- At very high volume the published interchange-plus markup is less competitive than a directly negotiated acquiring relationship, so success eventually creates a reason to leave.
- The ecosystem of prebuilt integrations, plugins and third-party tooling is far smaller than Stripe's, so anything outside the core API, from tax handling to subscription logic, is work you build yourself.
Pricing, plan by plan
Codat
On request- Codat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced by connected companies, data types and products
- Lending and verification products priced above core data access
- Annual enterprise agreements
Moov
$500/month- Standard$500/month
- 500 USD monthly minimum, no setup fee
- Card online at interchange plus 0.60% and 15c
- Tap to pay at interchange plus 0.50% and 15c
- Custom$undefined/month
- Negotiated rates for high volume
- Specialised business models
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Codat if
- You need normalised accounting api.
- You work on API, Web.
- You also want banking and commerce data.
Choose Moov if
- You need interchange-plus card acceptance.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android.
- You also want ach transfers.
Questions people ask
- Is Codat or Moov better?
- Neither clearly leads. Codat starts at On request and Moov at $500/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Codat or Moov?
- Codat starts at On request and Moov at $500/month.
- Does Codat or Moov run on more platforms?
- Codat runs on API, Web. Moov runs on Web, API, iOS, Android.
- What is Codat best used for?
- Codat is most often used for a business lender that wants live ledger data for underwriting rather than a borrower emailing exported pdf accounts, a commercial bank monitoring covenant compliance across a portfolio of small business borrowers continuously rather than quarterly, a payment company verifying a merchant trading history before extending working capital, a b2b platform writing bills and payments back into a customer accounting system so reconciliation happens automatically. Of those, a business lender that wants live ledger data for underwriting rather than a borrower emailing exported pdf accounts and a commercial bank monitoring covenant compliance across a portfolio of small business borrowers continuously rather than quarterly are not what Moov is typically brought in for.
- What can Codat do that Moov cannot?
- Codat covers Normalised accounting API, Banking and commerce data, Lending products, Write-back. Moov covers Interchange-plus card acceptance, ACH transfers, Instant payments, Wallets.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Codat: What is changing with Xero in 2026?
Xero is introducing a tiered, usage based developer pricing model effective 2 March 2026, with tiers based on the number of customer connections an app holds. That is a new cost in the chain for anyone reading Xero data at scale, whether directly or through Codat.
Moov: Does Moov publish its prices?
Yes, in unusual detail: interchange-plus card rates, per-transaction ACH and RTP charges, dispute and return fees, and the monthly minimum are all on the pricing page.
Codat: Can Codat write data back?
Yes. It supports pushing bills, payments and journal entries into accounting systems, not only reading from them.
Moov: What is the monthly minimum?
500 US dollars, with no setup fee. Wallet charges and transaction fees count towards it.
Codat: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted by connected companies, data types and products, and users consistently describe it as opaque.
Moov: Can I use Moov outside the United States?
No. Moov handles US payments only, though it accepts international cards at an extra 1.5 percent.
Codat: Does it replace bank data aggregation?
Not entirely. It covers banking alongside accounting and commerce, but lenders commonly run it beside a bank aggregator for transaction level cash flow.
Moov: Is Moov a bank?
No. It is a payments platform working with partner financial institutions, so account and settlement arrangements depend on those partners.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Codat vs Rutter
- Codat vs Swan
- Codat vs Fintech Farm
- Codat vs Treasury Prime
- Codat vs Synctera
- Codat vs Solaris
- Codat vs Increase
- Codat vs Column
- Codat vs Griffin
- Codat vs Lithic
- Codat vs Unit
- Codat vs Vodeno
- Codat vs Bruno
- Codat vs Bud Financial
- Codat vs Episode Six
- Codat vs Kong Gateway
- Codat vs Marqeta
- Codat vs Meniga
- Codat vs Dwolla
- Codat vs Formance
- Codat vs Sila
- Codat vs Trustly
- Codat vs Volt
- Codat vs Basis Theory
- Codat vs TrueLayer
- Codat vs Highnote
- Codat vs Yapily
- Codat vs Backbase
- Codat vs Enfuce
- Codat vs Stoplight
- Moov vs Rutter
- Moov vs Swan
- Moov vs Fintech Farm
- Moov vs Treasury Prime
- Moov vs Synctera
- Moov vs Solaris
- Moov vs Increase
- Moov vs Column
- Moov vs Griffin
- Moov vs Lithic
- Moov vs Unit
- Moov vs Vodeno
- Moov vs Bruno
- Moov vs Bud Financial
- Moov vs Episode Six
- Moov vs Kong Gateway
- Moov vs Marqeta
- Moov vs Meniga
- Moov vs Dwolla
- Moov vs Formance
- Moov vs Sila
- Moov vs Trustly
- Moov vs Volt
- Moov vs Basis Theory
- Moov vs TrueLayer
- Moov vs Highnote
- Moov vs Yapily
- Moov vs Backbase
- Moov vs Enfuce
- Moov vs Stoplight
